Beyond the Buzzword: I Faced an “Undue Hardship” Denial and Discovered It’s Not a Wall, It’s a Blueprint

My world tilted the day I got the diagnosis.

It was a chronic neurological disorder, one that brought with it debilitating migraines and an acute sensitivity to sound and light.

But amidst the fear, there was a flicker of hope.

The solution seemed so simple, so reasonable.

I needed noise-canceling headphones and the ability to work from a quieter, low-traffic spot in our open-plan office.

I approached my manager, hopeful for a small adjustment that would allow me to keep doing the job I loved.

The conversation was brief.

The answer was No. The reason was a single, monolithic phrase that felt like a brick wall hitting me at full speed: “This would create an undue hardship on our operations.”

I was stunned.

Confused.

The words hung in the air, vague and impenetrable.

I felt powerless, my future at the company suddenly precarious.¹

This experience, I would later learn, is distressingly common.

Many employees, when seeking an accommodation, are met with resistance from employers who may not fully grasp their obligations or who mistakenly believe any change constitutes an undue hardship.²

My journey wasn’t about launching a legal battle; it was a desperate quest for clarity.

I had to understand what this phrase, “undue hardship,” truly meant.

Was it just a legal shield employers could raise at will, or was there a logic I was missing?

The Epiphany — It’s Not a Legal Wall, It’s an Engineering Assessment

My breakthrough came from the most unexpected place.

Late one night, scrolling through documentaries, I landed on one about architectural engineering.

An expert was explaining how they determine if an old building can support a major renovation.

They don’t just look at the request and say “No.” They perform a detailed Structural Load-Bearing Assessment.

They meticulously analyze the building’s existing structure, its foundation, its available resources, and the specific nature of the proposed change.

They do this to see if the renovation would compromise the building’s fundamental integrity.

And that’s when it clicked.

“Undue hardship” isn’t a legal wall.

It’s a business’s version of that structural assessment.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) doesn’t just permit an employer to say no; it requires them to produce the equivalent of an engineering report to prove that the refusal is necessary.

The law demands a nuanced, case-by-case analysis based on multiple factors.⁴

This epiphany reframed the entire concept for me.

It wasn’t about fighting a wall; it was about understanding the blueprint.

To truly grasp “undue hardship,” we must deconstruct it just as an engineer would assess a building, looking at four core pillars:

1. Surveying the Structure: The employer’s specific anatomy (its size, resources, and operations).
2. Designing the Renovation: The nature of the accommodation itself (its cost, type, and the creative solutions available).
3. The Stress Test: Pinpointing what legally constitutes “significant difficulty or expense.”
4. The Collaborative Build: The interactive process as the joint project to find a workable solution.

Pillar I – Surveying the Structure: The Anatomy of the Employer

Before an engineer can approve a renovation, they must first understand the building they’re working with.

A skyscraper can bear a far heavier load than a small corner store.

Similarly, the ADA’s undue hardship analysis begins by surveying the specific characteristics of the employer.

The “load” a business can reasonably bear is entirely relative to its own structure.

Scale and Resources (The Skyscraper vs. The Corner Store)

The ADA explicitly states that an undue hardship assessment must consider an employer’s size and financial resources.²

What might be a significant expense for a small, independent business could be negligible for a large, multinational corporation.⁴

This analysis, however, goes deeper than the balance sheet of a single office or store.

The law requires that if the facility making the accommodation is part of a larger entity, the overall resources of that larger organization must be considered.⁴

This is a crucial distinction.

A manager at a local branch of a national chain might deny a request based on a tight local budget.

However, the law compels a wider view, looking at the parent corporation’s deep pockets.

This consideration of the total enterprise—including its overall budget and number of employees—is a powerful counter to a cost-based denial from a subsidiary or franchise.⁹

This led me to a critical realization: when an employee at a large company faces a cost-based denial, the first and most powerful question to ask is whether the assessment included the financial resources of the entire parent organization.

This simple query can reframe the entire financial calculus and often reveals that a claim of hardship is not as solid as it first appears.

Operational Blueprint (The Assembly Line vs. The Think Tank)

Beyond finances, the “nature and structure of its operation” is a key factor.⁴

This is the business’s operational blueprint.

An accommodation that might be simple in one environment could be genuinely disruptive in another.

For example, a request for a modified schedule from a software engineer with flexible project deadlines is fundamentally different from the same request made by an emergency room nurse, where strict staffing ratios are critical for patient safety and legal compliance.²

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) considers factors like the composition of the workforce and how interdependent roles are.⁸

A highly sequential manufacturing process, where one person’s absence or altered schedule could halt the entire line, presents a very different operational challenge than a think tank where employees work more independently.⁸

The Foundation – Identifying “Essential Functions”

At the core of any job’s structure are its “essential functions.” A reasonable accommodation is a change that enables a qualified employee to perform these fundamental duties.⁵

An employer is never required to eliminate an essential function as part of an accommodation, as this would be like removing a load-bearing wall from the building—the role itself would collapse.¹³

Determining which functions are “essential” versus “marginal” is a critical, fact-based inquiry; it is not merely based on a manager’s opinion.¹⁵

The EEOC looks at concrete evidence: the employer’s judgment, the amount of time spent performing the function, the consequences of not performing it, and the terms of any collective bargaining agreements.⁵

Perhaps the most important piece of evidence is the written job description, especially one prepared before the position was advertised.⁵

This makes the job description a double-edged sword.

For an employer, an outdated or vague job description can severely weaken a later claim that a particular task is essential.

If a duty isn’t listed or is described as minor, it becomes difficult to argue it is fundamental to the role.

For an employee, requesting a copy of the official job description is a crucial first step in the accommodation process.

This single document can become the central exhibit in any discussion, providing a clear, pre-existing definition of the job’s core requirements.

Factor Category	Key Questions for Assessment
Financial Resources	What are the overall financial resources of the entire company, not just this facility? Is the business a small, independent entity or part of a larger corporation? 4
Size & Scale	How many total employees does the company have, and how many are at this specific facility? 6
Operational Nature	What is the type of operation (e.g., manufacturing, service)? How is the workforce structured? Is work highly interdependent? 8
Essential Functions	Does the written job description identify this function as essential? How much time is spent on it? What are the consequences if it is not performed? 5

Pillar II – Designing the Renovation: The Nature of the Accommodation

Once the building’s structure is understood, the engineer can analyze the proposed renovation—the accommodation itself.

A common misconception is that accommodations are inherently expensive and disruptive.

However, data and a little creativity reveal that most “renovations” are far less burdensome than employers often fear.

The Myth of the Million-Dollar Fix: Cost vs. Reality

While “undue hardship” is often associated with high costs, this is frequently one of the weakest arguments an employer can make.

The legal standard is not just any expense, but “significant difficulty or expense”.⁴

Data from the Job Accommodation Network (JAN), a leading resource funded by the U.S. Department of Labor, systematically dismantles the cost myth.

According to years of JAN surveys, the reality of accommodation costs is staggering in its affordability:

• Nearly half of all accommodations cost absolutely nothing to implement.¹⁷
• For those that do have a cost, the median one-time expenditure is remarkably low, typically around $300 to $500.¹⁷
• Employers consistently report that the benefits—such as retaining a valued employee, increasing productivity, and boosting company morale—far outweigh these minimal costs.¹⁷

This data reveals that an employer’s immediate resort to a “cost” argument should be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism.

It is often a reflexive, uninformed response rather than a calculated analysis of a significant financial burden on the entire enterprise.¹⁵

When faced with this claim, an employee can effectively counter it by presenting this data and asking for a specific breakdown of how a minor expense constitutes a “significant” hardship for the overall business.

The Architect’s Toolkit: A Universe of Creative, Low-Cost Solutions

Accommodation is not a rigid demand but a flexible, creative process.²¹

The most effective solutions are often simple, low-tech, or even no-tech changes to the work environment or policies.²³

• For Physical and Mobility Impairments: Solutions can be as simple as raising a desk on wooden blocks to fit a wheelchair, providing a stool to alleviate fatigue, or reassigning an employee to service accessible client sites while another covers the inaccessible ones.²³
• For Sensory Impairments: Accommodations often leverage existing technology. This can include providing instructions via email instead of verbally, using built-in screen magnifiers on computers, or providing noise-canceling headphones.²³ My own request for headphones and a quiet desk falls squarely into this category of simple, low-cost solutions.
• For Cognitive and Mental Health Conditions: Some of the most effective accommodations cost nothing at all. These include allowing a flexible work schedule for therapy appointments, providing a quiet workspace to minimize distractions, using checklists to aid with organization and task completion, or permitting a service animal in the office.²⁶
• For All Disabilities: Changes to workplace policies are among the most common and impactful accommodations. Modifying arrival and departure times, allowing for more frequent breaks, or permitting telework are powerful tools that often have no direct financial cost.²⁴

Finding Outside Funding: Tax Incentives and Deductions

Even when an accommodation does incur a cost, the law requires employers to consider outside funding sources before they can claim undue hardship.⁵

The federal government offers several tax incentives to help businesses offset these expenses:

• Disabled Access Credit (IRS Form 8826): This allows eligible small businesses to receive a tax credit of up to $5,000 for expenditures made to improve accessibility.³²
• Architectural/Transportation Barrier Removal Deduction: This allows businesses of any size to take a tax deduction of up to $15,000 per year for costs associated with removing physical barriers.³⁴
• Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC): This provides employers with a tax credit for hiring individuals from certain targeted groups, including people with disabilities.³³

Finally, if a cost truly does represent an undue hardship even after considering these resources, the employer must give the employee the option to pay for the portion of the cost that creates the hardship.⁴

Employee’s Challenge	Common (but Mistaken) Fear	Realistic, Low/No-Cost Solutions	Typical Cost (per JAN)
Employee with carpal tunnel needs ergonomic support. 37	“We’ll have to buy a whole new expensive office setup.”	Provide a vertical mouse, ergonomic keyboard, or a wrist rest. 37	$0 – $300
Employee with ADHD is distracted by office noise. 38	“We can’t rebuild the office to make it quiet.”	Provide noise-canceling headphones; move the employee’s desk to a quieter corner; allow flexible WFH days. 24	$0 – $50
Employee with diabetes needs to manage blood sugar. 40	“This will constantly disrupt the workday.”	Allow flexible breaks for monitoring/snacks; provide an exception to “no food at desk” rules. 40	$0
Employee with low vision struggles with standard text. 8	“We need to buy expensive, specialized software.”	Use built-in accessibility features on computers (magnifiers, screen readers); provide documents in large-print or electronic format. 23	$0
Employee with anxiety needs support during stressful periods. 8	“We can’t change job pressures.”	Allow an employee to bring a service animal; provide clear, written instructions; offer a flexible schedule for therapy appointments. 19	$0

Pillar III – The Stress Test: Pinpointing “Significant Difficulty or Expense”

Now we apply the stress test.

Knowing the building’s structure (the employer) and the proposed renovation (the accommodation), we can analyze what it would actually take to compromise the building’s integrity.

The legal standard for “undue hardship” is high; it is far more than mere inconvenience.¹

The EEOC and courts recognize three primary ways an accommodation can create a “significant” burden: by causing undue financial hardship, creating major operational disruption, or fundamentally altering the nature of the business.⁸

Financial Fracture – When Cost Becomes “Significant”

As established, the financial bar for undue hardship is exceptionally high.

The cost must be so substantial that it would either “alter the essential nature of the enterprise” or “substantially affect its viability”.²⁰

An employer cannot simply declare an accommodation is “too expensive”; they must present objective, quantifiable evidence to support this claim.¹⁰

Vague assertions or speculation about potential financial losses will not suffice in a legal challenge.²⁰

Operational Disruption – When the Gears Grind to a Halt

This type of hardship occurs when an accommodation would seriously undermine the ability of other employees to perform their duties or the organization’s capacity to conduct its business.⁸

A landmark case in this area is EEOC v.

Ford Motor Co. Ford successfully argued that denying a resale buyer’s request to telecommute up to four days a week was not a violation of the ADA.

The court found that her specific job was highly interactive, requiring constant teamwork and face-to-face meetings that were essential to the role.¹¹

In this fact-specific context, regular and predictable on-site attendance was deemed an essential function.

Allowing her to telecommute so frequently would have effectively removed that function and caused a significant operational disruption.⁴³

This case did not create a blanket ban on telework as an accommodation; rather, it affirmed that the reasonableness of an accommodation depends on whether it allows the employee to perform the essential functions of their specific job without causing an operational breakdown.

Other clear examples include an ER nurse whose request for unscheduled, intermittent leave could jeopardize legally mandated staffing ratios and patient safety, or a small retail business that cannot accommodate a late start time if it means the store cannot open for customers on time.²

Fundamental Alteration – When the Business Is No Longer Itself

This is the most extreme form of undue hardship, where an accommodation is so transformative that it would change the very nature of the business or the services it provides.⁸

For instance, a movie theater could rightly claim that a request from an usher with low vision to never dim the lights would fundamentally alter its business, as a dark theater is essential to the movie-going experience.⁸

The definitive case on this principle is US Airways, Inc. v.

Barnett.

In this case, the Supreme Court addressed a direct conflict between an employee’s accommodation request and the company’s established seniority system.

The employee, Robert Barnett, wanted to be exempted from the seniority-based bidding process to keep a less physically demanding job he had transferred into after an injury.⁴⁴

The Court ruled that an accommodation that requires an employer to violate the rules of an established seniority system is

ordinarily not reasonable.⁴⁶

The reasoning was that seniority systems are a fundamental part of many workplace structures, creating legitimate, stable, and predictable expectations for all employees regarding job security and advancement.⁴⁸

Forcing a company to bypass these established rules would fundamentally alter that operational contract with its entire workforce.

However, the Court did not create an absolute rule.

It deliberately left a door open for employees by establishing the “special circumstances” exception.

The general rule is that a seniority system prevails, but an employee can overcome this by showing that, in their particular case, the system is not as rigid as it appears on paper.

For example, if an employer frequently makes exceptions to the seniority system for other reasons, then the employees’ expectations of its inviolability are reduced, making one more exception for a disability accommodation potentially reasonable.⁴⁸

This crucial exception shifts the burden of proof.

The employer can point to the seniority system conflict, but the employee then has the opportunity to demonstrate that, in practice, the system is flexible enough to bear the load of their requested accommodation.

Pillar IV – The Collaborative Build: The Interactive Process as a Joint Project

The final pillar is about the “how.” If undue hardship is the engineering assessment, the interactive process is the collaborative project meeting between the employee and the employer to design a workable solution.

A breakdown in this process is like a construction project without communication or a shared blueprint—it is almost certain to fail.

This process is a mandatory, good-faith dialogue, and an employer’s failure to engage in it is a significant legal risk.⁵¹

A Step-by-Step Guide to the Interactive Process

The interactive process is a flexible, cooperative dialogue, not a rigid, adversarial negotiation.

It generally unfolds in these steps:

1. The Request (The Project Kick-off): The process begins when an employee indicates they need a change at work for a reason related to a medical condition. The employee does not need to use “magic words” like “ADA” or “reasonable accommodation”.⁵⁵ A simple statement, such as “My medical treatments are making it hard for me to get to work on time,” is sufficient to trigger the employer’s obligation to begin the conversation.⁵⁵
2. Information Gathering (Reviewing the Site Plans): If the disability or the need for accommodation is not obvious, the employer may ask for reasonable medical documentation. This is not a license to access the employee’s entire medical history. The request must be limited to information necessary to confirm the existence of an ADA-covered disability and to understand the functional limitations that require accommodation.⁵⁸
3. Brainstorming (The Design Charrette): This is the heart of the process. The employer and employee work together to identify potential effective accommodations. The employee’s preference should be given primary consideration, though the employer has the ultimate discretion to choose between effective options, particularly if one is less expensive or easier to provide.⁶ This is the stage where creative, low-cost solutions from resources like JAN’s A-to-Z of Accommodations can be invaluable.⁶¹
4. Implementation (Breaking Ground): Once an effective accommodation is chosen, the employer must implement it promptly. Unnecessary delays in providing an accommodation can be considered a violation of the ADA.¹⁴
5. Follow-up (The Post-Occupancy Evaluation): The process is not over once the accommodation is in place. Both parties should monitor its effectiveness. If circumstances change or the accommodation is no longer working, the interactive process should be re-engaged to find a new solution.⁵¹

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them (Demolition Risks)

Both employers and employees can cause the process to break down.

Some common mistakes include:

• For Employers: Defining “undue hardship” too broadly by citing minor costs or coworker complaints ¹⁵; failing to document the entire interactive process, which is a key defense in any potential litigation ²⁹; and ending the dialogue with a simple “no” instead of exploring alternatives when an initial request is not feasible.⁴
• For Employees: Refusing to participate in good faith. The process is a two-way street. An employee who obstructs the dialogue by refusing to provide necessary medical information or consider any reasonable alternative to their preferred accommodation can forfeit their protections under the ADA.⁵²

Ultimately, a robust, well-documented interactive process serves as a proactive shield against litigation.

Courts heavily scrutinize the good-faith effort of both parties.⁵²

By demonstrating a thorough and collaborative effort to find a solution, an employer can build a strong defense even if a perfect accommodation cannot be Found. For employees, this means the goal should always be to keep the conversation moving forward and to document their own good-faith participation.

Step	Employee’s Role (The “Client”)	Employer’s Role (The “Architect”)
1. Request	Clearly state the need for a work-related change due to a medical condition. Can be verbal or written. 55	Recognize the request (no magic words needed). Acknowledge receipt promptly and explain the next steps. 58
2. Clarify	Engage in dialogue about job-related limitations. Provide reasonable, requested medical documentation to support the need. 64	Analyze essential job functions. Ask relevant questions to understand limitations. Request limited medical documentation if the need isn’t obvious. 51
3. Explore	Suggest potential accommodations. Be open to exploring alternatives offered by the employer. 21	Brainstorm solutions. Consult resources like JAN. Consider the employee’s preference but choose an effective accommodation. 6
4. Implement	Cooperate with the implementation of the agreed-upon accommodation.	Implement the chosen effective accommodation without unnecessary delay. 14
5. Follow-Up	Provide feedback on whether the accommodation is effective. Re-engage if needs change.	Monitor the accommodation’s effectiveness. Re-engage in the interactive process if the solution is not working. 51

Conclusion: From Blueprint to a Better Workplace

Armed with my new “Structural Load-Bearing Assessment” framework, I went back to my employer.

This time, I didn’t see an impenetrable wall; I came prepared with a blueprint.

I was able to calmly explain that the “load” of my request—a pair of headphones and a desk change—was minimal when measured against the company’s significant structural capacity.

We engaged in a genuine interactive process, a collaborative conversation grounded in facts, not fear.

We found a solution that worked for everyone.

The term “undue hardship” does not have to be a weapon that ends conversations or a wall that blocks progress.

When viewed as a diagnostic tool—a structured, objective assessment—it empowers both sides.

For employees, it provides a clear framework to analyze a request, anticipate objections, and advocate from a position of informed strength.

For employers, it offers a legally defensible process to evaluate requests fairly, fostering trust, retaining valuable talent, and avoiding the high costs and low morale that come with litigation.²

The ADA provides the blueprint for building an accessible and productive workplace.

By shifting from an adversarial mindset to a collaborative, problem-solving one, we can move beyond the fear and confusion surrounding “undue hardship.” We can build workplaces that are not only compliant, but are truly inclusive, innovative, and stronger for everyone.

It is up to all of us to build it together.

Works cited

1. ADA Awareness: What is Undue Hardship? – Filippatos PLLC, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.filippatoslaw.com/blog/ada-awareness-what-is-undue-hardship/
2. How HR Can Navigate Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship with Confidence, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://absencesoft.com/resources/how-hr-can-navigate-reasonable-accommodation-and-undue-hardship-with-confidence/
3. Disability Accommodations Rejected – what is my best course of action? : r/legaladvicecanada – Reddit, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvicecanada/comments/1gyavrv/disability_accommodations_rejected_what_is_my/
4. What is considered an “undue hardship” for a reasonable accommodation?, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://adata.org/faq/what-considered-undue-hardship-reasonable-accommodation
5. The ADA: Your Responsibilities as an Employer, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/publications/ada-your-responsibilities-employer
6. Small Employers and Reasonable Accommodation, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/small-employers-and-reasonable-accommodation
7. Undue Hardship – elaws – Disability Nondiscrimination Law Advisor, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/odep/glossary.aspx?Glossary_Word=Undue
8. Fact Sheet: Reasonable Accommodations and Undue Hardship | Great Plains ADA Center, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://gpadacenter.org/reasonable-accommodations-and-undue-hardship/
9. Reasonable Accommodation Procedures for Individuals with Disabilities – U.S. Marshals Service, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.usmarshals.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/reasonable-accommodation-procedures.pdf
10. How Courts Define “Undue Hardship” in CA Disability Cases – Romero Law, APC, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.romerolaw.com/blog/2024/12/how-courts-determine-what-constitutes-an-undue-hardship-in-california-disability-discrimination-cases/
11. En Banc Sixth Circuit Decision Holds That Telecommuting Was Not a Reasonable Accommodation Under the Americans with Disabilities Act for Ford Employee | Mintz, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2015-04-15-en-banc-sixth-circuit-decision-holds-telecommuting-was-not
12. The ADA: Your Employment Rights as an Individual With a Disability, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/publications/ada-your-employment-rights-individual-disability
13. Undue Hardship Examples and Legal Standards Under the ADA – UpCounsel, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.upcounsel.com/undue-hardship
14. Reasonable Accommodations for Employees With Disabilities – Bloomberg Law, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/labor-employment/reasonable-accommodations-for-employees-with-disabilities/
15. ADA Game Changer: Avoid 10 Common Mistakes in the Reasonable Accommodation Process – Duane Morris, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.duanemorris.com/articles/ten_mistakes_reasonable_accommodation_3721.html
16. 10 ADA Mistakes Employers Should Avoid – Helpside, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.helpside.com/10-common-ada-mistakes-avoid/
17. Study Illustrates Cost, Impact of Workplace Accommodations, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://nib.org/study-illustrates-cost-impact-of-workplace-accommodations/
18. Report Quantifies ‘Low Cost, High Impact’ of Accommodating Disabled Workers, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://facilitiesmanagementadvisor.com/design-and-construction/report-quantifies-low-cost-high-impact-of-accommodating-disabled-workers/
19. Workplace Accommodations: Low Cost, High Impact, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://hdi.uky.edu/setp/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/10/Workplace_Accommodations_Low_Cost_High_Impact.pdf
20. 9. Undue hardship | Ontario Human Rights Commission, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www3.ohrc.on.ca/en/policy-ableism-and-discrimination-based-disability/9-undue-hardship
21. Accommodations – Canadian Association for Supported Employment, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.supportedemployment.ca/hrtoolkit/accommodations/
22. Employers’ Top 10 Factors to Successful Reasonable Accommodations Outcomes, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.adainfo.org/ada-information/employers/top-10-factors-to-successful-ra/
23. Types of Reasonable Accommodation | odr – Office of Disability Rights, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://odr.dc.gov/page/types-reasonable-accommodation
24. 6 Simple (and Affordable) Ways to Make Your Workplace More Accommodating to Workers With Disabilities – Senior Executive, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://seniorexecutive.com/6-simple-and-affordable-ways-to-make-your-workplace-more-accommodating-to-workers-with-disabilities/
25. Does anyone else feel like using their ADA accommodations at work puts a target on their back? : r/disability – Reddit, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/disability/comments/1br5go0/does_anyone_else_feel_like_using_their_ada/
26. Acceptance and Accommodations: Bridges to Workplace Inclusion – Rooted in Rights, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://rootedinrights.org/acceptance-and-accommodations-bridges-to-workplace-inclusion/
27. Workplace ADA Accommodation Success Story : r/CPTSD – Reddit, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CPTSD/comments/14cp4l8/workplace_ada_accommodation_success_story/
28. Reasonable Accommodations in the Workplace – ADA National Network, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://adata.org/factsheet/reasonable-accommodations-workplace
29. What Is Undue Hardship? Key Factors for ADA Compliance – EPAY Systems -, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://blog.epaysystems.com/what-is-undue-hardship/
30. #ADA35: 3 Examples of Reasonable Accommodations and 3 Resources That Can Guide You to Them | Choose Work! – Ticket to Work – Social Security, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://choosework.ssa.gov/blog/2023-07-26-ada35-examples-of-reasonable-accommodations.html
31. The Employers’ ADA Handbook – Session 2 Reasonable Accommodations and Undue Hardship – YouTube, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzQSj5WtXEE
32. adata.org, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://adata.org/faq/what-financial-assistance-available-employers-help-them-make-reasonable-accommodations-and#:~:text=An%20eligible%20small%20business%20may,%24250%20but%20less%20than%20%2410%2C250.
33. Tax Incentives for Small Businesses that Support Accessibility – Illinois Attorney General, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/Page-Attachments/tax_incentives.pdf
34. ADA IRS Tax Credit Information – ADA.gov, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://archive.ada.gov/taxcred.htm
35. Tax benefits for businesses that accommodate people with disabilities – IRS, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/tax-benefits-for-businesses-that-accommodate-people-with-disabilities
36. Credits and Incentives – CA Department of Rehabilitation, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.dor.ca.gov/Home/CreditsandIncentives
37. requesting accommodations at work: share your experiences – Ask a Manager, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.askamanager.org/2019/10/requesting-accommodations-at-work-share-your-experiences.html
38. [AZ] Success Stories or Reasonable Accommodation to Work Remote : r/AskHR – Reddit, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHR/comments/1jgutnb/az_success_stories_or_reasonable_accommodation_to/
39. [AZ]What are some examples of reasonable accommodations for mental health disabilities : r/AskHR – Reddit, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHR/comments/1e0cemy/azwhat_are_some_examples_of_reasonable/
40. Reasonable Accommodation Examples and Ideas – Monster.com, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://hiring.monster.com/resources/workforce-management/diversity-in-the-workplace/reasonable-accommodation-examples/
41. Disability Accommodations Tips | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/small-business/disability-accommodations-tips
42. EEOC v. Ford Motor Co. – UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, accessed on August 2, 2025, http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/15a0066p-06.pdf
43. EEOC v. Ford Motor Company – Southeast ADA Center, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://adasoutheast.org/legal/court/eeoc-v-ford-motor-company/
44. US AIRWAYS, INC. V. BARNETT – Law.Cornell.Edu, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1250.ZO.html
45. US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett | Oyez, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.oyez.org/cases/2001/00-1250
46. US AIRWAYS, INC. v. BARNETT | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/00-1250
47. US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett – Wikipedia, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways,_Inc._v._Barnett
48. US AIRWAYS, INC. V. BARNETT – Law.Cornell.Edu, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1250.ZS.html
49. US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett | 535 U.S. 391 (2002) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/535/391/
50. US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett – Case Brief Summary for Law School Success – Studicata, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://studicata.com/case-briefs/case/us-airways-inc-v-barnett/
51. Reasonable Accommodation An Effective Interactive Process All Employee Resource – DOI Gov, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.doi.gov/sites/default/files/employee-resource-effective-interactive-process.pdf
52. ADA What Happens When Both Employer, Employee Fail Interactive Process?, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.calltherightattorney.com/blog/2023/05/ada-what-happens-when-both-employer-employee-fail-interactive-process/
53. Reasonable Accommodation | CRD – Civil Rights Department, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://calcivilrights.ca.gov/accommodation/
54. Get Interactive! Searching for ADA Accommodations with Employees | Insights & Events, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.bradley.com/insights/publications/2024/03/get-interactivesearching-for-ada-accommodations-with-employees
55. Eight Most Common Mistakes Made During the Reasonable Accommodation Process – Roe Law Group, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://roelawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Eight-Most-Common-Mistakes-Made-During-the-Reasonable-Accommodation-Process-00030126-1.docx
56. What is the process to request a reasonable accommodation in employment? | ADA National Network, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://adata.org/faq/what-process-request-reasonable-accommodation
57. Reasonable Accommodation Policy and Procedure – Department of Justice, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/usao/reasonable-accommodation-policy-and-procedure
58. What Are the Employer’s Obligations When Engaging in the ADA Interactive Process?, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.bassberryhrlawtalk.com/ada-interactive-process/
59. EEOC Informal Discussion Letter | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/foia/eeoc-informal-discussion-letter-284
60. 7 Key Steps to the ADA Interactive Process: ADA Checklist – Pulpstream, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://pulpstream.com/resources/blog/interactive-process-ada-checklist
61. A to Z of Disabilities and Accommodations – Transit Workforce Center, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.transitworkforce.org/resource_library/a-to-z-of-disabilities-and-accommodations/
62. Job accommodations |Workers With a Disability – CareerOneStop, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.careeronestop.org/ResourcesFor/WorkersWithDisabilities/job-accommodations.aspx
63. www.helpside.com, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.helpside.com/10-common-ada-mistakes-avoid/#:~:text=Using%20the%20%E2%80%9Cundue%20hardship%E2%80%9D%20provision,disability%20with%20the%20employee’s%20manager.
64. What Is the Interactive Process Under the ADA? – TriNet, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.trinet.com/insights/what-is-the-interactive-process-under-the-ada
65. A Guide to Requesting Reasonable Accommodations – ADA National Network, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://adata.org/employment-resource-hub/guide-requesting-reasonable-accommodations
66. Navigating the Reasonable Accommodation Process Learner’s Guide – Ohio.gov, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://dam.assets.ohio.gov/image/upload/ood.ohio.gov/Literature/OOD%20Navigating%20the%20RA%20Process%20Learner’s%20Guide%20041322.pdf
67. Conducting a Reasonable Accommodation Interview | ADANW – Northwest ADA Center, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://nwadacenter.org/factsheet/conducting-reasonable-accommodation-interview
68. The Business Benefits Of Hiring People With Disabilities – Forbes, accessed on August 2, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeseq/2025/07/08/the-business-benefits-of-hiring-people-with-disabilities/