The Resilient Ecosystem: A Journey into the Wild Heart of American Protest

Part I: Seeing the Forest – An Introduction to the Chaos

A common perception of American protest, especially when viewed through the dispassionate lens of a screen, is that of a chaotic, ephemeral noise.

It appears as a sudden, convulsive eruption of bodies and voices—a spectacle of fleeting anger that crests and then recedes, seemingly absorbed back into the vast, indifferent machinery of the state.

From the unemployed marches of the Great Depression to the nationwide demonstrations against police brutality in 2020, the visual grammar is often one of disruption and disorder.

This perspective, however, mistakes the weather for the climate.

It sees the individual storm but misses the vast, intricate ecosystem that produces it.

To truly understand American protest is to move beyond the simplistic view of it as mere noise and to begin seeing it as a complex, living system with its own rules, patterns, and life cycles.

The sheer scale of modern protest refutes any notion that it is a fringe activity.

The 21st century has witnessed a dramatic escalation in mass mobilization, a phenomenon accelerated by the advent of smartphones and social media, which allow for instantaneous, widespread communication and planning.¹

This is not simply a quantitative increase; it represents a fundamental shift in the grammar of American civic life.

Widespread mass protest has become a distinct characteristic of political engagement, with three of the five largest demonstrations in United States history occurring since 2017.

The 2020 George Floyd protests, for instance, mobilized an estimated 15 to 26 million people nationwide, making it the largest protest movement in the country’s history.¹

This surge builds upon a long tradition of dissent, from the Boston Tea Party to the Bonus Marchers of the 1930s, but its contemporary scale suggests a new normalization.³

A significant portion of the populace now appears to view street-level mobilization not as an act of last resort, but as a standard and essential tool in their civic toolkit.

This new reality complicates the political landscape, creating a more contentious and audible public square where the discontent of what has been called the “exhausted majority” is no longer silent.⁵

To navigate this new terrain, a new lens is required.

An ecological analogy provides a powerful framework for analysis.

A social movement is not a singular event but an ecosystem—a dynamic, interconnected web of diverse actors, competing strategies, and environmental pressures.

It has its towering canopy species, its complex life in the undergrowth, its symbiotic and predatory relationships, and its own cycles of fire and regrowth.

Understanding this ecosystem requires a journey from the canopy to the roots, to discover the foundational principles that give this chaotic, vibrant, and often contradictory force its enduring power and purpose.

The central question is not whether protest is noisy, but what that noise signifies about the health of the larger political body.

Part II: The Canopy Giants – The Function of Mass Mobilization

The first encounter with a mass mobilization event—a “canopy giant” like the 2017 Women’s March or a major climate strike—is an experience of overwhelming scale.

The sheer number of people, a river of humanity flowing through the canyons of a city, creates a powerful, visceral sense of collective will.

The initial analysis often focuses on this spectacle, on the immediate emotional impact of shared purpose.

Yet, the critical question remains: What does a crowd of this magnitude actually do? The answer is rarely found in immediate policy victories.

Instead, the primary ecological function of these massive protests is to act as a “keystone species,” fundamentally altering the political environment to create the conditions necessary for other, more targeted forms of activism to succeed.

The historical record is replete with examples of this dynamic.

The 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, which drew over 250,000 people to the Lincoln Memorial, was described by its organizers as a “living petition”.³

While it did not instantly pass the legislation its participants demanded, it demonstrated an “urgent need for substantive change” and created an undeniable moral and political pressure that was instrumental in the passage of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.⁶

The march, culminating in Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, did not write the law, but it fundamentally changed the national conversation, making the status quo untenable and legislative action inevitable.⁶

Similarly, the massive anti-Vietnam War protests of the late 1960s and early 1970s functioned as a powerful force of atmospheric change.

Events like the 1969 Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam, which drew 500,000 people to Washington d+.C., and the 1967 March on the Pentagon steadily eroded public support for the conflict.¹

This sustained public pressure was a significant factor in President Lyndon B.

Johnson’s decision not to seek reelection and ultimately contributed to the end of military conscription in 1973.⁹

The protests did not defeat armies on the battlefield, but they won a crucial battle for public opinion on the home front.

Even movements widely perceived as tactical failures can have profound, long-term success in this agenda-setting role.

The Occupy Wall Street movement of 2011, for example, failed to achieve any of its specific, often vaguely defined, objectives and was eventually cleared from its encampments.¹¹

Yet, its impact on the national discourse was undeniable.

The movement’s central slogan, “We are the 99%,” injected the issue of income inequality directly into the mainstream political debate.

News media mentions of the term “income inequality” rose dramatically during the protests and remained at a higher baseline long after the tents came down.¹³

Occupy changed the political weather, creating a new discursive environment where the campaigns for a $15 minimum wage and the populist economic platforms of later political candidates could take root and flourish.¹²

These canopy giants, therefore, function like the upper layer of a rainforest; they do not represent the entire ecosystem, but by controlling the light that reaches the forest floor, they determine what can grow beneath them.

Their power lies not in direct action, but in creating a new climate of possibility.

Part III: Life in the Undergrowth – A Taxonomy of Tactics

Moving beyond the spectacle of the mass march reveals a far more complex and diverse world of activism—the teeming life in the ecosystem’s undergrowth.

Here, a bewildering biodiversity of tactics is on display, each adapted to a specific purpose, target, and environment.

A protest movement’s resilience and effectiveness are not determined by a single strategy but by the richness of its tactical portfolio.

Just as a forest thrives on the interplay of countless species, a successful movement leverages a wide array of methods, from quiet persuasion to disruptive confrontation.

This tactical biodiversity can be categorized, much like a field biologist classifies species, by observing the function each tactic performs within the broader movement ecosystem.

The Civil Rights Movement provides a master class in this principle, demonstrating that the effectiveness of a tactic is highly context-dependent.

Nonviolent direct action, such as the student-led sit-ins that began in Greensboro, North Carolina, in 1960, was a powerful tool for desegregating public accommodations.

By physically disrupting the normal operations of segregated businesses, activists made the injustice of Jim Crow impossible to ignore and forced a direct response.¹⁴

However, this same tactic of direct action was not particularly effective for addressing the denial of voting rights, a problem rooted in bureaucratic obstruction rather than public commerce.

To tackle this, activists from the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and their local allies employed the much less visible, but ultimately crucial, approach of canvassing—going door-to-door, building relationships, and conducting painstaking voter education and registration drives.¹⁵

This illustrates a core ecological principle: there is no single “best” tactic, only the right tactic for a specific niche.

A systematic classification reveals the functional roles of these varied approaches, synthesizing a vast history of American dissent into an analytical framework.

A Typology of American Protest: An Ecological Perspective
Tactic (Species)	Ecological Role	Primary Resources Consumed	Typical Habitat (Environment)	Historical Examples
Mass March	Canopy Species (Agenda-Setting, Narrative Disruption)	Media Attention, Mass Participation	National Mall, City Centers	March on Washington 1963 6, Women’s March 2017 1
Sit-in/Occupation	Parasitic/Epiphytic (Disrupts Host Institution)	High Individual Risk, Time, Nonviolent Discipline	Lunch Counters, University Buildings, Govt. Offices	Greensboro Sit-ins 14, Anti-War Campus Takeovers 9
Boycott	Apex Predator (Applies Economic Pressure)	Community Cohesion, Sustained Commitment	Corporate/Municipal Services	Montgomery Bus Boycott 6, Hands Across America 1
Legal Challenge	Root System (Changes Foundational Rules)	Legal Expertise, Financial Backing, Patience	Courtrooms, Legislative Bodies	Brown v. Board of Education 14,	Loving v. Virginia 7
Community Canvassing	Mycelial Network (Slow, Deep Power-Building)	Time, Trust, Interpersonal Skill	Local Neighborhoods, Door-to-Door	SNCC Voter Registration 15
Symbolic Protest	Pollinator/Signaling Species (Spreads Ideas, Signals Moral Crisis)	Creativity, Moral Courage, Media Amplification	Public Squares, Digital Space	Draft Card Burning 10, ACT UP Die-ins 9, #BLM 16

Each of these “species” of protest plays a vital role.

The Legal Challenge, like the NAACP’s decades-long campaign against segregation that culminated in Brown v.

Board of Education, acts as the deep root system, slowly and methodically changing the foundational legal soil in which society is planted.⁶

The

Boycott, exemplified by the yearlong Montgomery Bus Boycott, functions as an apex predator, applying direct and sustained economic pressure that can cripple a target and force capitulation.⁶

Symbolic Protests, such as the burning of draft cards during the Vietnam War or the powerful “die-ins” staged by ACT UP to protest government inaction on AIDS, act as pollinators, spreading potent ideas and signaling a moral crisis that demands attention.⁹

The health of the entire protest ecosystem, therefore, depends on this diversity.

A movement that relies on only one tactic is brittle and easily countered.

A movement that can march in the capital, file lawsuits in the courts, organize boycotts in the marketplace, and build power in local neighborhoods is a resilient and formidable force for change.

Part IV: The Food Web – Symbiosis, Competition, and Predation

The idealized image of a social movement as a unified, monolithic force marching in lockstep toward a common goal is a convenient fiction.

The reality is far more complex and, from an ecological perspective, far more interesting.

The internal and external dynamics of protest movements resemble a complex food web, characterized by symbiotic relationships, fierce competition for resources, and the constant threat of predation.

These conflicts, far from being a sign of weakness, are often the very engine of a movement’s evolution and adaptation.

Symbiosis, or mutually beneficial relationships, is evident in the way movements learn from one another.

The anti-Vietnam War movement, for instance, did not emerge in a vacuum.

Its organizers explicitly borrowed the tactics of civil disobedience and the strategies of grassroots mobilization that had been honed and perfected by the Civil Rights Movement a decade earlier.⁹

Teach-ins on college campuses were modeled directly on seminars that had raised consciousness for civil rights, creating a cross-pollination of strategies that strengthened both ecosystems.

More visible, however, is Competition.

Social movements are rarely harmonious.

They are arenas of intense debate over ideology, strategy, and leadership.

During the Civil Rights era, profound tensions existed between the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).

The SCLC, led by Dr. King, favored a more centralized, charismatic leadership model focused on large-scale, media-oriented demonstrations, while SNCC championed a fiercely independent, decentralized, grassroots approach focused on deep community organizing.¹⁸

These were not merely personality clashes but fundamental disagreements about the nature of power and the most effective path to liberation.

Similarly, the LGBTQ+ rights movement has been marked by internal rifts, from the exclusion of transgender people in the goals of some early gay rights organizations to the “Lavender Menace” conflict, where lesbian activists confronted their exclusion from the mainstream feminist movement of the 1970s.²⁰

Today, this dynamic is visible within the Black Lives Matter movement in the ongoing debate between reformists, who advocate for policy changes like the “8 Can’t Wait” proposals, and abolitionists, who argue that the entire system of policing is irredeemable and must be defunded and dismantled.²³

The entire ecosystem also faces the constant threat of Predation from external forces.

The state possesses a formidable arsenal for suppressing dissent.

This can range from police issuing dispersal orders under the pretext of public safety and interfering with the right to photograph officers, to the use of aggressive and disproportionate force against protesters.⁵

The most extreme form of this predation was the FBI’s covert COINTELPRO program, which in the 1960s and 70s sought to “disrupt, discredit, and neutralize” groups like the Black Panther Party.

The program’s tactics included illegal surveillance, infiltration by informants, and, most insidiously, the deliberate fomenting of internal conflicts to weaken the organization from within.²⁷

This external pressure is compounded by the presence of counter-protesters, who, exercising their own First Amendment rights, create a competitive pressure that can lead to conflict and drain a movement’s resources.²⁶

These interlocking dynamics of symbiosis, competition, and predation have driven a crucial evolutionary adaptation in the structure of modern protest movements.

The shift from the hierarchical, leader-centric models of the mid-20th century to the decentralized, “leader-full” networks of today is a direct response to the historical effectiveness of state repression.

A movement with a single, charismatic leader like Dr. King is powerful, but it is also vulnerable; the assassination of that leader can be a devastating blow.

The leadership of the Black Panther Party was systematically targeted, with key figures being killed, imprisoned, or forced into exile.²⁸

The state learned that to kill a hierarchical movement, one need only cut off its head.

In response, the ecosystem adapted.

Movements like Black Lives Matter emerged with a deliberately decentralized, grassroots structure.³⁰

This model, with autonomous local chapters and an emphasis on local organizing over national leadership, is far more resilient to decapitation.

There is no single leader to arrest, no central office to raid.

While this structure creates its own challenges—such as a lack of message discipline and intense internal debates over tactics like “defund the police”—it makes the movement as a whole incredibly difficult to destroy.

The apparent messiness and internal conflict of modern movements are not a bug; they are a feature—an adaptive trait for survival in a hostile environment.

The ecosystem has learned to endure by becoming a swarm.

Part V: Fire and Regrowth – The Cycles of Burnout and Renewal

The work of activism is grueling.

It is a relentless confrontation with entrenched power, slow progress, and the immense emotional weight of injustice.

For the individual activist, this can lead to a state of profound exhaustion known as burnout.

This experience—a predictable outcome of high-stakes, long-term struggle—is not an end point but a natural phase in the movement ecosystem’s life cycle, akin to a forest fire that, while destructive, clears the undergrowth and enriches the soil for new life to emerge.

Activist burnout is a well-documented phenomenon, characterized by “energy depletion or exhaustion,” often accompanied by a “growing sense of disillusionment” and a feeling of profound ineffectiveness.³¹

Personal narratives from activists across different movements tell a consistent story: an initial period of exhilarating engagement and purpose gives way to disillusionment as legislative defeats mount and the magnitude of the problem feels overwhelming.³²

The psychological toll can be severe, leading to conditions analogous to post-traumatic stress, depression, and persistent feelings of guilt for not doing more.³⁴

This is the hidden cost of the struggle, the slow consumption of the human beings who fuel the movement.

Yet, just as an ecosystem adapts to the recurring threat of fire, successful movements develop strategies for managing burnout and fostering renewal.

The key is to understand that resilience is not an individual trait but a collective property.

It does not depend on the heroic, inexhaustible endurance of a few, but on the health of the movement’s “cultural soil”—the shared practices of community care, mutual support, and collective memory that allow the ecosystem to persist.

The Movement for a New Society (MNS), a Quaker-inspired activist network that emerged from the anti-war struggles of the 1970s, provides a powerful historical model.

Confronted with widespread burnout among activists weary from years of conflict, MNS proactively built a structure designed for sustainability.

They established cooperative living houses to dramatically lower expenses, allowing members to work only part-time for income and devote more energy to activism.

They created a culture of shared childcare, cooking, and household labor, and developed sophisticated training programs in nonviolence and community organizing.³⁶

By embedding the work of activism within a structure of deep, practical, communal support, they treated the well-being of their members not as an afterthought, but as a primary strategic resource.

This collective approach is also essential for cultivating hope, the crucial nutrient for long-term struggle.

The hope required for activism is not a facile optimism that everything will be fine.

As writer and activist Rebecca Solnit argues, it is an “embrace of the unknown,” a recognition that because the future is uncertain, there is room to act.³⁷

This form of hope is a discipline, grounded in the memory of past victories and an understanding that change is often indirect, unpredictable, and slow.

It is, as another analysis puts it, a combination of “goal-directed energy and the belief in pathways to achieve those goals”.³⁸

This kind of hope cannot be sustained in isolation.

It is cultivated collectively, through the sharing of stories, the celebration of small victories, and the creation of communities that can grieve losses together and remind each other that no single person carries the burden alone.³¹

The journey through burnout, then, leads to a profound realization.

The strength of a movement is not measured by the tirelessness of its individual participants, but by its capacity to care for them.

A healthy ecosystem has mechanisms for recovery.

It allows for fallow periods.

It understands that the decay of one part—an individual activist stepping back to recover—provides the nutrients that allow the rest of the system to continue and for new growth to eventually take its place.

Stepping back is not failure; it is a necessary, regenerative part of the cycle.

Part VI: The Unseen Root System – The Foundations of Dissent

After exploring the towering canopy of mass mobilization, the tactical biodiversity of the undergrowth, the complex food web of internal and external conflict, and the regenerative cycles of burnout and renewal, the final stage of the journey is to look beneath the surface.

What nourishes this entire, sprawling ecosystem? What is the foundational bedrock and the deep, unseen root system from which American protest draws its life? The answer reveals that protest is not an alien force attacking the American system, but rather an integral, and indeed essential, component of it—a deeply rooted mechanism for the nation’s survival and evolution.

The legal bedrock, the very soil in which protest grows, is the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

This foundational text explicitly protects “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”.⁴⁰

This is not a loophole or an oversight; it is a core design feature of the American political system.

It builds a crucial feedback loop directly into the nation’s operating system, legally sanctioning the act of collective dissent.

The courts have affirmed that this right is strongest in “traditional public forums” like streets, sidewalks, and parks, which is why these spaces have historically become the primary habitats for protest activity.²⁵

While this right is not absolute—the government can impose reasonable “time, place, and manner” restrictions to ensure public safety—the core principle of viewpoint neutrality means it cannot block a protest simply because it dislikes its message.⁴¹

This constitutional protection provides the essential space for the protest ecosystem to exist.

If the First Amendment provides the right to protest, systemic failures provide the reason.

Here, sociological systems theory, particularly the work of Niklas Luhmann, offers a powerful explanatory framework.

This theory posits that modern society is composed of various functional subsystems—politics, law, the economy, education, and so on.

Social movements, in this view, are not aberrations but necessary responses that emerge from the “lack of coordination between functional subsystems”.⁴³

When the formal systems of power fail to address a pressing grievance—when the political system is unresponsive, the legal system delivers injustice, or the economic system produces intolerable inequality—the protest system activates to signal a crisis and demand a correction.²⁵

The Civil Rights Movement did not arise in a vacuum; it was a direct response to the failure of the American legal and political systems to dismantle the institution of segregation nearly a century after the Civil War.⁷

The Black Lives Matter movement emerged from the persistent failure of the criminal justice system to provide accountability for police violence against Black people.²

Protest, therefore, is what happens when other systems fail.

This leads to the final, transformative understanding of American protest.

It is not a disease attacking the body politic, but the body’s own immune system responding to a pathology.

Its form, intensity, and location are diagnostic indicators of where other societal systems are breaking down.

Widespread, sustained protests against police brutality are a symptom of a crisis in the justice system.

Massive climate strikes organized by young people are a symptom of a perceived failure by the political and economic systems to address an existential threat.

The chaotic, disruptive, and often painful reality of protest is not a sign that the American democratic experiment is failing.

It is a sign that it is, against all odds, still alive—a testament to a system that, by design, contains the seeds of its own correction.

The wild, resilient, and ever-evolving ecosystem of protest is the nation’s vital, turbulent, and unending argument with itself.

Works cited

1. List of protests and demonstrations in the United States by size – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_protests_and_demonstrations_in_the_United_States_by_size
2. Black Lives Matter | Movement, Founders, Protest, George Floyd, Timeline, & Goals | Britannica, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Black-Lives-Matter
3. 20 of the Most Famous Protests In U.S. History – Freedom Forum, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.freedomforum.org/famous-protests/
4. Speaking and Protesting in America | American Archive of Public Broadcasting, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://americanarchive.org/exhibits/first-amendment
5. Who Protests, What Do They Protest, and Why? – IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://docs.iza.org/dp15697.pdf
6. The Civil Rights Movement | The Post War United States, 1945-1968 …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/post-war-united-states-1945-1968/civil-rights-movement/
7. Civil rights movement – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights_movement
8. The Modern Civil Rights Movement, 1954-1964 – National Park Service, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/civilrights/modern-civil-rights-movement.htm
9. The US Anti-Vietnam War Movement (1964-1973) | ICNC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/us-anti-vietnam-war-movement-1964-1973/
10. Opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_United_States_involvement_in_the_Vietnam_War
11. The power of protest in the US – Brookings Institution, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-power-of-protest-in-the-us/
12. Occupy Wall Street | 2011, Definition, Movement, & Purpose | Britannica, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Occupy-Wall-Street
13. Occupy After Occupy – Jacobin, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://jacobin.com/2014/06/occupy-after-occupy
14. The Civil Rights Movement: 10 Key Concepts | Learning for Justice, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.learningforjustice.org/the-civil-rights-movement-10-key-concepts
15. Civil Rights Movement Tactics, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.civilrightsteaching.org/resource/civil-rights-movement-tactics
16. About Black Lives Matter, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/
17. Vietnam War: special section – Antiwar and Radical History Project – University of Washington, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://depts.washington.edu/antiwar/vietnam_intro.shtml
18. What is Social Movement Ecology? | Open Philanthropy, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.openphilanthropy.org/wp-content/uploads/Ayni_social_movement_ecology.pdf
19. Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), accessed on August 9, 2025, https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/student-nonviolent-coordinating-committee-sncc
20. LGBTQ movements – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_movements
21. Lesbian Feminism, 1960s and 1970s · Lesbians in the Twentieth Century, 1900-1999, by Esther Newton and Her Students – OutHistory, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/lesbians-20th-century/lesbian-feminism
22. The Women’s Movement and Those it Left Behind – History 118, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://blogs.dickinson.edu/hist-118pinsker/2022/04/21/5860/
23. Supporting Black Lives Matter and Police – Network for Social Justice, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://nfsj.org/reflections-on-black-lives-matter-part-4-of-a-series/
24. Black Lives Matter Activists Want to End Police Violence. But They Disagree on How to Do It., accessed on August 9, 2025, https://time.com/5848318/black-lives-matter-activists-tactics/
25. Protesters’ Rights | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/protesters-rights
26. Protesters’ Rights | ACLU of Texas | We defend the civil rights and civil liberties of all people in Texas, by working through the legislature, the courts, and in the streets., accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.aclutx.org/en/know-your-rights/freedom-of-speech-right-to-protest
27. Black Against Empire: The History and Politics of the Black Panthers – Race, Politics, Justice, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/soc/racepoliticsjustice/2017/10/19/black-against-empire-the-history-and-politics-of-the-black-panthers/
28. The Black Panther Party and urban activism | African American History – Fiveable, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/african-american-history-since-1865/unit-7/black-panther-party-urban-activism/study-guide/RIMsKkZLNEgbWccD
29. Black Panther Party – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Panther_Party
30. Black Lives Matter – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter
31. Burned Out on a Burning Planet | Common Home | Georgetown University, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://commonhome.georgetown.edu/topics/climateenergy/burned-out-on-a-burning-planet/
32. Don’t Let Youth Climate Activists Like Me Burn Out – YES! Magazine, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.yesmagazine.org/opinion/2021/10/18/youth-climate-activists-burn-out
33. Combating Activist Burnout: Our Stories of Radicalization – Solidarity, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://solidarity-us.org/p1450/
34. Activist burnout in No Borders: The case of a highly diverse movement – PMC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12130585/
35. How do we keep going? Activist burnout and personal sustainability in social movements1 – – MURAL – Maynooth University Research Archive Library, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/2815/1/LC_How_do_we_keep_going.pdf
36. When activist burnout was a problem 50 years ago, this group found a solution, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://wagingnonviolence.org/2020/05/activist-burnout-50-years-ago-movement-for-a-new-society/
37. ‘Hope is a​n embrace of the unknown​’: Rebecca Solnit on living in dark times | Society books | The Guardian, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jul/15/rebecca-solnit-hope-in-the-dark-new-essay-embrace-unknown
38. “Hope and Political Change the Role of Positive Emotions in Mobilizing Social Movements”, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://ijhssm.org/issue_dcp/Hope%20and%20Political%20Change%20the%20Role%20of%20Positive%20Emotions%20in%20Mobilizing%20Social%20Movements.pdf
39. Persistent Resistance: Commitment and Community in the Plowshares Movement | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249985519_Persistent_Resistance_Commitment_and_Community_in_the_Plowshares_Movement
40. www.aclutx.org, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.aclutx.org/en/know-your-rights/freedom-of-speech-right-to-protest#:~:text=LAWS,the%20people%20peaceably%20to%20assemble.
41. Five ways the First Amendment protects your speech – and three ways it does not, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.acludc.org/news/five-ways-first-amendment-protects-your-speech-and-three-ways-it-does-not/
42. Your Rights Under the First Amendment | ACLU of Idaho, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.acluidaho.org/en/know-your-rights/your-rights-under-first-amendment
43. Social Movements and Sociological Systems Theory – Aarhus … – Pure, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/social-movements-and-sociological-systems-theory(f158305f-f5e4-4a50-892b-14e42a222672).html
44. Social Movements and Sociological Systems Theory | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307879540_Social_Movements_and_Sociological_Systems_Theory