The Architectural Revolution: How the ADA Redesigned America’s Social Blueprint

Introduction: A World of Invisible Walls

Imagine a world where the simple act of entering a neighborhood store, boarding a city bus, applying for a job, or visiting a courthouse is obstructed by invisible, yet insurmountable, walls.¹

For millions of Americans with disabilities, this was not a hypothetical scenario but the pervasive, daily reality prior to 1990.

Discrimination was not merely a matter of individual prejudice; it was structurally embedded into the physical and social architecture of the nation, rendering full participation in society impossible.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 was more than just another law; it was a revolutionary new blueprint designed to systematically identify and dismantle these barriers, rebuilding American society on a foundation of accessibility and equal opportunity.²

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of this landmark antidiscrimination measure.

It begins by examining the pre-ADA landscape of exclusion and the legislative precursor that, while groundbreaking, proved insufficient.

It then chronicles the powerful advocacy of the disability rights movement that demanded fundamental change.

The core of the report deconstructs the architectural blueprint of the Act itself—its five foundational titles and the crucial legal definition of “disability.” Finally, it analyzes the subsequent renovations made to this blueprint through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 and assesses the ADA’s profound and lasting legacy, including its tangible successes, its persistent challenges, and the unfinished work that remains in building a truly inclusive nation.

Part I: The Faulty Foundation: The Landscape of Discrimination Before 1990

To understand the revolutionary nature of the ADA, one must first survey the terrain it was designed to transform.

Before 1990, American society was, for people with disabilities, a landscape of exclusion built upon a faulty foundation of legal neglect and social segregation.

A Society of Segregation

For much of American history, society tended to “isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities”.³

This was not passive neglect but often active policy.

In a stark example, numerous cities, including Chicago and San Francisco, enacted ordinances known colloquially as “ugly laws,” which made it illegal for people deemed “diseased, maimed, mutilated, or in any way deformed” to be seen in public.⁵

This systemic exclusion fostered a widespread belief that the problems faced by people with disabilities—such as staggering rates of unemployment and a lack of educational opportunities—were the “inevitable consequences” of the physical or mental limitations imposed by the disability itself.³

The problem was seen as residing within the individual, not within a society that had failed to accommodate them.

The Precursor and Its Limits: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

A monumental shift occurred with the passage of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

This was the first major civil rights legislation in the United States protecting people with disabilities from discrimination.³

Its power lay in a radical reframing of the issue.

For the first time, the exclusion and segregation of people with disabilities were legally defined as

discrimination, akin to discrimination based on race or sex.³

Section 504 also established people with disabilities as a protected “class” or minority group, a critical step that helped unify disparate disability-specific groups under the banner of a common civil rights struggle.³

However, this groundbreaking law contained a critical, ultimately fatal, limitation: its jurisdiction was restricted to programs and entities receiving federal financial assistance.⁶

While it protected an individual’s rights in a federally funded hospital or a public university, it offered no protection in a privately-owned restaurant, a local movie theater, or the vast majority of private-sector workplaces.

This created a legislative vacuum, leaving most areas of public life untouched by nondiscrimination mandates.⁷

This duality rendered Section 504 both a radical success and a profound failure.

Its success was ideological; it fundamentally changed the legal concept of disability from a personal medical problem to a public civil rights issue.

Its failure was practical; its limited scope meant that for most people with disabilities, the newly recognized “right” to nondiscrimination existed in theory but not in their daily interactions with the private sector.

This created an untenable legal and moral inconsistency.

If discrimination was wrong in a federally funded library, advocates could powerfully ask, why was it acceptable in the privately-owned bookstore next door? The ADA was not born from a new idea, but from the logical and moral necessity to complete Section 504’s unfinished revolution.

Part II: The Demand for a New Blueprint: The Rise of the Disability Rights Movement

The ADA was not granted by a benevolent legislature; it was demanded by a powerful and organized social movement.

Forged in decades of struggle, the disability rights movement grew into a sophisticated political force that successfully compelled Congress and the White House to act.

A Movement Forged in Struggle

Borrowing tactics directly from the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, disability rights advocates engaged in sit-ins, marches, and public protests to challenge their exclusion from society.³

A pivotal moment was the fight to force the issuance of regulations for Section 504.

After years of delay, the disability community mobilized nationwide, culminating in a 28-day sit-in at the San Francisco federal building in 1977.

This successful campaign not only secured the vital regulations that would later form the basis of the ADA but also forged a battle-hardened and unified political community.³

The “class status” concept established by Section 504 proved critical, fostering solidarity among people with vastly different disabilities.

This unity was repeatedly tested and proven strong, as the community resisted legislative attempts to divide them by excluding certain groups, such as individuals with AIDS or mental illness, from the ADA’s proposed protections.²

Building the Case for the ADA

The final push for the ADA was a masterclass in political strategy that fused raw, emotional, personal stories with sophisticated legislative maneuvering.

The movement understood that data and legal arguments alone were insufficient; they needed to make the abstract concept of “discrimination” a tangible, human reality for legislators.

This strategy unfolded on several fronts.

The National Council on Disability (NCD), an independent federal agency, played a key institutional role.

Its 1986 report, “Toward Independence,” called for comprehensive civil rights legislation, and the council proceeded to draft the first version of the ADA.²

Simultaneously, a grassroots effort gave voice to the millions affected.

Led by advocates like Justin Dart, who traveled to all 50 states, the movement compiled thousands of “discrimination diaries”—firsthand accounts of the barriers, indignities, and prejudices people with disabilities faced every day.

This powerful collection of personal stories was not merely for public awareness; it was delivered to Congress to form an undeniable “evidentiary basis for the ADA”.⁵

The strategy culminated in congressional hearings where personal narrative took center stage.

Lawmakers heard powerful testimony from advocates, parents, and even their own colleagues.

Legislators like Senator Lowell Weicker, who spoke of being a parent to a child with Down Syndrome, and Representative Tony Coelho, who recounted the discrimination he faced as a person with epilepsy, transformed the political debate into a human one.²

This fusion of personal story and political power was devastatingly effective.

The movement had successfully translated widespread, lived experience into a compelling political imperative, ensuring that the bill that became the ADA was not just a piece of legislation, but a collection of thousands of human stories demanding to be heard and acted upon.

Part III: The ADA of 1990: A Comprehensive Framework for Inclusion

On July 26, 1990, President George H.W.

Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act into law, calling it a “historic new civil rights Act” that would bring down the “shameful wall of exclusion”.⁹

The ADA was designed as a comprehensive architectural blueprint to rebuild American society.

Its stated purpose was “to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities” and to afford them protections similar to those based on race, religion, sex, and national origin.⁸

The law’s architecture is composed of five main sections, or “Titles,” each designed to address discrimination in a different sphere of public life.

Deconstructing the Blueprint: A Title-by-Title Analysis

• Title I – Employment: This title addresses discrimination in the workplace. It prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against “qualified individuals with disabilities” in any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, compensation, training, and promotion.² The central pillar of Title I is the concept of
  “reasonable accommodation.” This creates an affirmative obligation for employers to make changes to the job or work environment to allow an employee with a disability to perform the essential functions of their job. Examples include providing modified equipment, restructuring a job, or offering a flexible work schedule. This obligation holds unless the employer can demonstrate that the accommodation would cause an “undue hardship,” defined as a significant difficulty or expense.¹² Title I is enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).¹³
• Title II – State and Local Government Services: Title II extends the prohibition on discrimination to all programs, services, and activities of public entities, which includes state and local governments and their various departments.² Critically, this applies to all public entities, regardless of whether they receive federal funding, thus closing the major gap left by Section 504. This title mandates
  “program accessibility,” covering everything from physical access to government buildings like courthouses and schools, to ensuring that public transportation systems, such as buses and trains, are accessible.² It also contains the vital
  “integration mandate,” which requires that public entities provide services “in the most integrated setting appropriate,” a principle aimed at preventing unnecessary institutionalization and segregation that was later affirmed by the Supreme Court’s landmark Olmstead decision.⁶ Title II is enforced by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).¹²
• Title III – Public Accommodations and Services Operated by Private Entities: This title represents one of the ADA’s most significant expansions of civil rights, as it addresses discrimination by the private sector. It applies to “public accommodations,” a broad category of privately-owned facilities that are open to the public, such as restaurants, hotels, retail stores, theaters, doctor’s offices, private schools, and health clubs.² Title III’s key concept is
  “barrier removal.” It requires these private entities to remove architectural and communication barriers in existing buildings where doing so is “readily achievable” (easily accomplishable without much difficulty or expense). Furthermore, it mandates that all new construction and major alterations be fully accessible according to established standards.⁴ Title III is also enforced by the DOJ.¹²
• Title IV – Telecommunications: Title IV addresses barriers to communication. It mandates that telephone companies provide “telecommunications relay services” (TRS) nationwide, 24 hours a day. These services allow individuals with hearing or speech disabilities to communicate over the telephone, typically by using a teletypewriter (TTY) to communicate with a relay operator, who then speaks to the other party.² The goal is to provide a communication experience that is
  “functionally equivalent” to that of a person without a disability.¹⁷ This title also requires that public service announcements funded by the federal government be closed-captioned.¹² Title IV is enforced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).¹²
• Title V – Miscellaneous Provisions: This final title is a “catch-all” section containing various provisions that apply to the Act as a whole. It clarifies the ADA’s relationship to other federal and state laws, affirms that states are not immune from lawsuits under the Act, and addresses the role of insurance providers. Crucially, it includes a strong prohibition against retaliation and coercion, protecting individuals from being punished for exercising their rights under the ADA.² It also contains specific exclusions, clarifying, for example, that the current illegal use of drugs is not a covered disability.⁴

Table 1: The Five Titles of the ADA at a Glance
Title	Core Mandate	Applies To	Enforced By
Title I – Employment	Prohibits discrimination in employment; requires reasonable accommodation.	Private employers with 15+ employees, state and local governments, employment agencies, labor unions.	U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Title II – Public Services	Prohibits discrimination in public programs, services, and transportation.	State and local government entities (e.g., schools, courts, motor vehicle departments, public transit).	U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
Title III – Public Accommodations	Prohibits discrimination in private entities open to the public; requires accessibility in new construction and barrier removal in existing facilities.	Private businesses that are public accommodations (e.g., restaurants, hotels, retail stores, theaters, doctor’s offices).	U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
Title IV – Telecommunications	Requires functionally equivalent telephone relay services for individuals with hearing or speech disabilities.	Telephone and Internet companies.	Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Title V – Miscellaneous	Prohibits retaliation; clarifies relationship to other laws; defines certain exclusions.	All entities covered under Titles I-IV.	Varies depending on the specific provision.

Part IV: The Cornerstone of the Act: The Legal Definition of “Disability”

The entire protective structure of the ADA rests on a single cornerstone: the legal definition of “disability.” It is crucial to understand that in the context of the ADA, “disability” is a legal term of art, not a medical one.¹⁸

An individual does not need a specific diagnosis from a pre-approved list to be protected.

Instead, they must meet the criteria of a broad, three-pronged legal definition.

The Three-Prong Definition

The ADA defines an “individual with a disability” as a person who meets at least one of the following three criteria ²:

1. Prong One: Actual Disability: A person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. This is the most common path to coverage.

• A physical or mental impairment is broadly defined and includes a wide range of conditions, such as visual, speech, and hearing impairments; orthopedic conditions; cancer; heart disease; diabetes; epilepsy; emotional illness; and specific learning disabilities.¹⁹
• Major life activities are those that are fundamental to most people’s daily lives, such as walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, working, performing manual tasks, and caring for oneself.²

2. Prong Two: Record of Disability: A person who has a history or record of such a substantially limiting impairment. This prong protects individuals who may no longer have a disability but are discriminated against because of their past. A common example is a person with a history of cancer that is now in remission who is denied a job out of fear that the cancer might return.¹⁶
3. Prong Three: Regarded As Disabled: A person who is perceived or treated by others as having such an impairment. This prong applies even if the individual does not have an impairment, or has an impairment that is not substantially limiting.¹⁶

The third “regarded as” prong is arguably the most radical and purely “civil rights” component of the entire Act.

Its existence shifts the legal focus away from an individual’s actual medical condition and onto the discriminatory actions and attitudes of others.

It protects individuals who may have no functional limitations whatsoever but are subjected to prejudice based on myth, fear, or stereotype.

For example, a highly qualified applicant with severe facial scarring from an old burn might be denied a customer service job because the employer assumes, without evidence, that customers would be uncomfortable.²¹

This individual is not limited in any major life activity, but they are being “regarded as” disabled and are therefore protected.

This prong establishes that the problem the ADA seeks to solve is not the disability itself, but the societal reaction to it.

It is the legal embodiment of the principle that discrimination is rooted in prejudice, making the ADA a law that combats stigma itself.

Part V: Renovating the Blueprint: The ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA)

In the years after the ADA’s passage, a series of Supreme Court decisions began to chip away at its foundation.

These rulings interpreted the definition of “disability” far more narrowly than Congress had intended, excluding many people the law was meant to protect.³

Courts began to demand an “extensive analysis” to determine if a person was “truly” disabled, shifting the focus of litigation away from the discriminatory act and onto the plaintiff’s medical condition.²²

Most significantly, courts began considering the beneficial effects of “mitigating measures.” Under this interpretation, if a person’s impairment was well-managed with medication (like diabetes or epilepsy) or technology (like a hearing aid), they might no longer be considered “substantially limited” and would thus lose their ADA protections at the very moment they needed them.²²

The Solution: The ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA)

In a rare bipartisan effort, Congress responded directly to these court decisions by passing the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA), which took effect on January 1, 2009.²²

The explicit purpose of the ADAAA was to reject the narrow judicial interpretations and

restore the broad scope of protection originally intended by the ADA.²²

The ADAAA did not change the three-prong definition of disability itself, but it fundamentally changed the rules for how that definition must be interpreted.

Key Changes Mandated by the ADAAA

The ADAAA established several clear “rules of construction” for courts and employers to follow:

• “Construed Broadly”: The ADAAA mandates that the definition of disability “shall be construed in favor of broad coverage”.¹⁴ It clarified that the primary question in a disability discrimination case should be whether discrimination occurred, not whether the plaintiff meets an exacting standard of disability.²¹
• No Consideration of Mitigating Measures: In a direct reversal of the Supreme Court’s rulings, the ADAAA states that the beneficial effects of mitigating measures must not be considered when determining if an impairment is substantially limiting. This includes medication, medical equipment, prosthetics, hearing aids, and assistive technology. (The only exception is for ordinary eyeglasses and contact lenses).²²
• Expanded “Major Life Activities”: The definition of “major life activities” was expanded to explicitly include “major bodily functions.” This list includes, but is not limited to, the functions of the immune system, normal cell growth, and the digestive, bowel, bladder, neurological, brain, respiratory, circulatory, endocrine, and reproductive systems. This change clarified coverage for individuals with conditions like cancer, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and HIV.²¹
• Episodic or In-Remission Conditions: The ADAAA clarified that an impairment that is episodic or in remission (such as epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, or cancer) is considered a disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active.²¹

Table 2: Key Changes from the ADA to the ADAAA (2008)
Aspect of Definition	Pre-ADAAA Interpretation (Based on Court Rulings)	Post-ADAAA Interpretation (Mandated by Congress)
Overall Construction	Interpreted narrowly; required extensive analysis to prove disability.	Must be construed broadly in favor of coverage; should not require extensive analysis.
Mitigating Measures	Courts considered the positive effects of medication, hearing aids, etc. If an impairment was well-managed, it might not be a disability.	The positive effects of mitigating measures (except ordinary glasses/contacts) must be ignored. The determination is based on how the impairment would limit the person without such measures.
“Substantially Limits”	Interpreted as a demanding standard, often meaning “severely restricts.”	Clarified to be a less demanding standard than what the courts had required. The focus is on whether an entity has complied with its obligations.
Episodic Conditions	Coverage was uncertain if the condition was in remission or not currently active.	An impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active.
Major Life Activities	Limited to a list of basic activities like walking, seeing, and working.	Expanded to explicitly include “major bodily functions” (e.g., functions of the immune system, neurological system, cell growth).

Part VI: A Living Structure: The ADA’s Legacy, Impact, and Unfinished Work

More than three decades after its passage, the ADA’s blueprint has profoundly reshaped American society.

Its legacy is a complex story of undeniable progress in some areas and persistent, frustrating challenges in others.

Tangible Successes: Remaking the Physical World

The ADA’s most visible and unqualified success has been the transformation of the nation’s physical landscape.

The law’s clear standards for accessibility have resulted in a built environment that is more inclusive than ever before.⁵

Curb cuts, ramps at building entrances, accessible parking spaces, lifts on public buses, accessible restrooms, Braille signage, and audible crosswalk signals have become commonplace.¹

In communications, the widespread availability of telecommunications relay services and closed captioning on television has broken down long-standing barriers.⁵

This physical integration has had a powerful social effect.

By making it possible for more people with disabilities to participate in community life—to shop, eat out, attend school, and use public services—the ADA has increased their visibility.

This, in turn, has helped to shift public attitudes, fostering greater awareness, respect, and acceptance.²⁵

The Persistent Challenge: Employment

In stark contrast to its success in public accommodations, the ADA’s impact on employment has been far more ambiguous and, to many, deeply disappointing.

Despite the clear prohibitions in Title I, the employment rate for people with disabilities remains stubbornly and significantly lower than for those without disabilities.⁸

Some studies even showed a decline in the employment rate for certain groups of people with disabilities in the years after the ADA’s passage.⁸

The reasons for this persistent gap are complex.

Some researchers suggest that employers, fearing the cost of accommodations or potential lawsuits, may quietly avoid hiring candidates with disabilities.⁸

This occurs despite evidence that the majority of workplace accommodations are low-cost or no-cost.²⁵

The very nature of employment decisions—which are often subjective and multifactorial—makes discrimination harder to prove than an architectural barrier.

The Problem of Enforcement

A core structural weakness of the ADA is that its enforcement is almost entirely complaint-driven.²⁷

There are no “ADA police” proactively inspecting businesses or government agencies for compliance.

This means that a violation can go completely unchecked unless an individual with a disability has the knowledge, time, and resources to file a formal complaint with the EEOC or DOJ, or to undertake a federal lawsuit.

This places the primary burden of enforcement on the very community the law is meant to protect, a significant barrier to achieving the law’s full promise.²⁷

The ADA’s mixed legacy reveals a fundamental asymmetry of change: it is far easier for a law to mandate changes to physical structures than it is to change complex human systems.

The ADA’s blueprint is highly effective for tangible, architectural problems where compliance can be measured with a tape measure.

A ramp either meets the required slope, or it does not.

However, when that same blueprint is applied to intangible social systems like employment—governed by hiring biases, corporate culture, and subjective judgments—its effectiveness diminishes.

Proving that a failure to hire was due to discrimination is infinitely more complex than proving a doorway is too narrow.

The ADA’s great success in rebuilding the physical world thus serves to highlight the profound difficulty of rebuilding the intangible, but equally powerful, systems of social and economic opportunity.

Conclusion: The Unending Work of Building an Inclusive Nation

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 was a watershed moment in the history of civil rights.

It was a revolutionary and essential piece of legislation that codified the principle of inclusion into federal law.

It provided the legal and moral foundation upon which a more accessible and equitable society could be built, fundamentally reframing disability as an issue of civil rights, not charity.

The Act, however, was a foundation, not a finished structure.

Its history demonstrates that civil rights are not self-enforcing.

The passage of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 in response to judicial erosion shows that the ADA is a living document, one that requires constant vigilance and periodic renovation to protect its original intent.

The law’s undeniable success in transforming America’s physical architecture stands in contrast to the persistent struggles for economic and social integration, particularly in employment.

The ADA gave the nation a new blueprint for inclusion.

It tore down countless walls of exclusion and created pathways to opportunity where none existed before.

Yet the work of building a truly inclusive society—one where the principles of the ADA are reflected not just in the design of our buildings, but in the operations of our businesses and the attitudes of all citizens—is an ongoing construction project.

It is a project that requires the sustained commitment, effort, and vigilance of all.

Works cited

1. The Impact of the ADA in American Communities, accessed on August 11, 2025, http://southwestada.org/html/publications/general/20150715%20ADA%20Impact%20Narrative%20(Rev-Final%20v2).pdf
2. Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) | Embryo Project Encyclopedia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/americans-disabilities-act-1990
3. The History of the Americans with Disabilities Act – DREDF, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://dredf.org/the-history-of-the-americans-with-disabilities-act/
4. U.S. Access Board – Americans with Disabilities Act, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.access-board.gov/about/law/ada.html
5. How the Americans With Disabilities Act changed the world | GoHealth Urgent Care, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.gohealthuc.com/library/how-americans-with-disabilities-act-changed-the-world
6. Making Disability Rights History: HHS Announces Powerful Anti-Discrimination Protections, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://acl.gov/news-and-events/acl-blog/making-disability-rights-history-hhs-announces-powerful-anti
7. ADA History – In Their Own Words: Part One | ACL Administration for Community Living, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://acl.gov/ada/origins-of-the-ada
8. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 – Wikipedia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990
9. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://disabilityjustice.org/the-americans-with-disabilities-act-ada-of-1990/
10. The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Brief Overview – Congress.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12227
11. adata.org, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://adata.org/learn-about-ada#:~:text=The%20purpose%20of%20the%20law,origin%2C%20age%2C%20and%20religion.
12. An Overview of the Americans With Disabilities Act – ADA National Network, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://adata.org/factsheet/ADA-overview
13. What is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)?, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://adata.org/learn-about-ada
14. Guide to the Americans With Disabilities Act | UCSF Human Resources, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hr.ucsf.edu/benefits/staff-and-faculty/guide-americans-disabilities-act
15. The ADA: Your Responsibilities as an Employer, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/publications/ada-your-responsibilities-employer
16. Guide to Disability Rights Laws | ADA.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.ada.gov/resources/disability-rights-guide/
17. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 – ADA – Olmstead Rights, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.olmsteadrights.org/about-olmstead/item.6460-The_Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990_ADA
18. What is the definition of disability under the ADA?, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://adata.org/faq/what-definition-disability-under-ada
19. YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILTIES ACT What Is the Americans with Disabilities Act? – HHS.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/civilrights/resources/factsheets/ada.pdf
20. Defining a Disability under the ADA – ADA Guide for Employers and Businesses, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://adagreatlakes.org/BusinessToolkit/?section=1&id=2
21. An Employer View of the Changes from the ADA Amendments Act, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://adata.org/factsheet/employer-view-ada
22. Questions and Answers about the Department of Justice’s … – ADA.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://archive.ada.gov/regs2016/adaaa_qa.html
23. www.congress.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/3406#:~:text=ADA%20Amendments%20Act%20of%202008%20%2D%20(Sec.,as%20having%20such%20an%20impairment.%22
24. www.gohealthuc.com, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.gohealthuc.com/library/how-americans-with-disabilities-act-changed-the-world#:~:text=Since%20the%20ADA%20was%20passed,have%20hearing%20or%20vision%20impairments.
25. The Effects of the ADA – U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/ada/ch2.htm
26. The Americans with Disabilities Act: Understanding its importance and impact – Codemantra, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://codemantra.com/the-americans-with-disabilities-act-understanding-its-importance-and-impact/
27. The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Brief Background, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://disabilityphilanthropy.org/resource/the-americans-with-disabilities-act-a-brief-background/
28. Anti-discrimination law – Wikipedia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-discrimination_law