Table of Contents
Introduction: The Flaw in the Foundation
For the first decade of my fifteen-year career in criminal justice reform, I believed in the logic of the system.
I saw myself as a pragmatist, working within a necessary framework of punishment and control.
I advised policymakers, designed programs, and spoke with incarcerated individuals, all from the premise that public safety demanded a firm hand.
I thought accountability was forged in the crucible of consequence, that “tough love” was the only language that could break through cycles of crime.
I believed we were building a wall to protect society, and that the individuals behind that wall were there because they had, through their own choices, forfeited their right to be anywhere else.
Then I met David.
He was nineteen, in for a drug offense, and possessed a sharp, cynical intelligence that he used as both a shield and a weapon.
I was assigned to his case as part of a pilot program aimed at reducing recidivism.
I followed the playbook.
I enforced the rules, demanded compliance, and spoke to him in the detached, authoritative language of the system.
We focused on his deficits, on the regulations he needed to follow upon release, on the consequences of failure.
We did everything “by the book.” When he was released, he was adrift in a world he no longer knew, with no support system and a stigma that closed every door.
Within six months, he was arrested for armed robbery.
His new sentence was twenty-five years to life.
The news of David’s re-incarceration wasn’t just a professional failure; it was a personal cataclysm.
It shattered the foundation of my work.
We had followed every procedure, checked every box, and the result was a predictable tragedy—a life destroyed, a community less safe, and a cycle of harm perpetuated.
The system hadn’t corrected him; it had simply contained him, processed him, and then released him, broken, into an environment where his failure was all but guaranteed.
That experience forced me to confront a question I had long avoided: Is the American prison system designed to warehouse human beings, or is it meant to cultivate change?
This question led me to a new way of seeing, a central analogy that has guided my work ever since: the distinction between a Warehouse and a Greenhouse.
The Warehouse is the system we have.
It is a model of containment, control, and punishment.
Its architecture is concrete and steel.
Its currency is compliance.
Its success is measured by security, by the absence of riots and escapes, and by its ability to isolate and manage a population deemed dangerous or disposable.
The Greenhouse, by contrast, is the system we could build.
It is a model of cultivation, rehabilitation, and restoration.
Its architecture is designed to let in light.
Its currency is growth.
Its success is measured by reduced recidivism, by the healing of individuals and communities, and by its ability to return people to society as productive, whole citizens.
This report is the story of my journey from an architect of the Warehouse to an advocate for the Greenhouse.
It is a forensic deconstruction of a system that has failed by every meaningful metric, followed by a detailed blueprint for a new paradigm—one rooted not in wishful thinking, but in proven, evidence-based practices from around the world.
We will first walk through the cold, concrete corridors of the Warehouse, examining its flawed history, its catastrophic expansion, and the immense human cost of its operations.
Then, we will step into the light and lay out the blueprint for the Greenhouse, a system designed not just to contain, but to transform.
Part I: Anatomy of a Warehouse – Deconstructing the American Carceral State
To understand why the American prison system fails so profoundly, we must dissect it.
We must examine its historical DNA, trace the policy decisions that fueled its monstrous growth, and look unflinchingly at the brutal realities of life inside its walls.
This is the anatomy of the Warehouse model—a system built on a foundation of control, expanded through fear, and sustained by a cycle of failure.
Section 1.1: A Foundation of Control, Not Correction
The American prison system was born from a deep and persistent contradiction.
On one hand, it was conceived with a noble ideal.
In 1790, Pennsylvanian Quakers established a new kind of institution, one they saw as a humane alternative to the squalid dungeons of Europe.
Their “Pennsylvania System” was designed as a space for quiet reflection, where individuals could read scripture, repent their sins, and achieve personal reform.1
It was, in theory, the first greenhouse.
However, this rehabilitative ideal was almost immediately challenged and ultimately supplanted by a competing model: the “Auburn System” in New York.
While also claiming a redemptive purpose, the Auburn model prioritized silent, hard labor and “redemptive suffering”.2
Incarcerated people were dressed in striped uniforms, forced to march in lockstep, and subjected to harsh beatings for speaking.2
This model, which valued economic productivity and absolute control over spiritual penitence, proved more influential.
The very first “modern” penitentiary, Eastern State, which was designed for strict solitude as a path to rehabilitation, incarcerated a Black man as its first resident, a grim foreshadowing of the system’s future.3
This foundational conflict—between the stated goal of rehabilitation and the operational priority of control—was decisively resolved in the aftermath of the Civil War.
As the nation grappled with the abolition of slavery, the prison system was repurposed as a tool of social and racial subjugation.
Southern states enacted “Black Codes,” a series of laws that criminalized normal behaviors for African Americans, such as vagrancy or unemployment.3
These codes, combined with the practice of “convict leasing,” allowed prisons to rent out incarcerated individuals—overwhelmingly Black men—to plantation owners and private companies as a new source of unpaid labor.3
The system’s evolution was not an accident; it was an adaptation.
It became a mechanism to maintain the systems of racial capitalism that had been supported by slavery.1
This history reveals a crucial truth about the American carceral state.
Its stated goal of rehabilitation has almost always been secondary to its unstated goals of social control and economic exploitation.
The Quaker ideal was a fleeting whisper, while the Auburn reality of control became the system’s load-bearing wall.
When the lofty ideals of reform conflicted with the socio-political demands for control and cheap labor, the latter invariably won.
Therefore, the modern system’s failures are not a recent deviation from a noble path but the logical endpoint of a trajectory set in the 19th century.
The Warehouse is not a bug; it is the system’s original, deeply embedded feature.
Section 1.2: The Great Carceral Expansion – The “Tough on Crime” Fallacy
For most of the 20th century, the U.S. incarceration rate was relatively stable.
That changed dramatically in the 1970s, marking the beginning of an unprecedented and catastrophic expansion.
This explosion was not a response to a historic crime wave but the result of a series of deliberate political and legislative decisions that transformed the nation’s approach to justice.
The first major trigger was President Richard Nixon’s declaration of a “War on Drugs” on June 18, 1971.1
In a message to Congress, Nixon declared drug abuse “public enemy number one,” a rhetorical move that fundamentally reframed a public health issue as a criminal threat.
This shift transformed the public image of a drug user from someone needing treatment to a “dangerous and anarchic threat to American civilization”.1
This war was dramatically escalated under President Ronald Reagan.
His administration championed the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, which established harsh mandatory minimum sentences, and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which expanded penalties for drug possession and created the infamous 100-to-1 sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine.1
These policies, which enjoyed bipartisan support, caused the prison population to skyrocket, particularly with non-violent drug offenders.1
The “tough on crime” era reached its zenith with the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, signed by President Bill Clinton.
This bill, the largest crime bill in U.S. history, allocated billions for new prisons, expanded the death penalty, and promoted punitive policies like “three strikes and you’re out” laws.4
It was during the Clinton administration that the nation witnessed the largest increase in federal and state prison populations in its history.4
This legislative fervor was fueled by a climate of fear, stoked by media narratives and concepts like the “superpredator” myth, which falsely portrayed a generation of young, predominantly Black youth as remorseless criminals.3
The sheer scale of this expansion is difficult to comprehend.
From 1970 to 2008, the number of people behind bars in the United States grew by an astonishing 700 percent.4
The pace of construction was frenetic; between 1970 and 1977, an average of 28 new jail facilities were built or queued for construction
every single month.3
The Warehouse model had gone into mass production.
| Year | Total Incarcerated Population (Prisons & Jails) | Key Policy Event | |
| 1970 | ~338,000 | Pre-Expansion Era | |
| 1980 | ~503,000 | “War on Drugs” Declared (1971) | |
| 1990 | ~1,148,000 | Sentencing Reform Act (1984), Anti-Drug Abuse Act (1986) | |
| 2000 | ~1,937,000 | Violent Crime Control Act (1994) | |
| 2010 | ~2,266,000 | Peak Incarceration Era | |
| 2024 | ~1,841,000 | Post-Peak Decline, but still historically high | |
| Sources: Data compiled from 1 |
This table makes the trajectory undeniable.
The explosion of the carceral population was not a gradual drift but a series of sharp, policy-driven accelerations.
The Warehouse was not built by accident; it was a deliberate, bipartisan, multi-decade construction project.
Section 1.3: The Revolving Door – The Myth of Deterrence
The primary justification for the Warehouse model is that it deters crime and keeps society safe.
If this were true, we would expect to see low rates of reoffending among those released.
The data, however, tells a story of profound and persistent failure.
The system is not a one-way street to public safety but a revolving door that cycles individuals back into the justice system time and again.
To understand this failure, it is crucial to distinguish between different measures of recidivism.
Recent data shows a notable drop in the three-year re-incarceration rate, which fell from around 50% for those released in 2005 to 39% for those released in 2012.8
This is often touted as a sign of progress.
However, a closer look reveals a more troubling reality.
The five-year
rearrest rate for the same 2012 cohort was a staggering 71%.8
This disparity reveals a critical truth about the system.
The declining re-incarceration rate may reflect policy shifts—such as states limiting re-incarceration for technical parole violations or the expansion of some diversion programs—rather than a fundamental change in the behavior of those being released.8
The system’s response has changed slightly, but the underlying problem has not.
A 71% rearrest rate demonstrates that the vast majority of people leaving prison are not equipped to succeed.
They are struggling with the same issues of poverty, trauma, addiction, and lack of opportunity that led them to prison in the first place.
An analysis of who returns and why further illuminates this failure.
The risk of recidivism is not primarily driven by the severity of one’s most recent crime.
People released after serving time for homicide have the lowest rates of rearrest (41.3%), while those convicted of property crimes have the highest (78.3%).8
This suggests that a person’s underlying needs and long-term history are far better predictors of risk than the single offense that landed them their latest sentence.
Furthermore, the most common reason for rearrest is not a new violent crime but a public order offense, a broad category that includes things like disorderly conduct or driving under the influence.8
This evidence leads to an unavoidable conclusion.
The Warehouse model is failing at its core mission.
The revolving door is not just a path back to a prison cell; it is a cycle of constant contact with the entire justice system—police encounters, court dates, probation violations—that creates chronic instability and prevents any chance of true reintegration.
The system is not a deterrent; it is a trap.
Section 1.4: Inside the Walls – The Human Cost of Warehousing
The failures of the Warehouse model are not abstract.
They are felt every day by the millions of people who live and work within its walls.
The internal logic of containment and control has created a system rife with exploitation, neglect, and torture.
Section 1.4.1: The Profit Motive – The Corruption of Privatization
Beginning in the 1980s, as the “War on Drugs” flooded public prisons, a new industry emerged: the for-profit, private prison.1
Proponents claimed privatization would bring free-market efficiency, reduce overcrowding, and save taxpayer money.11
The reality has been a perversion of the system’s purpose.
The argument for cost-effectiveness has proven to be largely illusory.
Private prisons often engage in “cherry-picking,” refusing to house the most expensive individuals—those with serious medical or mental health issues, or those requiring maximum security—and leaving them to the public system.10
Studies have found that when you account for this, private prisons are not necessarily cheaper and can even be more costly than their public counterparts.11
More insidiously, the profit motive creates a race to the bottom.
To maximize shareholder returns, private prison companies have a powerful incentive to cut costs.
This translates directly into lower pay, fewer benefits, and less training for correctional staff, which contributes to dangerously high turnover rates.11
This understaffing is a root cause of the higher rates of violence, inmate-on-inmate assaults, and contraband found in private facilities compared to public ones.10
The very business model is predicated on keeping beds full, creating an inherent conflict of interest with the societal goal of reducing incarceration.
As I once heard an assistant warden in a private facility captured on a recording say, “We don’t want them to feel as though they are individuals.
We want them, for lack of a better term, to feel like a herd of cattle”.13
This is the logic of the Warehouse taken to its capitalist extreme, where human beings are reduced to line items on a budget.
Section 1.4.2: The Health Crisis – A System of Neglect
The population inside America’s prisons and jails is one of the sickest in the country.
Incarcerated individuals are disproportionately likely to suffer from chronic illnesses like diabetes and hypertension, infectious diseases like HIV and Hepatitis C, and severe mental health and substance use disorders.14
The prevalence of Hepatitis C is estimated to be nine to ten times higher than in the general population, and over half of all state prisoners suffer from drug dependence.15
Despite this immense need, correctional healthcare is defined by systemic neglect.
Numerous studies and reports show that care is difficult to access and of low quality, with the system prioritizing cost control and liability avoidance over the well-being of its population.14
A staggering number of inmates with serious, chronic physical illnesses fail to receive any care while incarcerated.17
In most systems, incarcerated people are charged medical copays for doctor visits—a fee that can be equivalent to a month’s wages, creating a powerful deterrent to seeking help for all but the most dire emergencies.14
This systemic failure is not merely a humanitarian crisis; it is a direct and insurmountable barrier to rehabilitation.
It is fundamentally irrational to expect an individual to engage in the difficult cognitive and emotional work of education, therapy, or vocational training when they are suffering from untreated chronic pain, debilitating mental illness, or the constant anxiety of a communicable disease.
The failure of prison healthcare is not a separate issue from the failure of rehabilitation; it is a root cause.
A warehouse that allows its occupants to decay physically and mentally cannot, by any definition, be a place of positive change.
Section 1.4.3: The Hole – The Torture of Solitary Confinement
In the deepest, darkest corner of the Warehouse is the practice of solitary confinement.
It is the system’s ultimate tool of control, and it amounts to state-sanctioned torture.
The scientific evidence of its harm is overwhelming.
Prolonged isolation does not just cause psychological distress; it physically alters the human brain.
Neuroscientific research shows that social deprivation is processed by the brain in the same way as physical pain.18
It can cause the hippocampus—the region of the brain critical for learning, memory, and stress regulation—to shrink, while causing the amygdala, which mediates fear and anxiety, to become hyperactive.18
The psychological consequences are devastating and well-documented: severe anxiety, depression, paranoia, psychosis, and a dramatically increased risk of self-harm and suicide.18
A person in solitary is more than five times more likely to die by suicide than someone in the general prison population; fully half of all suicides in prisons and jails occur in solitary confinement.18
But statistics cannot capture the true horror of the experience.
The reality is better conveyed by those who have endured it.
Jeanne DiMola, who spent a year in solitary, described it as being “dead and the cell is your coffin.
Everything goes on without and around you.
But you stay the same…stagnant”.20
Anthony Graves, who spent 18 years in isolation on death row before being exonerated, speaks of the lasting trauma: “mood swings, emotional breakdowns, veins calcified with plaque, sleepless nights, loneliness, and difficulty being in large crowds”.20
Ian Manuel, placed in solitary at age 15, witnessed the depths of human desperation: “Some people would resort to cutting their stomachs open with a razor and sticking a plastic spork inside their intestines just so they could spend a week in the comfort of a hospital room…
Just so they could feel human again”.20
This is the logical end of the Warehouse model: a system so devoid of humanity that it drives people to self-mutilation in a desperate search for a moment of relief.
Section 1.5: The Face of the Warehouse – Stark Demographics
The Warehouse does not mete out its punishment equally.
Its population is a distorted reflection of society, one that starkly reveals and amplifies our deepest inequalities.
The most glaring disparity is racial.
Black people are incarcerated at more than five times the rate of white people.21
While Black Americans make up about 13% of the U.S. population, they constitute 38% of the federal prison population and 56% of the total incarcerated population when combined with Hispanics.21
The lifetime risk of imprisonment paints an even bleaker picture: based on current rates, one in three Black men born today can expect to be imprisoned in his lifetime, compared to one in six Latino men and one in seventeen white men.21
While recent trends have shown a welcome decline in the incarceration rates for Black men and women, the fundamental disparity remains deeply entrenched.23
| Demographics | % of U.S. Population | % of Incarcerated Population | Lifetime Likelihood of Imprisonment (Men) | |
| White | ~60% | ~31% (State/Federal) | 1 in 23 (4.4%) | |
| Black | ~13% | ~33% (State/Federal) | 1 in 4 (28.5%) | |
| Hispanic | ~19% | ~23% (State/Federal) | 1 in 6 (16.0%) | |
| Sources: Data compiled from 21 |
The system is also increasingly incarcerating women, who are now the fastest-growing correctional population, often for non-violent drug and property offenses.1
At the same time, the prison population is aging dramatically.
Due to decades of long sentences, there are now more people over the age of 55 behind bars than under the age of 25, creating a geriatric health crisis that the system is completely unprepared to handle.5
The face of the American Warehouse is disproportionately Black and brown, increasingly female, and rapidly graying.
It is the physical manifestation of our society’s failures to deal with poverty, racism, addiction, and mental illness.
Part II: The Greenhouse Blueprint – A New Paradigm for Corrections
The deconstruction of the Warehouse model is a grim but necessary task.
It reveals a system that is historically flawed, dangerously overgrown, and fundamentally broken.
But criticism without a constructive alternative is an empty exercise.
The second part of this report shifts from deconstruction to design.
It offers a blueprint for a new model of corrections—the Greenhouse—built not on control and punishment, but on human dignity and restoration.
Section 2.1: The Epiphany – From Warehousing to Cultivation
My own journey toward this new paradigm began in the ashes of my failure with David.
His story forced me to look beyond the American system I knew.
I began to research international models, and my search led me to the prison systems of Norway and the principles of restorative justice.
It was a profound epiphany.
I realized the problem wasn’t that our Warehouse was poorly managed; the problem was that we were building warehouses in the first place.
The goal shouldn’t be to build a better cage but to cultivate a different kind of environment altogether.
This is the essence of the Greenhouse analogy.
A greenhouse is a purpose-built environment designed to nurture growth.
It is not a random field left to the elements.
It requires specific, intentional inputs to produce a positive outcome.
It needs:
- Good Soil: A foundational belief in the inherent dignity of every individual.
- Sunlight and Water: Access to meaningful rehabilitation, education, and comprehensive healthcare.
- A Trellis: A structure of support, accountability, and community connection, embodied by restorative justice.
- A Skilled Gardener: A professional, well-trained staff whose role is to cultivate change, not merely enforce compliance.
These four pillars form the blueprint for a system that can actually achieve what the Warehouse only pretends to: create safer communities by transforming lives.
Section 2.2: Pillar 1: The Soil – Foundational Human Dignity
The entire Greenhouse model rests on a single, non-negotiable foundation: human dignity.
The American Warehouse often treats dignity as a privilege to be earned through compliance, a carrot to be dangled or a stick to be withheld.
The Greenhouse model understands that dignity is the essential soil in which all positive change must be planted.
Without it, rehabilitation cannot take root.
The most powerful real-world example of this principle is the Norwegian correctional system.
Their approach is guided by two core principles: normalization and rehabilitation.
Normalization means that life inside prison should resemble life on the outside as much as possible.28
The goal is to prepare individuals for a crime-free life by having them practice pro-social living while incarcerated, not by subjecting them to an alien and dehumanizing environment.
In practice, this looks radically different from an American prison.
Incarcerated individuals are referred to as “residents” or “patients”.29
They often have private rooms with their own bathrooms and a key to their living area.28
They wear their own clothes, cook their own meals, and are encouraged to build positive, professional relationships with staff.28
The focus is on de-escalation and communication, not confrontation and control.
The results of this dignity-first approach are staggering, as a direct comparison shows.
| Metric | United States (The Warehouse) | Norway (The Greenhouse) | |
| Core Philosophy | Punishment, Retribution, Containment | Rehabilitation, Normalization, Restoration | |
| Incarceration Rate | ~629 per 100,000 (among highest in world) | ~57 per 100,000 (among lowest in Europe) | |
| Recidivism Rate (2-year) | ~60-70% (rearrest) | ~20% (reconviction) | |
| Officer Training | Weeks (focused on security, control) | 2-3 Years University Degree (focused on social work, psychology, ethics, de-escalation) | |
| Daily Life | Controlled movement, shared cells, uniforms, limited autonomy, anti-fraternization policies | Private rooms, self-cooked meals, personal clothes, high autonomy, staff as role models | |
| Sources: Data compiled from 8 |
This dignity-based model is not a utopian fantasy; it is being successfully adapted in the United States.
The T.R.U.E.
(Truthfulness, Respectfulness, Understanding, Elevating) unit in Connecticut, inspired by a visit to a German prison, has created a groundbreaking program for young adults that focuses on mentorship and personal development.34
In Oregon, the Amend program at UCSF has worked with the state penitentiary to implement Norwegian techniques in its most challenging units.
The results have been transformative: a 74% drop in assaults among residents and an 86% decrease in staff use-of-force incidents in the behavioral health unit.29
These examples demonstrate a powerful causal link.
When a system starts from a baseline of respect, it creates the psychological safety necessary for individuals to let down their defenses and engage in the difficult work of change.
When a system strips people of their dignity, it breeds trauma, defensiveness, and resistance, making positive change all but impossible.
Dignity is not a reward; it is the foundational investment in a safer society.
Section 2.3: Pillar 2: The Sunlight & Water – Meaningful Rehabilitation and Healthcare
If dignity is the soil, then meaningful rehabilitation and comprehensive healthcare are the sunlight and water that make growth possible.
The Warehouse model often provides programming as an afterthought, if at all.
The Greenhouse model integrates it as a central, non-negotiable component of its design.
The transformative power of education and vocational training is well-documented.
Programs like Hudson Link for Higher Education, which provides college degree programs inside prisons, have seen recidivism rates of less than 2% among their graduates, compared to the national average.35
The Last Mile teaches incarcerated individuals to code, creating a proprietary platform that simulates a live coding experience without internet access, and then connects graduates with living-wage jobs upon release.35
The case of Ivan B., who was trapped in a cycle of re-incarceration until he entered a comprehensive program at South Bay Correctional & Rehabilitation Facility, shows the power of combining vocational training with mentorship and post-release support.36
These are not just programs; they are lifelines that provide skills, purpose, and a tangible path to a different future.
Crucially, this pillar cannot exist without a functioning healthcare system.
As established in Part I, a person cannot learn or grow if they are in constant physical or psychological pain.
Therefore, a core component of the Greenhouse model is the provision of proactive, accessible, and high-quality medical, mental health, and substance abuse treatment.
This is not just about treating acute issues; it’s about managing chronic conditions, providing intensive therapy for trauma and mental illness, and offering evidence-based treatment for addiction.
This principle of treatment over punishment also extends beyond the prison walls.
The most effective systems utilize a wide range of alternatives to incarceration (ATIs) for individuals whose offenses are driven by underlying health issues.
Drug courts, mental health courts, and other diversion programs provide court-supervised treatment in the community instead of a jail or prison sentence.37
These programs have been proven to reduce recidivism by addressing the root causes of criminal behavior, offering a more effective, humane, and cost-efficient path to public safety.37
Section 2.4: Pillar 3: The Trellis – Restorative Justice and Community Connection
The traditional punitive system operates on a simple, flawed premise: a crime is a violation of a law, and the state is the primary victim.
This framework sidelines the actual human beings who were harmed and reduces justice to a cold calculation of punishment.
The Greenhouse model requires a different support structure—a trellis—that can hold people accountable while repairing the web of relationships torn by crime.
This trellis is restorative justice.
Restorative justice is a philosophy and a set of practices that redefines crime as a violation of people and relationships.40
It asks a different set of questions: Who was hurt? What are their needs? And whose obligation is it to meet those needs?.40
This shifts the focus from what offenders
deserve to what they owe.
It is a process that seeks to repair harm by bringing together, on a voluntary basis, the person who caused harm, the person who was harmed, and affected community members.41
This model provides a far more meaningful form of accountability than simply “doing time.” It requires the person who committed the offense to directly confront the human impact of their actions, fostering empathy and addressing the root causes of their behavior.
For victims, it provides a voice, a chance to ask questions, to express their pain, and to have a say in how the harm can be repaired—a process that is often far more healing than watching the state exact punishment on their behalf.40
In practice, restorative justice can take many forms.
Victim impact classes, common in states like Missouri, provide a structured environment for offenders to learn about the ripple effects of their crimes.42
Community Reparation Boards, also known as Neighborhood Accountability Boards, bring offenders together with a group of citizen volunteers who represent the community, working together to create a plan to repair the harm done.42
Incarcerated individuals can participate in projects that give back to the community, such as growing food for food banks or making quilts for children with autism, creating a tangible sense of connection and purpose.42
This approach resolves the false dichotomy that the punitive system creates between victims and offenders.
The Warehouse model fosters a zero-sum game, where justice for the victim is framed as pain for the offender.
The restorative Greenhouse model understands that the two are intertwined.
By creating a process where the offender’s path to accountability is directly linked to the victim’s path to healing, it creates a system where justice is not a zero-sum calculation, but a mutually reinforcing process of repair that ultimately makes the entire community safer and more whole.
Section 2.5: Pillar 4: The Gardener – The Transformed Role of Correctional Staff
The final, indispensable pillar of the Greenhouse is the person who tends to it: the correctional officer.
In the Warehouse model, the role of a guard is primarily one of surveillance and control.43
They are enforcers of rules, trained to manage a population through authority and, when necessary, force.
The environment is often adversarial, stressful, and dangerous for staff and incarcerated people alike.
The Greenhouse requires a fundamental transformation of this role from a guard to a “gardener”—a skilled, professional agent of change.
This is perhaps the most striking difference in the Norwegian system, where correctional officers are not just guards; they are highly respected professionals who undergo two to three years of paid, university-level education in fields like psychology, social work, law, ethics, and de-escalation.28
They are trained to be mentors and role models, and their primary job is to build relationships and support the rehabilitation of the residents in their care.29
This professionalization benefits everyone.
For staff, it transforms a high-stress, often dangerous job into a fulfilling and respected career.
In the Amend program in Oregon, officers reported that as violence decreased, their own health and well-being improved due to diminished stress.29
For the incarcerated population, it creates a safe, predictable, and supportive environment where they are treated as human beings capable of change.
This dynamic relationship is the active ingredient that makes the Greenhouse work.
A system can have the best soil, sunlight, and structure, but without a skilled and dedicated gardener to tend to the plants, growth will be stunted.
A professional, well-trained, and humanistic correctional staff is the final, crucial element needed to cultivate change.
Conclusion: Cultivating Second Chances
Years after my failure with David, I had the opportunity to help implement a pilot program based on the Greenhouse principles in a state facility.
One of the first participants was a young woman named Maria.
Like David, she was in her early twenties, serving time for a drug-related offense.
But this time, the approach was different.
Instead of a sterile cell, she was in a unit that prioritized normalization.
She had a role in managing the living space and participated in group cooking.
Instead of being seen as just another inmate, she was assigned a primary officer—a “gardener” trained in motivational interviewing and trauma-informed care—who met with her weekly to build a relationship and develop a personal growth plan.
She was immediately connected with on-site medical staff who diagnosed and began treating a long-neglected chronic health condition and a co-occurring anxiety disorder.
She enrolled in a community college program offered within the facility and began taking business classes.
Most importantly, she participated in a restorative justice circle with a community member who had been impacted by a similar crime, a process that she later said was the first time she truly understood the harm her actions had caused and the first time she believed she could be someone different.
Today, Maria has been out for three years.
She has her associate’s degree and works as an assistant manager at a local business.
She is rebuilding her relationship with her family and volunteers as a mentor for other young women leaving the system.
Her story is not a miracle.
It is the predictable outcome of a system designed to succeed.
The contrast between David’s fate and Maria’s success is the central argument of this report.
The American Warehouse model—built on a flawed history of control, expanded by fear, and defined by operational failures—is a costly, ineffective, and inhumane tragedy.
It is a revolving door that consumes lives and resources while failing to make our communities safer.
The Greenhouse model—built on the pillars of foundational dignity, meaningful rehabilitation, restorative justice, and a professionalized staff—is not a soft-on-crime fantasy.
It is a smarter, evidence-based, and more effective path to public safety and human flourishing.
As the work of advocates at the Vera Institute of Justice, The Sentencing Project, and the ACLU shows, the movement for this change is growing.27
The choice before us is not between being tough or being lenient.
It is between continuing to invest in a failed system that warehouses human beings at an immense cost, or choosing to build a new system that cultivates second chances.
It is the choice between a concrete warehouse that casts a long, dark shadow over our society, and a greenhouse that lets in the light, fostering the growth that can heal individuals, restore families, and build safer, healthier communities for us all.
Works cited
- Incarceration in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States
- Were Early American Prisons Similar to Today’s? – JSTOR Daily, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://daily.jstor.org/were-early-american-prisons-similar-to-todays/
- TIMELINE OF INCARCERATION IN THE US | Maine State Museum, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://mainestatemuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Timeline-of-incarceration-in-the-US.pdf
- Equipping Individuals for Life Beyond Bars: Mass Incarceration in the U.S. – New America, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/reports/equipping-individuals-life-beyond-bars/mass-incarceration-in-the-us/
- People in Jail and Prison in 2024 Report, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://vera-institute.files.svdcdn.com/production/downloads/publications/People-in-Jail-and-Prison-in-2024-Report.pdf
- People in Jail and Prison in 2024 | Vera Institute, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.vera.org/publications/people-in-jail-and-prison-in-2024
- Federal Prisoner Statistics Collected Under the First Step Act, 2024, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/federal-prisoner-statistics-collected-under-first-step-act-2024
- New National Recidivism Report – Council on Criminal Justice, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://counciloncj.org/recidivism_report/
- 50 States, 1 Goal: Examining State-Level Recidivism Trends in the Second Chance Act Era, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://csgjusticecenter.org/publications/50-states-1-goal/
- Private Prisons vs. Public Prisons – Criminal Justice Programs, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.criminaljusticeprograms.com/articles/private-prisons-vs-public-prisons/
- Private Prisons | Pros, Cons, Debate, Arguments, Incarceration …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/procon/private-prisons-debate
- Private and Public Sector Prisons—A Comparison of Select Characteristics – United States Courts, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/68_1_5_0.pdf
- Prison Memoir – The Bookshelf | The Marshall Project, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.themarshallproject.org/books?share=tag-2594
- Public health | Prison Policy Initiative, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.prisonpolicy.org/health.html
- Health Care in Prisons and Jails Impacts Community Health – Issues in Science and Technology, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://issues.org/correctional-health-care-community-health-prisons-jails/
- Public Health Considerations for Correctional Health – CDC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/correctional-health/about/index.html
- The Health and Health Care of US Prisoners: Results of a Nationwide Survey – PMC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2661478/
- The Impacts of Solitary Confinement, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://vera-institute.files.svdcdn.com/production/downloads/publications/the-impacts-of-solitary-confinement.pdf
- How Solitary Confinement Contributes to the Mental Health Crisis | NAMI, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.nami.org/advocate/how-solitary-confinement-contributes-to-the-mental-health-crisis/
- First Hand Accounts – Seeing Solitary, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://seeingsolitary.limancenter.yale.edu/firsthand-accounts/
- Criminal Justice Fact Sheet | NAACP, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://naacp.org/resources/criminal-justice-fact-sheet
- BOP Statistics: Inmate Race, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_race.jsp
- Prisoners in 2020 – Statistical Tables, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/p20st.pdf
- A Generational Shift: Race and the Declining Lifetime Risk of Imprisonment – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10662370/
- Racial Disparities Persist in Many U.S. Jails | The Pew Charitable Trusts, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2023/05/racial-disparities-persist-in-many-us-jails
- Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison – Bureau of Justice Statistics, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/Llgsfp.pdf
- It’s time for prison reform in the U.S., featuring Elizabeth Swavola, Vera Institute of Justice, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.fordfoundation.org/news-and-stories/videos/the-future-is-hers/its-time-for-prison-reform-in-the-u-s-featuring-elizabeth-swavola-vera-institute-of-justice/
- Improving Prisons | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/improving-prisons
- How Norway is Helping to Restore Humanity Inside U.S. Prisons …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2023/08/425946/how-norway-helping-restore-humanity-inside-us-prisons
- Penal Practices: An American and Norwegian Comparison, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=ncpacapstone
- digitalcommons.unl.edu, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=ncpacapstone#:~:text=The%20American%20system%20focuses%20on,focuses%20on%20rehabilitating%20their%20prisoners.
- A Comparative Analysis of the United States’ Prison System – DigitalCommons@SHU, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2177&context=acadfest
- Rehabilitation Lessons from Norway’s Prison System – First Step Alliance, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.firststepalliance.org/post/norway-prison-system-lessons
- Reimagining Prison Web Report – Vera Institute, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.vera.org/reimagining-prison-web-report
- Prison to professional: 6 life after prison success stories – Stand Together, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://standtogether.org/stories/strong-safe-communities/6-stories-of-transformation-from-prisoner-to-professional
- How Prison Rehabilitation Programs Changed My Life: Ivan B’s Story, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://georeentryconnect.com/blog/prison-rehabilitation-program-success-story/
- Alternatives to Incarceration in a Nutshell | FAMM, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://famm.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/FS-Alternatives-in-a-Nutshell.pdf
- Alternatives to Incarceration – NYC – Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://criminaljustice.cityofnewyork.us/programs/alternatives-to-incarceration/
- Issues / Diversion and Alternatives to Incarceration – Fair and Just Prosecution, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://fairandjustprosecution.org/issues/diversion-and-alternatives-to-incarceration/
- About Restorative Justice | University of Wisconsin Law School, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://law.wisc.edu/fjr/rjp/justice.html
- Restorative CJS | Criminal Justice Alliance, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.criminaljusticealliance.org/systems-change/restorative-cjs/
- Restorative Justice | Missouri Department of Corrections, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://doc.mo.gov/programs/restorative-justice/restorative-justice-information
- What Do Correctional Officer Do? The Day-to-Day Job | Haven Gear, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://havengear.com/blog/what-does-day-to-day-look-like-for-a-correctional-officer/
- A Day in the Life of a Corrections Officer | NCC – Northwest Career College, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.northwestcareercollege.edu/blog/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-corrections-officer/
- The Sentencing Project, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.sentencingproject.org/
- Meet the Activists Fighting to Free People from LA Jails | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/meet-the-activists-fighting-to-free-people-from-la-jails
