Capital Punishment in the United States: A Comprehensive Analysis of a System in Decline

Introduction: The Rise and Fall of the Modern American Death Penalty

This report addresses the trajectory of capital punishment in the United States since its constitutional revival in 1976. A request for a simple chart of annual executions uncovers a dramatic and complex narrative: a slow restart following a Supreme Court-mandated moratorium, a rapid escalation to a peak in the late 1990s, and a sustained, significant decline throughout the 21st century. This trend is not a simple statistical artifact but the result of a complex interplay between landmark legal battles, shifting public and political sentiment, and the exposure of profound systemic flaws. The data reveals a system increasingly isolated, both geographically within the United States and internationally among peer nations. This analysis will deconstruct the quantitative data, explore the underlying legal and social drivers that have shaped this path, and provide a multi-faceted understanding of the current state and future prospects of capital punishment in America. It is a story of a policy whose practical application has diverged sharply from its theoretical justification, leading to a slow but steady erosion of its legal and moral foundation.

I. The Constitutional Architecture of American Capital Punishment

The modern era of capital punishment in the United States is a legal construct born from constitutional crisis. Its history is not one of uninterrupted practice but of rupture, redesign, and continuous judicial recalibration. The entire legal framework governing the death penalty today was forged in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s declaration that the system, as it operated for centuries, was fundamentally incompatible with the nation’s founding principles. Understanding this legal architecture is essential to comprehending the trends, controversies, and statistics that define the American death penalty.

A. The Furman v. Georgia Rupture: A System Deemed “Cruel and Unusual”

The modern history of the American death penalty begins with its temporary end. In 1972, the Supreme Court’s decision in Furman v. Georgia effectively invalidated every capital punishment statute in the country, commuting the sentences of over 600 inmates on death row to life in prison and initiating a nationwide moratorium on executions.¹ The 5-4 decision was a fractured collection of opinions, but a majority converged on the conclusion that the death penalty, as it was then administered, violated the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of due process.³

The Court’s reasoning did not declare capital punishment to be per se unconstitutional. Instead, it focused on the arbitrary and capricious manner in which it was applied. The justices found that the existing laws gave juries unfettered discretion to impose death sentences, resulting in a system where the ultimate punishment was handed down randomly and infrequently.⁴ Justice Potter Stewart famously wrote that receiving a death sentence was as “cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual”.⁶ The system lacked any rational, objective standards to guide juries in distinguishing the few defendants who would be executed from the many who would be spared.

This lack of standards led to outcomes that were not just arbitrary but also discriminatory. The Court recognized that the death penalty was disproportionately applied to the poor and to racial minorities, particularly Black defendants.⁵ Justice William O. Douglas argued that the system was “pregnant with discrimination,” allowing prejudice to infect the most consequential decision in the criminal justice system.⁴ By striking down the existing statutes, the Court did not abolish the death penalty outright but rather issued a constitutional challenge: states that wished to reinstate capital punishment would have to fundamentally redesign their laws to eliminate the arbitrariness and discrimination that had rendered the old system unconstitutional.⁴

B. The Gregg v. Georgia Reinstatement: Crafting a “Constitutional” Death Penalty

In the wake of Furman, 35 states and the federal government scrambled to rewrite their capital punishment laws to meet the Court’s new constitutional requirements.⁴ This effort culminated in a series of five cases decided on July 2, 1976, chief among them

Gregg v. Georgia. In Gregg, the Supreme Court approved a new model of capital sentencing, holding that “the punishment of death does not invariably violate the Constitution” and reinstating it as a legal penalty.²

The Georgia statute upheld in Gregg introduced a set of procedural safeguards intended to remedy the flaws identified in Furman. These reforms became the blueprint for the modern American death penalty system and included several key features:

1. Bifurcated Trials: The trial process was split into two distinct phases. The first is the guilt-innocence phase, where the jury determines whether the defendant committed a capital crime. If the defendant is found guilty, the trial moves to a separate penalty phase, where the same jury decides whether the sentence should be life imprisonment or death.⁷
2. Guided Discretion: To rein in the “untrammeled discretion” condemned in Furman, the new statutes required juries to find the presence of at least one specific “aggravating factor” beyond a reasonable doubt before they could even consider imposing a death sentence.⁵ These factors, enumerated in the statute, were meant to narrow the class of defendants eligible for the death penalty to the “worst of the worst.”
3. Consideration of Mitigating Evidence: In Lockett v. Ohio (1978), the Court clarified a crucial component of the new system, ruling that the defense must be allowed to present any and all “mitigating evidence” related to the defendant’s character, record, or the circumstances of the offense.⁸ This ensures an individualized sentencing determination, allowing the jury to consider reasons for sparing a defendant’s life.
4. Automatic Appellate Review: The new statutes mandated an automatic appeal of all death sentences to the state’s highest court.⁷ This review was designed to ensure consistency and proportionality in the application of the death penalty across the state.

With these procedural protections in place, the Court concluded that a carefully drafted capital punishment statute could direct and limit the jury’s discretion, thereby reducing the risk of arbitrary and capricious sentencing.⁵ This decision ended the four-year moratorium and opened the door for executions to resume, setting the stage for the modern era of capital punishment.

C. Judicial Contraction: The Supreme Court’s Narrowing of the Death Penalty’s Scope

The framework established in Gregg did not end the Supreme Court’s involvement in shaping the death penalty. Over the subsequent decades, the Court continued to refine and contract the scope of capital punishment, creating categorical exemptions for certain classes of offenders and offenses. These decisions were often grounded in the Eighth Amendment’s “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society,” reflecting a growing consensus against executing certain vulnerable populations or applying the ultimate penalty for crimes less severe than murder.²

Several landmark cases illustrate this trend of judicial contraction:

• Proportionality for the Crime: In Coker v. Georgia (1977), the Court ruled that imposing the death penalty for the rape of an adult woman was grossly disproportionate and therefore unconstitutional.⁸ This established a critical proportionality principle: the punishment must fit the crime. The Court extended this logic in
  Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008), striking down a statute that allowed the death penalty for the rape of a child where the victim did not die. The ruling effectively limited the death penalty’s application to crimes involving the death of the victim, with rare exceptions like treason or espionage.⁵
• Exclusion of Individuals with Intellectual Disability: In Atkins v. Virginia (2002), the Court held that executing individuals with what was then termed “mental retardation” violates the Eighth Amendment.⁸ The Court reasoned that their diminished cognitive abilities lessen their culpability, making the ultimate penalty of death excessively cruel.⁵ This decision overturned the Court’s own 1989 ruling in
  Penry v. Lynaugh and reflected a growing national and international consensus against such executions.²
• Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders: The Court took another major step in Roper v. Simmons (2005), banning the death penalty for individuals who were under the age of 18 when they committed their crimes.⁷ Citing scientific evidence on adolescent brain development, the Court noted juveniles’ lack of maturity, greater vulnerability to negative influences, and incomplete character development as factors that diminish their culpability.⁵ This ruling invalidated the laws in 22 states and affected dozens of inmates on death row.⁷

The legal history of the modern death penalty is defined by a persistent and unresolved tension between the state’s authority to impose the ultimate punishment and the constitutional mandate that it do so fairly, reliably, and non-arbitrarily. The initial framework of Gregg was presented as a solution to the chaos identified in Furman. However, the subsequent decades of litigation and judicial intervention demonstrate that the Gregg procedures were not a complete fix. The Court found it necessary to step in repeatedly to declare that even with these new procedural safeguards, applying the death penalty to certain groups or for certain crimes was fundamentally “cruel and unusual.” This reveals that the legal architecture is not a static edifice but a dynamic battlefield. The system has proven inherently prone to producing outcomes that society and the Court later deem unacceptable, leading to a reactive, piecemeal process of contraction rather than a proactively just system. This ongoing need for judicial correction is a central theme of the death penalty’s modern history and a key factor in its eventual decline.

II. A Statistical Autopsy of Capital Punishment (1976-Present)

The story of the modern American death penalty is told most vividly through its statistics. The numbers reveal a policy characterized by dramatic shifts in usage, extreme geographic concentration, and persistent racial disparities. An analysis of the data on executions, death row populations, and the demographics of the condemned provides a quantitative foundation for understanding the forces that have propelled the system’s rise and fall.

A. Executions Over Time: The Bell Curve of a Controversial Policy

Following the Gregg decision, executions did not resume immediately. The first execution of the modern era took place in Utah in 1977.² The pace remained slow through the early 1980s as states navigated the new legal landscape. However, the number of executions began to climb steadily throughout the late 1980s and 1990s, fueled by public and political support for “tough on crime” policies.²

This escalation reached its apex in 1999, when 98 people were executed in the United States, the highest number in any year of the modern era. Since that peak, the use of the death penalty has entered a period of sustained and dramatic decline.¹² By 2022, the number of executions had fallen to 18, and in 2023, it was 24.¹³ These figures, representing a drop of over 75% from the 1999 peak, are near the historic lows for the modern era and signal a fundamental shift in the application of capital punishment in the country. In total, 1,635 people have been executed in the United States since 1976.⁷

Table 1: Annual Executions in the United States, 1976-2023

Year	Number of Executions	Year	Number of Executions	Year	Number of Executions
1976	0	1992	31	2008	37
1977	1	1993	38	2009	52
1978	0	1994	31	2010	46
1979	2	1995	56	2011	43
1980	0	1996	45	2012	43
1981	1	1997	74	2013	39
1982	2	1998	68	2014	35
1983	5	1999	98	2015	28
1984	21	2000	85	2016	20
1985	18	2001	66	2017	23
1986	18	2002	71	2018	25
1987	25	2003	65	2019	22
1988	11	2004	59	2020	17
1989	16	2005	60	2021	11
1990	23	2006	53	2022	18
1991	14	2007	42	2023	24

Source: Death Penalty Information Center, Bureau of Justice Statistics.¹³

B. The Death Row Population: A Leading Indicator of a System in Decline

The number of people on death row provides a crucial, and perhaps more telling, metric for the health of the capital punishment system. Like the execution rate, the death row population saw a dramatic increase following Gregg. It grew from 420 in 1976 to a peak of 3,593 in 2000.¹⁶ However, since that peak, the size of the nation’s death row has declined for 22 consecutive years.¹⁴ By the end of 2023, the death row population had fallen to 2,241, a decrease of nearly 40% from its highest point.¹⁶

This steady decline is a powerful indicator of the system’s contraction. A significant disconnect exists between the number of annual executions and the much larger annual drop in the death row population. For example, in 2022, there were 18 executions, but the total number of people on death row decreased by 86 (from 2,331 at the end of 2021 to 2,270 at the end of 2022).¹⁴ This means that for every person executed, nearly four others left death row for other reasons. These other outcomes include having their sentences commuted by a governor, being exonerated and found innocent, dying of natural causes or suicide, or having their death sentences overturned by appellate courts and being resentenced to life in prison or less.¹⁷ This phenomenon reveals that the system is not merely slowing down in its use of executions; it is also breaking down in its ability to produce sentences that withstand legal scrutiny. The high rate of reversals and exonerations points to a system fraught with error at the trial level, a key factor contributing to its overall decline.

Table 2: U.S. Death Row Population by Year, 1976-2023

Year	Number on Death Row	Year	Number on Death Row	Year	Number on Death Row
1976	420	1992	2,575	2008	3,207
1977	423	1993	2,716	2009	3,173
1978	482	1994	2,890	2010	3,158
1979	539	1995	3,054	2011	3,082
1980	691	1996	3,219	2012	3,033
1981	856	1997	3,335	2013	2,979
1982	1,050	1998	3,452	2014	2,942
1983	1,209	1999	3,527	2015	2,881
1984	1,405	2000	3,593	2016	2,814
1985	1,591	2001	3,581	2017	2,768
1986	1,781	2002	3,557	2018	2,690
1987	1,984	2003	3,374	2019	2,620
1988	2,124	2004	3,315	2020	2,528
1989	2,250	2005	3,254	2021	2,436
1990	2,356	2006	3,228	2022	2,331
1991	2,482	2007	3,215	2023	2,241

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, NAACP Legal Defense Fund.¹⁶

C. The Geography of Capital Punishment: State and County-Level Concentration

The application of the death penalty in the United States is not a national phenomenon but one of extreme geographic concentration. The overwhelming majority of executions take place in a handful of states, primarily in the South. Since 1976, the Southern region has been responsible for 1,336 of the 1,635 total executions, which is over 82% of the national total.⁷

Texas is, by a vast margin, the leading execution state, accounting for 595 executions in the modern era—more than the next six states combined.⁷ Following Texas are Oklahoma (125), Virginia (113, though it has since abolished the penalty), Florida (106), and Missouri (100).¹⁸ When adjusted for population, the disparity remains stark. Oklahoma has the highest per-capita execution rate in the nation, at 3.1 executions per 100,000 residents, followed by Texas (1.89) and Missouri (1.62).¹⁹ This demonstrates that an individual is far more likely to be executed for a capital crime in these states than anywhere else in the country.

This concentration is even more pronounced at the county level. Research has shown that a mere 2% of counties in the U.S. are responsible for over 60% of the individuals on state death rows.²⁰ A small number of populous counties, often with aggressive, “muscle memory” prosecutorial offices, drive the death sentencing rates for their entire states and for the nation as a whole.²¹ This hyper-localization stands in direct contradiction to the constitutional goal of a non-arbitrary death penalty. The

Gregg decision was intended to ensure that the death penalty was reserved for the most heinous crimes, not for crimes that happen to occur in a specific prosecutorial district. The data clearly shows that geography, a legally irrelevant factor, is one of the most powerful determinants of whether a defendant receives a death sentence.

Table 3: Cumulative Executions by State and Region, 1976-Present (Top 10 States)

State	Region	Total Executions (since 1976)	Executions per 100,000 Residents
Texas	South	595	1.889
Oklahoma	South	127	3.101
Virginia*	South	113	1.282
Florida	South	106	0.454
Missouri	Midwest	101	1.617
Georgia	South	77	0.689
Alabama	South	78	1.512
Ohio	Midwest	56	0.471
South Carolina	South	45	0.821
North Carolina	South	43	0.389
U.S. Total	All	1,635	N/A

Note: Virginia abolished the death penalty in 2021. Data is cumulative since 1976. Per capita rates as of 2024..⁷

D. Demographics of the Condemned: An Examination of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender

The demographic data on capital punishment reveals stark and persistent disparities, particularly concerning race. These disparities exist both in the racial makeup of defendants on death row and in the racial dynamics between defendant and victim, raising profound questions about equal protection under the law.

The death penalty is overwhelmingly applied to men. As of early 2024, women constituted just 2.12% of the total death row population, and only 18 women have been executed since 1976.⁷

The racial disparities are far more pronounced. Black people make up approximately 13% of the U.S. population, yet they account for 33.9% of all executions since 1976 and over 40% of the current death row population.⁷ White defendants, while making up the majority of those executed (55.9%), are represented on death row at a rate far lower than their proportion of those who commit murder.⁷

Perhaps the most compelling evidence of racial bias lies in the race of the victim. While roughly half of all homicide victims in the U.S. are white, approximately 80% of all capital cases involve white victims.²⁴ The disparity in outcomes is staggering: since 1976, 178 Black defendants have been executed for the murder of white victims, whereas only 12 white defendants have been executed for the murder of Black victims.²⁴ Studies in numerous states, including North Carolina, Florida, and Pennsylvania, have consistently found that a defendant is several times more likely to receive a death sentence if the victim was white.²⁴ This suggests a systemic devaluation of Black lives within the capital punishment system, where the decision to seek the ultimate penalty is influenced by the race of the person who was killed.

This combination of geographic and racial arbitrariness demonstrates a fundamental failure of the modern death penalty to achieve the constitutional goals set forth in Gregg v. Georgia. The promise of a system that reserves the ultimate penalty for the “worst of the worst” in a consistent and non-discriminatory manner has not been realized. Instead, the data reveals a system where the likelihood of being executed is heavily influenced by the two external, legally irrelevant factors of where the crime was committed and the race of the victim.

Table 4: Racial and Ethnic Demographics of Executed Defendants and Death Row Inmates vs. U.S. Population

Race/Ethnicity	% of U.S. Population	% of Death Row Inmates	% of Executed Defendants (since 1976)
White	~60%	42.4%	55.9%
Black	~13%	40.3%	33.9%
Latino/a	~19%	14.6%	8.3%
Other	~8%	2.8%	1.9%

Note: Percentages are approximate and may vary slightly between data sources. Death row demographics as of mid-2024..⁷

III. The Fracturing Consensus: State and Federal Divergence

The national landscape of capital punishment is no longer monolithic. What was once a near-universal policy has fractured into a patchwork of distinct legal realities. A growing number of states have abandoned the practice entirely, while others maintain it in law but have ceased executions in practice. This divergence is further complicated by a federal death penalty system that operates on a separate, and often contradictory, political track. This fragmentation reflects a deep and growing national ambivalence about the death penalty’s fairness, efficacy, and morality.

A. The Abolitionist Wave: The State-by-State Retreat from Capital Punishment

A clear and accelerating trend of the 21st century has been the state-level abandonment of capital punishment. As of 2024, 23 states, along with the District of Columbia, have abolished the death penalty.¹ This abolitionist movement has gained significant momentum in recent years, with several states that had long histories of capital punishment joining the ranks of those without it.

This wave of abolition has been driven by both legislative action and judicial rulings.

• Legislative Abolition: States like Virginia (2021), Colorado (2020), New Hampshire (2019), Maryland (2013), Illinois (2011), New Mexico (2009), and New Jersey (2007) have all repealed their death penalty statutes through the legislative process.⁹ The abolition in Virginia was particularly significant, as it was the first Southern state to do so and had historically been one of the nation’s leading execution states.¹
• Judicial Abolition: In other states, high courts have struck down the death penalty as unconstitutional under their state constitutions. The Washington Supreme Court did so in 2018, citing the law’s “arbitrary and racially biased” application.⁹ Similarly, the Delaware Supreme Court invalidated its state’s capital punishment statute in 2016, ruling that it violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.⁹

These actions reflect a growing consensus at the state level that the death penalty system is broken beyond repair. The reasons cited often echo the broader national concerns: the unacceptable risk of executing an innocent person, the demonstrable racial and geographic disparities, and the exorbitant costs that divert resources from more effective public safety measures.³

Table 5: Legal Status of Capital Punishment by U.S. Jurisdiction

Category	States and Jurisdictions	Total
Abolitionist	Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, District of Columbia	23 States + D.C.
Active with Death Penalty	Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wyoming	27 States
Moratorium in Place	California, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania	4 States
Federal Government & Military	U.S. Government, U.S. Military (Moratorium on federal executions since July 2021)	2 Jurisdictions

Source: Death Penalty Information Center, National Conference of State Legislatures.⁹ Note: Some states with the death penalty have not carried out an execution in over a decade.¹

B. Executions on Hold: The Rise of Gubernatorial Moratoriums

In several states, the death penalty exists in a state of legal limbo. While the punishment remains on the books, governors have imposed formal moratoriums, halting all executions. This is the case in California, Pennsylvania, and Oregon, with Ohio’s governor also indicating no executions will proceed due to practical challenges.¹ These states collectively house hundreds of inmates on their death rows. California alone has the nation’s largest death row, with over 660 individuals, but has not carried out an execution since 2006.¹⁴

The rationale for these moratoriums is explicit. Governors like Gavin Newsom of California have declared the state’s death penalty system “a failure” by every measure, citing its exorbitant cost, its racial bias, and the ever-present risk of executing an innocent person.²⁵ These executive actions create a “death penalty in name only,” where sentences continue to be handed down but are never carried out. This situation highlights the deep conflict between the legal authorization of capital punishment and the growing political and moral unwillingness to implement it. It underscores the system’s dysfunction, as states spend millions of dollars to secure death sentences that have no realistic chance of being enforced.

C. The Federal Death Penalty: A Separate and Politicized Trajectory

The federal death penalty operates on a track largely independent of state-level trends and is uniquely susceptible to the political priorities of the executive branch. After the Furman decision, the federal system remained dormant for decades, with no executions occurring between 1963 and 2001.¹¹ Congress formally revived it with the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 and significantly expanded it with the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which made dozens of additional crimes eligible for capital punishment.²

Despite this legal expansion, its use remained rare. Only three federal executions were carried out between 2001 and 2003, followed by a 17-year hiatus.¹¹ This changed dramatically in the final six months of the Trump administration. In a stunning break with the national trend of decline, the federal government executed 13 people between July 2020 and January 2021.¹ This spree was unprecedented in the modern era, with more federal executions carried out in that short period than in the previous 70 years combined.¹¹

This surge was not driven by a spike in federal capital crimes but by a deliberate policy decision from the Department of Justice to resume executions. The subsequent administration reversed course just as quickly. On July 1, 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland imposed a new moratorium on federal executions, pending a review of the policies and procedures that led to the unprecedented series of executions.¹

This rapid oscillation between aggressive use and complete halt demonstrates that the federal death penalty functions as a distinct political instrument. Its application is less a reflection of national consensus or crime rates and more a tool of the incumbent administration’s ideological agenda on law and order. This makes the federal system uniquely volatile and politically charged, capable of producing outcomes that run directly counter to the broader legal and social currents shaping capital punishment in the states.

IV. Systemic Cracks: The Forces Driving the Decline

The steady decline in the use of capital punishment in the United States is not attributable to a single cause but to a confluence of systemic failures and practical challenges that have eroded its support among the public, the legal community, and policymakers. The exposure of an alarming rate of wrongful convictions, the policy’s staggering financial burden, the practical difficulties of carrying out executions, and the profound human toll on all involved have collectively weakened the foundation of the American death penalty.

A. The Innocence Epidemic: Wrongful Convictions and the Specter of Irreversible Error

Perhaps the single most powerful factor driving the decline of the death penalty is the growing awareness of its fallibility. The system’s promise to deliver the ultimate punishment only to the truly guilty has been shattered by the undeniable reality of wrongful convictions. Since 1973, at least 200 individuals who were sentenced to death have been exonerated—meaning they were acquitted of all charges, had all charges dismissed by the prosecution, or were granted a pardon based on evidence of innocence.³⁰

This number translates into a shocking ratio: for every eight people executed in the United States in the modern era, one person has been exonerated from death row.⁶ This is not a problem of isolated mistakes but evidence of a systemic vulnerability to error. The leading causes of these wrongful convictions are not simple accidents but deep-seated flaws in the justice process. Official misconduct by police or prosecutors is a factor in 69% of all death row exonerations, and perjury or false accusation is present in 67.6% of cases.³² These problems are even more acute in cases involving defendants of color. Official misconduct contributed to the wrongful convictions of 79% of Black exonerees and 69% of Latinx exonerees, compared to 58% of white exonerees.³²

The stories behind the statistics are harrowing. The case of Walter McMillian in Alabama, exonerated in 1993 after spending six years on death row for a crime he did not commit, exposed a system rife with coerced testimony and withheld evidence.³⁵ Even more chilling is the case of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his three daughters. Multiple leading arson experts later concluded that the forensic evidence used to convict him was based on junk science and that the fire was almost certainly accidental, raising the strong possibility that Texas executed an innocent man.³⁷

The risk of making such an irreversible error has had a profound impact on public and judicial opinion. It transforms the debate from a philosophical one about retribution to a practical one about competence and risk. The constant stream of exonerations demonstrates that the procedural safeguards established in Gregg have been insufficient to prevent the conviction of the innocent, a failure that strikes at the very legitimacy of the state’s power to kill.

Table 6: Death Row Exonerations by State and Race, 1973-Present (Top 5 States)

State	Total Exonerations	Black Exonerees	White Exonerees	Latino/a Exonerees
Florida	30	17	11	2
Illinois*	22	16	6	0
Texas	16	7	5	4
Louisiana	12	10	2	0
Ohio	11	7	4	0
U.S. Total	200	108	70	19

Note: Illinois abolished the death penalty in 2011. Data as of 2024..³¹

B. The High Cost of Death: Economic Realities and Shifting Priorities

Beyond the moral and legal arguments, a powerful pragmatic force driving the death penalty’s decline is its exorbitant cost. Contrary to the popular assumption that execution is cheaper than life imprisonment, the opposite is true. Capital cases are orders of magnitude more expensive than non-capital murder trials.²¹ These elevated costs stem from multiple factors, including longer and more complex pre-trial investigations, the use of expert witnesses in fields like forensics and mental health, lengthy jury selection processes, bifurcated trials, and, most significantly, a mandatory and multi-layered appeals process that can last for decades.²¹

The financial burden is staggering. Studies have consistently shown that the death penalty is a drain on public resources. In California, the system costs an estimated $137 million per year more than a system whose maximum penalty is life without parole.³⁸ In Texas, the costs of capital cases are so high that they have been shown to impact county budgets, leading to reduced public safety expenditures in other areas.³⁸ This economic reality has changed the calculus for prosecutors and lawmakers. In an era of tight budgets, many are concluding that the death penalty is an inefficient and wasteful policy. The funds spent on a single capital case could be used to hire more police officers, fund victim services, or invest in crime prevention programs that offer a better return on public safety.³⁸ This argument has proven particularly persuasive to fiscal conservatives, creating a bipartisan coalition of opposition in some states.

C. The Challenge of Lethal Injection and Botched Executions

In recent years, states have faced a growing practical obstacle to carrying out executions: the availability of lethal injection drugs. Due to ethical objections, major pharmaceutical manufacturers in the U.S. and Europe have refused to supply their products for use in executions.⁴⁰ This has led to a nationwide shortage of the traditionally used drugs, such as sodium thiopental and pentobarbital.

In response, states have scrambled for alternatives, leading to a period of experimentation and legal challenges. Some have turned to compounding pharmacies, which are not federally regulated, to obtain drugs of uncertain quality and potency. Others have adopted new, untested protocols or sought to revive older methods of execution. Alabama became the first state to use nitrogen hypoxia, a method that had never been used before, in an execution in 2024.¹² South Carolina has authorized the use of the firing squad and electrocution as alternatives.⁹

This turn to new and untried methods has led to a series of botched executions, where inmates have shown visible signs of extreme pain and suffering on the gurney. These incidents have fueled legal challenges arguing that these new protocols constitute cruel and unusual punishment, and they have further eroded public and judicial confidence in the state’s ability to carry out executions humanely and competently.¹² The logistical and legal chaos surrounding lethal injection has created yet another barrier to the implementation of the death penalty, causing lengthy delays and contributing to its decline.

D. The Human Toll: Perspectives from Victims’ Families and Corrections Personnel

The abstract legal and statistical debates over capital punishment often obscure its profound human impact. The experience of those most directly affected—the families of murder victims and the corrections personnel tasked with carrying out executions—adds a crucial qualitative dimension to the analysis of the system’s flaws.

The common political rhetoric suggests that the death penalty is necessary to provide “closure” for victims’ families. However, the testimony of many families directly contradicts this claim. For them, the capital punishment process is not a source of healing but of prolonged trauma.³⁵ The decades-long cycle of appeals, hearings, and media attention forces them to relive their tragedy repeatedly. The focus remains fixed on the perpetrator, while their murdered loved one is often forgotten.⁴² The system can also be divisive, turning family members against one another if they disagree on the death penalty, and it creates an arbitrary “hierarchy of victims,” where cases that receive a death sentence are implicitly deemed more important than others.⁴³ Many families have come to oppose the death penalty after experiencing its painful and protracted reality, advocating instead for the certainty and finality of a life-without-parole sentence.⁴²

An often-overlooked group of victims are the prison workers who must carry out the executions. A growing body of evidence reveals the severe psychological toll this work takes. Wardens, guards, and members of execution teams report high rates of PTSD, depression, alcoholism, and suicide.⁴⁵ Many who initially supported capital punishment become ardent opponents after their direct involvement. They describe the experience as “life-altering trauma” and feel a profound sense of responsibility and regret.⁴⁶ Frank Thompson, a former prison superintendent in Oregon who oversaw two executions, concluded that the practice “does no more than increase the number of victims while producing no positive outcomes”.⁴⁵ This hidden human cost further complicates the moral calculus of capital punishment.

The high rate of exonerations has created a powerful feedback loop that drives the system’s decline. The undeniable risk of executing an innocent person has led to more intense, and therefore more expensive, legal challenges from defense attorneys and greater scrutiny from the courts. This soaring cost, in turn, makes fiscally conscious prosecutors and state legislatures reconsider the wisdom of pursuing the death penalty. The widespread availability of life without parole (LWOP) provides a “safe,” permanent, and far cheaper alternative that satisfies the public’s demand for severe punishment without the catastrophic risk of irreversible error. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle: as fewer death sentences are sought and imposed, the legal and political infrastructure needed to support the practice begins to atrophy, further accelerating its decline.

V. The United States in a Global Context

The status of capital punishment in the United States cannot be fully understood in isolation. When placed in an international context, the U.S. practice becomes a stark outlier, particularly among its democratic allies and peer nations. This global isolation has tangible diplomatic and legal consequences and shapes how the American death penalty is perceived both at home and abroad.

A. An Outlier Among Democracies

There is a clear and overwhelming global trend away from capital punishment. More than 70% of the world’s countries have abolished the death penalty in law or in practice.⁴⁷ This trend is especially pronounced among developed, democratic nations. The United States is the only Western industrialized nation to continue to carry out executions.³⁹ It is the only member of the G7, a group of the world’s leading economies, that still uses the death penalty.⁴⁸ In the Americas, the U.S. has been the only country to carry out executions since 2008.⁴⁹

This places the United States in the company of a small and shrinking group of retentionist countries. The top five executing nations in the world are consistently China (which executes thousands annually, though the exact numbers are a state secret), Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United States.¹³ This alignment with nations that have vastly different records on human rights and due process creates significant diplomatic friction and undermines American claims to be a global leader on human rights.⁴⁷

This outlier status has practical legal consequences. Many abolitionist countries, including close U.S. allies, have laws or policies that prohibit them from extraditing a defendant to a country where they could face the death penalty.⁴⁷ This can complicate international law enforcement efforts and creates a barrier to cooperation in transnational criminal cases. Furthermore, international human rights law, while not explicitly banning the death penalty, has been interpreted to prohibit its application to juvenile offenders and to impose strict due process requirements—standards that have been cited by U.S. Supreme Court justices in their own constitutional analyses.⁴⁷ While international pressure is not the primary driver of domestic policy, it adds another layer of criticism and complexity to the American system, reinforcing the arguments of domestic opponents and highlighting the growing chasm between U.S. practice and global norms.

Conclusion: A System in Irreversible Decline

The trajectory of capital punishment in the United States since 1976 is one of profound contradiction and ultimate decline. Born from a constitutional mandate to be fair, reliable, and non-arbitrary, the modern death penalty system has, in practice, failed to meet these fundamental requirements. The precipitous drop in executions and death sentences from their peak in the late 1990s is not a temporary dip but a long-term trend driven by a powerful convergence of forces.

The legal architecture, while permitting the death penalty, has been steadily constrained by the Supreme Court, which has been forced to intervene repeatedly to curb its most excessive applications. The statistical evidence paints a damning portrait of a system that is not only geographically and racially arbitrary—undermining the core principle of equal justice—but is also plagued by an unacceptably high rate of error. The exoneration of 200 people from death row is a testament to the system’s fallibility and raises the intolerable specter of wrongful execution.

These deep-seated systemic flaws have, in turn, fueled a growing chorus of opposition grounded in practical concerns. The policy’s immense financial cost, its lack of a proven deterrent effect, and the logistical chaos surrounding lethal injections have led prosecutors, lawmakers, and the public to question its value as an instrument of public policy. The profound human toll it exacts on victims’ families, who are subjected to decades of legal limbo, and on the corrections officials tasked with carrying it out, has stripped away its moral authority.

The result is a fractured and fading institution. A growing majority of states have abandoned it, and even in those that retain it, its use is concentrated in an ever-smaller number of outlier counties. While the death penalty is unlikely to disappear entirely in the immediate future, particularly given the political volatility of the federal system, its foundation has been irrevocably weakened. The data and trends analyzed in this report strongly suggest that the United States is on a slow but steady path toward joining the vast majority of the world’s nations in abandoning this ultimate, and ultimately flawed, punishment.

Works cited

1. Capital punishment in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States
2. The History of the Death Penalty: A Timeline, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/history-of-the-death-penalty-timeline
3. Death Row USA: Death Penalty Cases and Statistics by State – Legal Defense Fund, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.naacpldf.org/our-thinking/death-row-usa/
4. U.S. Supreme Court Reinstates the Death Penalty | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/us-supreme-court-reinstates-death-penalty
5. death penalty | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/death_penalty
6. Death Penalty | Equal Justice Initiative, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://eji.org/issues/death-penalty/
7. Facts about the Death Penalty – dpic-cdn.org, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://dpic-cdn.org/production/documents/pdf/FactSheet.pdf
8. Summaries of Key Supreme Court Cases Related to the Death Penalty, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://capitalpunishmentincontext.org/resources/casesummaries
9. States and Capital Punishment – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/civil-and-criminal-justice/states-and-capital-punishment
10. Death Penalty & Criminal Sentencing Supreme Court Cases, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/death-penalty-criminal-sentencing/
11. Capital punishment by the United States federal government – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_the_United_States_federal_government
12. Executions Overview – Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions/executions-overview
13. Executions Around the World | Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/policy/international/executions-around-the-world
14. Capital Punishment, 2022 – Statistical Tables, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/cp22st.pdf
15. Executions by State and Year – Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions/executions-overview/executions-by-state-and-year
16. Size of Death Row by Year | Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-row/overview/size-of-death-row-by-year
17. Death Penalty Census, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/data/death-penalty-census
18. Death Row in the United States [2024]: A Statistical Analysis, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.criminaldefenseteam.com/death-row-in-the-united-states/
19. State Execution Rates (through 2024) – Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/state-execution-rates
20. Race and the Death Penalty – NACDL, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.nacdl.org/Content/Race-and-the-Death-Penalty
21. What’s Behind the Decline in the Death Penalty? | The Marshall …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.themarshallproject.org/2017/10/02/what-s-behind-the-decline-in-the-death-penalty
22. The American Death Penalty Decline – Scholarly Commons, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7612&context=jclc
23. Racial Demographics – Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-row/overview/demographics
24. Race and the Death Penalty | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/documents/race-and-death-penalty
25. State by State | Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/state-and-federal-info/state-by-state
26. Which States Have the Death Sentence? | Richard P. Davies, Esq., accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.richardpdavieslaw.com/death-penalty/which-states-have-the-death-sentence/
27. How many people are sentenced to death in America? – USAFacts, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-people-are-sentenced-to-death-in-america/
28. Federal Executions – Capital Punishment. – BOP, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.bop.gov/about/history/federal_executions.jsp
29. The Federal Death Penalty System: Supplementary Data, Analysis and Revised Protocols, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archive/dag/pubdoc/deathpenaltystudy.htm
30. Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/
31. Innocence – Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/policy/innocence
32. Misconduct and Wrongful Convictions – Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/policy/prosecutorial-accountability/misconduct-and-wrongful-convictions
33. New Innocence Report From DPIC Adds 11 New Individuals to Capital Exoneration List, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/committees/death_penalty_representation/publications/project_blog/new-dpic-innocence-report-feb-2021/
34. Innocence and the Death Penalty, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://innocenceproject.org/innocence-and-the-death-penalty/
35. Walter McMillian – Equal Justice Initiative, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://eji.org/cases/walter-mcmillian/
36. List of exonerated death row inmates – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_exonerated_death_row_inmates
37. Cameron Todd Willingham’s Wrongful Execution Gains New …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.innocenceproject.org/cameron-todd-willingham-wrongfully-convicted-and-executed-in-texas/
38. Death Penalty | Pros, Cons, Debate, Arguments, Capital Punishment, Prison, Felony, & Life in Prison | Britannica, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/procon/death-penalty-debate
39. The Case Against the Death Penalty | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/documents/case-against-death-penalty
40. A look at the status of US executions in 2025, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/us-executions-2025-4d66564aeb70cb2df1493b77d7110155
41. Status of the death penalty laws in 2022 – Supplemental Document, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/cp22st-sodp2022.pdf
42. A Failure for Victims’ Families – Equal Justice USA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://ejusa.org/resource/the-closure-myth/a-failure-for-victims-families/
43. The death penalty has failed victims’ families – Conservatives Concerned, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://conservativesconcerned.org/resource/families/
44. THE IMPACT OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ON FAMILIES OF DEFENDANTS AND MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS – IN.gov – Indiana, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://secure.in.gov/ipdc/files/Judicature-article-on-families.pdf
45. NPR Investigation: The Death Penalty’s Second Casualty — the Execution Staff, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/npr-investigation-the-death-penaltys-second-casualty-the-execution-staff
46. The Death Penalty and Regret – Equal Justice Initiative, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://eji.org/news/the-death-penalty-and-regret/
47. International | Death Penalty Information Center, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/policy/international
48. Death penalty statistics, country by country | visualisation and data – The Guardian, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/mar/29/death-penalty-countries-world
49. Capital punishment by country – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_country
50. Global: Executions soar to highest number in almost a decade – Amnesty International, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/05/global-executions-soar-highest-number-in-decade/