A Comprehensive Legal and Financial Guide to Designating a Trust as a Beneficiary

Part I: Foundational Principles of Beneficiary Designation

The decision to name a trust as a beneficiary of an asset, such as a life insurance policy or a retirement account, is a sophisticated estate planning strategy that moves beyond simple inheritance.

It involves creating a distinct legal structure to manage and distribute assets according to a detailed set of instructions.

Understanding the fundamental principles that govern trusts and beneficiary designations is the essential first step in determining whether this complex approach aligns with one’s personal and financial objectives.

This initial part of the report will define the key legal roles involved, clarify the critical distinction between a trust receiving an asset and an individual benefiting from a trust, and establish the importance of a multi-layered beneficiary plan.

Section 1.1: The Fiduciary Triangle: Understanding the Grantor, Trustee, and Beneficiary

Every trust is built upon a foundational legal relationship between three distinct parties: the grantor, the trustee, and the beneficiary.

A clear understanding of each role is paramount to comprehending the function and power of a trust.¹

• The Grantor: Also known as the settlor or trustor, the grantor is the individual who creates the trust and transfers assets into it. The grantor establishes the rules of the trust, which are memorialized in a legal document called the trust instrument. These rules dictate how the assets are to be managed and distributed.¹
• The Trustee: The trustee is the individual or institution (such as a bank’s trust department) that holds legal title to the assets within the trust. The trustee is legally obligated to manage and administer these assets strictly according to the terms set forth by the grantor in the trust document.¹ This role carries a significant legal responsibility known as a “fiduciary duty,” which is the highest standard of care in law. This duty requires the trustee to act with undivided loyalty and in the absolute best interests of the beneficiaries, handling everything from investing assets to paying bills and filing taxes on behalf of the trust.⁴
• The Beneficiary: The beneficiary is the person, group of people, or entity (such as a charity) for whom the trust was created. The beneficiary is the party who stands to benefit from the trust’s assets, whether through receiving income generated by the trust, distributions of the assets themselves, or other advantages as stipulated in the trust agreement.⁵

It is important to recognize that these roles are not always filled by three separate people.

A grantor can also serve as the trustee of their own revocable living trust during their lifetime.

Furthermore, it is legally permissible for a trustee to also be a beneficiary of the same trust.⁴

This overlap is particularly common in family trusts, where an adult child might be appointed to manage the trust from which they will also inherit.

While this can be efficient and practical, it is also a primary source of potential conflicts of interest.

The arrangement requires a careful balancing act, as the trustee-beneficiary must make decisions that are fair to all other beneficiaries, not just themselves.

This dual role can invite increased legal scrutiny if disputes arise, making the careful drafting of the trust document and the selection of a trustworthy individual critically important.⁴

Section 1.2: The Core Distinction: A Trust as Beneficiary vs. a Beneficiary of a Trust

While the terms may sound similar, the distinction between a “trust as beneficiary” and a “beneficiary of a trust” is the conceptual cornerstone of this entire estate planning strategy.

The difference lies in the direction of the asset flow and the interposition of a legal framework.

• A Trust as Beneficiary: In this scenario, an external asset—such as a 401(k), an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), or a life insurance policy—names the trust itself as the legal recipient upon the asset owner’s death.⁷ When the owner passes away, the death benefit or account balance is paid directly
  to the trust. At that moment, the trust becomes the legal owner of those funds, and the trustee assumes responsibility for managing them according to the trust’s rules.⁸
• A Beneficiary of a Trust: This refers to an individual or entity named within the trust document who is designated to receive distributions from the assets held by the trust.¹ They are the ultimate intended recipients of the wealth. However, their access to that wealth is not direct; it is mediated by the trustee and governed by the specific instructions laid out in the trust agreement.¹⁰

This separation of legal and equitable ownership is the very mechanism that makes a trust such a powerful tool.

The trustee holds the legal title to the assets, giving them the authority to manage, invest, and protect them.

The beneficiaries hold equitable title, meaning they have the right to enjoy and benefit from the assets as specified in the trust.¹⁰

When an asset owner chooses to name a trust as a beneficiary, they are intentionally creating this legal separation.

They are trading the simplicity of direct inheritance for the sophisticated advantages of control, asset protection, and professional management that this framework provides.

This is not a mere technicality; it is a deliberate strategic choice to interpose a set of rules and a manager between a valuable asset and the person intended to benefit from it.

Section 1.3: Primary, Contingent, and Successor Beneficiaries: Building a Resilient Plan

A comprehensive estate plan anticipates and prepares for unforeseen circumstances.

A key part of this preparation is creating a clear hierarchy of beneficiaries to ensure assets are distributed according to one’s wishes, no matter what happens.

This involves designating primary, contingent, and sometimes successor beneficiaries.

• Primary Beneficiary: This is the individual or entity designated to be first in line to receive the asset upon the owner’s death.¹² If the primary beneficiary is alive and able to inherit, they will receive the asset.
• Contingent Beneficiary: Also known as a secondary or alternate beneficiary, this is the designated backup.¹³ The contingent beneficiary inherits the asset only if the primary beneficiary has passed away before the asset owner, cannot be located, or formally “disclaims” (refuses) the inheritance.¹²
• Successor Beneficiary: This term is most often used within the context of a trust itself. It refers to the individual or entity who will receive a trust beneficiary’s share of the assets if that beneficiary dies after the inheritance has begun but before the trust has fully distributed their portion.⁷ This allows the grantor to control the line of succession for assets held within the trust.

Failing to name a contingent beneficiary is a frequent and critical error in estate planning.

If the primary beneficiary is unable to inherit and no contingent beneficiary is named, an asset that is designed to avoid probate—like an IRA or life insurance policy—will typically default to the deceased’s estate.¹²

This forces the asset into the court-supervised probate process, subjecting it to the very delays, legal costs, and public scrutiny that beneficiary designations are meant to prevent.¹³

A trust can be named as either a primary or a contingent beneficiary.

A particularly powerful and common strategy for married couples is to name the surviving spouse as the primary beneficiary of a retirement account and to name a family trust as the contingent beneficiary.¹⁷

This approach provides a robust fail-safe.

If the spouse survives, they can take advantage of favorable spousal inheritance rules.

If the spouse predeceases the account owner, the assets flow into the trust, preserving the grantor’s detailed instructions for control and protection for other beneficiaries, such as children.

Part II: The Strategic Case for Naming a Trust as Beneficiary

The decision to name a trust as a beneficiary is driven by a desire for outcomes that direct inheritance cannot provide.

While more complex and costly than naming an individual, a trust offers unparalleled advantages in four key areas: control over distributions, protection of assets, sophisticated tax planning, and the avoidance of public court proceedings.

These benefits are most compelling in situations involving minor children, beneficiaries who may be irresponsible with money or have special needs, blended families, high-net-worth estates, and a general desire for privacy and long-term asset management.

Section 2.1: Ultimate Control: Managing Distributions

The foremost reason to name a trust as a beneficiary is to exert precise and enduring control over how, when, and for what purpose assets are distributed after one’s death.²²

When an individual inherits an asset directly, they receive it as a lump sum or have complete control over the withdrawal schedule.

A trust replaces this with a rulebook crafted by the grantor and enforced by the trustee.

This is particularly vital in several common family situations:

• Minor Children: Insurance companies and financial institutions will not pay large sums of money directly to a minor. If a minor is named as a direct beneficiary, a court must appoint a legal guardian to manage the funds—a process that is costly, time-consuming, and may result in a guardian the parent would not have chosen.¹⁸ The funds are then typically turned over to the child in a lump sum when they reach the age of majority (usually 18 or 21).²⁵ Many grantors feel this is too young for an individual to responsibly handle a significant inheritance. By naming a trust, the grantor can appoint a chosen trustee and specify that funds be used for the child’s health, education, and support, with distributions of principal delayed until later ages, such as one-third at age 25, one-third at 30, and the remainder at 35.¹⁵
• Spendthrift Beneficiaries: For beneficiaries who have demonstrated a lack of financial discipline, a direct inheritance can be squandered quickly. A “spendthrift trust” is specifically designed to protect a beneficiary from their own imprudence.¹⁷ The trustee manages the assets and can make distributions directly to pay for the beneficiary’s needs (e.g., rent, medical bills) or provide a regular allowance, preventing the beneficiary from depleting the entire inheritance at once.²⁶
• Beneficiaries with Special Needs: This is one of the most critical applications for a trust. Many essential government assistance programs, such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid, are means-tested. A direct inheritance of even a modest amount can increase a disabled individual’s assets above the program’s strict limits, causing a loss of eligibility for vital medical care and financial support.⁷ A properly drafted Special Needs Trust can hold the inherited assets for the beneficiary’s benefit. The trustee can use the funds to pay for supplemental needs not covered by government programs—such as specialized equipment, therapy, or recreation—without having the assets count against the beneficiary for eligibility purposes.²⁵
• Blended Families and Second Marriages: In a second marriage, an individual may wish to provide for their current spouse for the remainder of their life, while ensuring that any remaining assets ultimately pass to children from a prior marriage. If assets are left directly to the surviving spouse, that spouse has complete control and can leave the assets to their own children or a new spouse. By leaving assets to a trust (such as a Qualified Terminable Interest Property, or QTIP, trust), the grantor can direct the trustee to provide income and support to the surviving spouse for their lifetime. The trust document then dictates that upon the surviving spouse’s death, the remaining trust principal is distributed to the grantor’s children from the first marriage, guaranteeing the grantor’s wishes are fulfilled.⁷

Section 2.2: The Fortress of a Trust: Asset Protection

Beyond controlling a beneficiary’s access to funds, a trust can serve as a legal fortress, shielding the inheritance from external threats.

This protection is a significant advantage over direct inheritance.

• Creditor Protection: A landmark Supreme Court case, Clark v. Rameker, established that an inherited IRA is not a “retirement fund” in the hands of a beneficiary and is therefore not protected from the beneficiary’s creditors in bankruptcy.¹⁷ If an individual with significant debts inherits an IRA directly, those funds can be seized to satisfy judgments. However, when the IRA is left to a properly structured trust with “spendthrift” provisions, the assets held within the trust are generally protected from the beneficiaries’ creditors, divorce settlements, and other legal claims.³² The creditor cannot force the trustee to make a distribution to the beneficiary.³¹ This protection is strongest when the trust is an “accumulation” trust (discussed in Part IV) and the trustee is an independent third party.
• Preserving Property Character: In many jurisdictions, an inheritance is considered the “sole and separate property” of the person who receives it. However, if the beneficiary commingles those funds with marital assets—for example, by depositing them into a joint bank account—the inheritance can become marital property subject to division in a divorce. By keeping the assets within a trust, the trustee can ensure they remain separate property, preserving them for the beneficiary as the grantor intended.¹⁷

Section 2.3: Advanced Estate Tax and Succession Planning

For individuals with substantial wealth, trusts are indispensable tools for minimizing taxes and directing the flow of assets across multiple generations.

• Minimizing Estate Taxes: The federal government and some states impose an estate tax on the value of assets transferred at death above a certain exemption amount. For estates that exceed this threshold, the tax can be substantial. Certain types of irrevocable trusts can be used to move assets out of the grantor’s taxable estate. The most common example is the Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT), which is created to own a life insurance policy. By having the trust own the policy, the death benefit is paid to the trust and is not included in the grantor’s estate for tax purposes, potentially saving millions in taxes.³ Other sophisticated trusts, like Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), are also used to transfer wealth while minimizing gift and estate taxes.⁷
• Controlling Succession: When an individual inherits an asset, they gain the power to name their own beneficiaries for whatever remains upon their death. This means the original owner loses all control over the asset’s ultimate destination. A trust allows the grantor to pre-determine the line of succession. The trust document can specify that after the primary beneficiary’s death, their share will pass to their children, or to another named individual, or to a charity. This provides certainty and allows for multi-generational planning that is impossible with direct bequests.⁷

Section 2.4: Avoiding Probate and Ensuring Privacy

One of the most widely recognized benefits of using beneficiary designations is the ability to bypass the judicial process of probate.

Assets that have a designated beneficiary, such as life insurance, annuities, and retirement accounts, pass directly to that beneficiary by operation of contract or law.¹³

They are not controlled by the instructions in a will and do not have to go through probate court.

Naming a trust as the beneficiary preserves this significant advantage.¹²

Avoiding probate is desirable for several reasons:

• Time: Probate can be a lengthy process, often taking months or even years to complete, during which time heirs may not have access to needed funds.¹³
• Cost: The process involves court fees, executor fees, and attorney’s fees, which can reduce the net amount passed to beneficiaries.¹⁵
• Privacy: Probate is a public process. The will and a list of the estate’s assets become part of the public record, accessible to anyone. A trust is a private document, and its administration is not open to public inspection, preserving the family’s financial privacy.²³

It is crucial to understand a common point of confusion regarding “pour-over” wills and probate.

A pour-over will is designed to work in conjunction with a living trust, acting as a safety net to transfer any forgotten or omitted assets into the trust after death.²⁹

However, any assets that pass

through the will must first go through probate before they can be “poured over” into the trust.²⁹

The most effective probate-avoidance strategy, therefore, involves meticulously titling major assets in the name of the trust or naming the trust as the direct beneficiary during one’s lifetime, minimizing the assets that must rely on the will for transfer.

To synthesize these strategic considerations, the following table provides a direct comparison of the two primary approaches.

Table 1: Direct Individual vs. Trust Beneficiary Analysis

Feature	Direct Individual Beneficiary	Trust as Beneficiary
Control Over Distributions	Low (Beneficiary has full, immediate control over inherited assets)	High (Trustee manages and distributes assets according to the grantor’s specific, long-term instructions)
Asset Protection	Low to None (Inherited assets are vulnerable to the beneficiary’s creditors, lawsuits, and divorce proceedings)	High (A properly structured trust can shield assets from the beneficiary’s creditors and preserve them as separate property)
Simplicity & Speed	High (Beneficiary typically only needs to provide a death certificate to claim the asset, with quick access to funds)	Low (Trust administration is required, involving the trustee, legal review, and a more delayed distribution process)
Cost & Complexity	Low (No setup or ongoing administrative costs)	High (Requires legal fees to draft the trust and may have ongoing trustee and tax preparation fees)
Spousal IRA Rollover	Available (A surviving spouse can roll over an inherited IRA into their own, a significant tax advantage)	Generally Unavailable (This powerful option is lost if the trust is the primary beneficiary, even if the spouse is the trust’s sole beneficiary)
Tax Management	Simpler (Distributions are taxed at the beneficiary’s individual rate)	More Complex (Can involve highly compressed trust tax brackets, complex RMD calculations, and requires careful drafting)

Part III: The Procedural Guide to Naming a Trust

Once the strategic decision to use a trust has been made, the focus shifts to the practical mechanics of implementation.

This involves creating a legally sound trust, using precise language to designate it as a beneficiary, and following the specific procedures required by different financial institutions for various asset types.

Executing these steps correctly is as crucial as the initial strategy; a simple error in paperwork can undermine the entire plan.

Section 3.1: The Essential First Step: Creating and Funding a Valid Trust

Before a trust can be named as a beneficiary, it must legally exist.

This involves several foundational actions:

1. Drafting the Trust Instrument: An attorney must draft a trust document that reflects the grantor’s wishes. This document names the trustee(s) and beneficiaries and lays out the detailed rules for managing and distributing assets.
2. Ensuring Validity: The trust must be created in accordance with the laws of the applicable state to be considered valid.²² This typically involves the grantor signing the document before a notary public and, in some cases, witnesses.³⁷
3. Funding the Trust: A trust that holds no assets is merely a “useless piece of paper”.³⁸ For a living trust to be effective during the grantor’s lifetime, assets must be retitled into the name of the trust. For assets that will pass to the trust via beneficiary designation at death (like an IRA or life insurance), the “funding” occurs automatically upon the grantor’s death. The critical step is ensuring the beneficiary designation forms are correctly completed and filed.

A key consideration during creation is whether the trust will be revocable or irrevocable.

A revocable trust, often called a living trust, can be changed or dissolved by the grantor at any time.¹

An irrevocable trust generally cannot be altered once created, which is why it offers superior asset protection and estate tax benefits.¹

For the specific purpose of inheriting retirement accounts, a revocable trust is acceptable, but it must contain language stipulating that it becomes irrevocable upon the grantor’s death to qualify for “see-through” tax treatment.²²

Section 3.2: Precise Legal Language: How to Title a Trust as a Beneficiary

When completing a beneficiary designation form, vague or incomplete information can cause significant problems.

Simply writing “My Family Trust” is insufficient and will likely be rejected or lead to legal complications.⁴¹

The financial institution or insurance company holding the asset requires unambiguous instructions to release funds to the correct legal entity (the trust) and its designated manager (the trustee).

This precision provides legal certainty and protects the institution from liability, ensuring a smooth transfer.

The standard, legally sufficient format for naming a trust as a beneficiary must include three key pieces of information ⁴²:

1. The full legal name of the current trustee(s).
2. The full legal name of the trust.
3. The date the trust was created (executed).

Here are several examples of proper wording for different scenarios ²⁹:

• For an Individual Trustee:
  Jane Doe, trustee, or her successor in trust, under the John Doe Revocable Living Trust, dated January 1, 20xx.
• For Multiple Trustees:
  Jane Doe and James Doe, trustees, or their successors in trust, under the John Doe Family Trust, dated July 8, 2009.
• For a Corporate Trustee:
  ABC Trust Company, Inc., trustee, or its successor in trust, under the John Doe Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, dated July 8, 2009.
• As a Contingent Beneficiary:
  Jane Doe, wife, if living; otherwise to ABC Trust Company, Inc., trustee, or its successor in trust, under the John Doe Revocable Living Trust, dated July 8, 2009.

Including the phrase “or her/his/its successor in trust” is a critical best practice.

It provides for a seamless transition of authority if the named trustee is unable or unwilling to serve, without requiring an update to the beneficiary form itself.

Section 3.3: Step-by-Step Designation for Life Insurance Policies

The process of naming a trust as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy is mechanically straightforward once the trust has been established.²¹

• Step 1: Obtain the Beneficiary Designation Form. Contact the life insurance provider to request their specific form. This can usually be done through an online portal, over the phone, or by requesting a physical form by mail.⁴⁴
• Step 2: Complete the Form with Precision. Fill out the form using the exact legal language detailed in Section 3.2. Be prepared to provide the trust’s Tax Identification Number (TIN) if it has one.⁴³
• Step 3: Submit the Form and Retain Records. Submit the completed form to the insurance company according to their instructions. It is crucial to keep a copy of the submitted form with other important estate planning documents.⁴⁶
• Step 4: Post-Death Administration. After the insured’s death, the named trustee is responsible for claiming the death benefit. The trustee will need to contact the insurance company and provide a certified copy of the death certificate along with the insurer’s required claim forms.⁹ The process for a trust to receive payment can take slightly longer—typically a few weeks to a month—than for an individual beneficiary, who might receive a check within a week.³

Section 3.4: Step-by-Step Designation for Retirement Accounts (IRAs, 401(k)s)

The physical act of naming a trust as a beneficiary for a retirement account mirrors the process for life insurance.

The account owner obtains the beneficiary designation form from the IRA custodian or 401(k) plan administrator, completes it with the precise legal language, and submits it.⁴⁷

However, the simplicity of this action belies the immense legal and tax complexity involved, which is the subject of Part IV of this report.

This step should only be taken after a thorough analysis of the significant consequences, particularly those related to the SECURE Act, Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs), and the stringent criteria for “see-through” trusts.

A critical post-death step is unique to retirement accounts.

For a trust to qualify for favorable “see-through” status, the trustee must provide the IRA custodian or plan administrator with specific documentation.

This can be either a copy of the full trust instrument or a certified list of all trust beneficiaries.¹⁷

This documentation must be provided by a strict deadline:

October 31 of the year following the year of the account owner’s death.³⁴

Recent regulations may have eliminated this documentation requirement for IRAs (but not for employer-sponsored plans like 401(k)s), but this is a nuanced point that requires verification with a qualified legal advisor.²²

Section 3.5: Integrating Trust Beneficiaries with Your Last Will and Testament

A comprehensive estate plan requires the seamless coordination of assets that pass via a will and those that pass via beneficiary designation.

A failure to understand how these two mechanisms interact is a common source of error.

• Beneficiary Designations Supersede the Will: This is one of the most fundamental and unyielding rules of estate planning. The beneficiary named on an IRA, 401(k), life insurance policy, or annuity form will receive that asset, regardless of any conflicting instructions in a will or trust document.⁷ If a will states “all my assets go to my son,” but an old IRA beneficiary form names an ex-spouse, the ex-spouse will receive the IRA.³⁶ This underscores the importance of regularly reviewing and updating all beneficiary forms to ensure they align with one’s current wishes.
• The “Pour-Over” Will: This type of will is specifically designed to work with a living trust. It typically contains a clause that names the grantor’s living trust as the beneficiary of their entire residuary estate (all assets not passed by other means). The will’s function is to act as a safety net, “catching” any assets that the grantor neglected to title in the trust’s name during their lifetime and “pouring them over” into the trust after death.²⁹
• The Probate Caveat: As previously noted, this “pour-over” mechanism comes with a significant caveat: any assets that pass through the will are subject to probate.²⁹ The assets must go through the public, costly, and time-consuming court process before they can be transferred to the trust. Therefore, a well-executed estate plan seeks to minimize the assets that must rely on the pour-over will. The primary strategy is to fund the trust during one’s lifetime by retitling assets and by correctly naming the trust as the beneficiary on all applicable accounts.

Part IV: Navigating the Labyrinth of Retirement Accounts

Designating a trust as the beneficiary of a retirement account, such as a traditional IRA, Roth IRA, or 401(k), is arguably the most complex area of modern estate planning.

While the potential benefits of control and asset protection are significant, the landscape is fraught with intricate tax rules, strict deadlines, and potential pitfalls that can lead to disastrous financial consequences if not navigated with expert precision.

The passage of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act in 2019 fundamentally altered the strategies for inheriting these accounts, making a deep understanding of the new rules essential.

Section 4.1: The SECURE Act Revolution: The 10-Year Rule

Effective for deaths occurring after December 31, 2019, the SECURE Act dramatically changed the rules for most non-spouse beneficiaries inheriting retirement accounts.⁷

The law eliminated the popular “stretch IRA” strategy for this group.

Previously, a young beneficiary could “stretch” distributions from an inherited IRA over their entire life expectancy, maximizing tax-deferred growth for decades.¹⁵

The SECURE Act replaced this with a rigid 10-year rule.

This rule mandates that most non-spouse beneficiaries must withdraw the entire balance of the inherited retirement account by December 31 of the 10th year following the year of the original account owner’s death.⁷

This requirement applies equally whether the beneficiary is an individual or a qualifying see-through trust.

The accelerated distribution schedule forces a much faster recognition of taxable income, potentially pushing beneficiaries into higher tax brackets and significantly reducing the long-term value of the inheritance.

Section 4.2: Critical Exceptions: Identifying and Planning for Eligible Designated Beneficiaries (EDBs)

The harshness of the 10-year rule is mitigated by a crucial set of exceptions for a special class of individuals known as Eligible Designated Beneficiaries (EDBs).

If a beneficiary falls into one of these categories, they are exempt from the 10-year rule and may still utilize a life-expectancy “stretch” payout, preserving the powerful tax-deferral benefits of the old system.¹⁵

The five categories of EDBs are ⁷:

1. The Surviving Spouse: Spouses have the most flexibility, including the ability to perform a spousal rollover (discussed in Section 4.5).
2. Minor Children of the Account Owner: A child of the original account owner can take distributions based on their life expectancy until they reach the age of majority (defined as 21 for this purpose). Once they turn 21, the 10-year clock begins, and the remaining account balance must be fully distributed by the time they turn 31.³⁴ This exception does not apply to grandchildren.
3. Disabled Individuals: Beneficiaries who are disabled according to the strict IRS definition can stretch distributions over their lifetime.
4. Chronically Ill Individuals: Beneficiaries who are certified as chronically ill can also use a lifetime stretch.
5. Individuals Not More Than 10 Years Younger Than the Decedent: This often includes siblings or unmarried partners who are close in age to the account owner.

The presence of EDBs makes the decision to use a trust intensely fact-specific.

If a see-through trust is established solely for the benefit of an EDB (e.g., a disabled child), the trust can take distributions over that beneficiary’s life expectancy.

However, if a trust has multiple beneficiaries, including a mix of EDBs and non-EDBs, the rules become exceedingly complex.

Often, the distribution schedule is dictated by the beneficiary with the shortest life expectancy or the least favorable status, which can negate the benefits of having an EDB in the group.¹⁵

This places an enormous premium on meticulous trust drafting by a qualified attorney who can potentially create separate sub-trusts to optimize the outcome for each beneficiary.²²

Section 4.3: The “See-Through” Trust: A Gateway to Favorable Tax Treatment

A trust, as a legal entity, is not a person and has no life expectancy.

Therefore, under default IRS rules, a trust named as an IRA beneficiary would be subject to highly unfavorable distribution rules, such as a 5-year payout if the owner died before their Required Beginning Date (RBD) for taking RMDs.⁷

This would accelerate taxes and destroy the potential for tax-deferred growth.

To avoid this outcome, the trust must qualify as a “see-through” trust (also called a “look-through” trust).

This is a critical IRS exception that permits the retirement plan administrator to effectively ignore the trust as an entity and “look through” to its underlying individual beneficiaries to determine the applicable distribution schedule.⁸

To qualify, the trust must meet four strict requirements ¹⁷:

1. The trust must be valid under the laws of the state in which it is established.
2. The trust must be irrevocable, or contain terms specifying that it becomes irrevocable upon the death of the account owner.
3. The beneficiaries of the trust must be identifiable individuals. Naming a non-individual, such as a charity or the owner’s estate, as a primary or even secondary beneficiary can disqualify the trust from see-through status for all beneficiaries, forcing a rapid payout.¹⁷ Recent 2024 Treasury Regulations have provided some relief, clarifying that more remote, contingent beneficiaries (like a charity named after all individual beneficiaries have passed) may not disqualify the trust, but this is a complex area requiring expert legal analysis.⁷
4. Proper documentation (either a copy of the trust or a certified list of beneficiaries) must be provided to the IRA custodian by the deadline of October 31 of the year following the account owner’s death.

Failure to meet even one of these requirements can cause the trust to be treated as a non-designated beneficiary, resulting in a rapid and tax-inefficient liquidation of the retirement account.

Section 4.4: Conduit vs. Accumulation Trusts: A Deep-Dive Analysis

Within the category of see-through trusts, there are two primary structures: conduit trusts and accumulation trusts.

The choice between them represents the most significant strategic decision in modern IRA trust planning, as it creates a direct trade-off between tax simplicity and asset protection.

• Conduit Trust:

• Function: This trust acts as a simple pipeline or “conduit.” The trust document requires that any distribution the trustee withdraws from the inherited IRA must be immediately passed out to the trust beneficiary.³¹ The trustee has no discretion to hold the funds.
• Taxation: Because the funds pass directly through, the trust itself pays no tax. The beneficiary receives the distribution and pays income tax at their own individual tax rate.³³
• Asset Protection: This is the major weakness. While the principal is protected as long as it remains in the inherited IRA, the required distributions are not. Once a distribution is paid out to the beneficiary, it is fully exposed to their creditors, potential lawsuits, or a divorce settlement.³¹ Under the 10-year rule, the entire account balance must eventually be paid out and exposed.
• Accumulation Trust:

• Function: This trust provides the trustee with maximum flexibility and control. The trustee withdraws funds from the IRA but has the discretion to either distribute them to the beneficiary or retain and accumulate them within the trust for future use.³¹
• Asset Protection: This is the primary strength. Because the trustee can hold the funds, the after-tax proceeds of the IRA distributions can remain shielded within the trust, protected from the beneficiary’s creditors and their own financial mismanagement.³¹
• Taxation: This is the significant drawback. If the trustee chooses to accumulate the IRA distribution inside the trust rather than paying it out, the trust itself is responsible for the income tax. Trusts are subject to highly compressed tax brackets. For example, in 2024, a trust hits the top 37% federal income tax rate on income over just $15,200, whereas a single individual does not reach that bracket until their income exceeds several hundred thousand dollars.⁸ This can result in a substantial tax penalty for the benefit of asset protection.

The SECURE Act’s 10-year rule has fundamentally shifted the strategic analysis between these two trust types.

Before the Act, conduit trusts were often preferred to maximize the decades-long tax deferral of the stretch IRA.

Now that the stretch is gone for most, the calculus has changed.

The superior, long-term asset protection offered by an accumulation trust has become relatively more valuable.

An accumulation trust allows the trustee to strategically withdraw funds from the IRA over the 10-year period to manage the tax impact, while still protecting the after-tax proceeds within the trust’s fortress.

A conduit trust, by contrast, may be forced to distribute the entire account balance in year 10, potentially pushing a beneficiary into the highest tax bracket and negating its primary tax advantage.⁵³

The decision is no longer a simple choice for tax deferral but a nuanced trade-off between robust protection and potential tax inefficiency.

Table 2: Conduit vs. Accumulation Trust Comparison (Post-SECURE Act)

Feature	Conduit Trust	Accumulation Trust
Trustee Discretion	None. Must immediately pass all IRA distributions to the beneficiary.	High. Can choose to distribute funds or retain (accumulate) them in the trust.
Asset Protection	Low. Protects IRA principal only until distributed; offers no protection for distributions once paid out.	High. Can protect both the IRA principal and the after-tax distributions retained within the trust.
Income Tax Liability	Paid by the beneficiary at their individual income tax rate.	Paid by the trust at highly compressed rates if funds are retained; paid by the beneficiary if distributed.
Control Over Spending	Low. Beneficiary has full control of funds once distributed.	High. Trustee controls access to funds according to trust terms, ideal for spendthrifts.
Primary Goal Served	Tax Simplicity. Avoids trust tax rates by passing the liability to the beneficiary.	Asset Protection & Control. Prioritizes shielding assets and managing beneficiary access, even at a potential tax cost.
Key Risk	A large, mandatory distribution in year 10 could create a massive tax bill for the beneficiary.	Retaining funds in the trust can trigger extremely high tax rates on relatively small amounts of income.

Section 4.5: The Spousal Rollover: A Key Advantage Lost When Naming a Trust

For married individuals, there is one overriding consideration that often makes naming a trust as a primary beneficiary inadvisable.

A surviving spouse who is named as the direct beneficiary of a retirement account has a unique and exceptionally powerful option: the spousal rollover.¹⁷

This allows the surviving spouse to treat the inherited IRA as their own.

They can roll the assets into their own new or existing IRA, which resets the clock for RMDs.

They will not be required to take any distributions until they reach their own RBD, allowing the funds to continue growing tax-deferred for potentially many more years.¹⁵

This spousal rollover option is generally lost if a trust is named as the primary beneficiary of the retirement account.

This holds true even if the surviving spouse is the sole beneficiary of the trust and has complete control over it.⁸

While the IRS has, in rare cases, issued Private Letter Rulings (PLRs) allowing a rollover from a trust, these are costly to obtain, cannot be relied upon as general precedent, and are granted only under very specific circumstances.⁸

For this reason, the overwhelming consensus among estate planning professionals is that for most married couples, the most effective strategy is to name the spouse as the direct primary beneficiary of all retirement accounts and to name a well-drafted trust as the contingent beneficiary.¹⁷

This secures the powerful spousal rollover if the spouse survives, while providing the control and protection of the trust as a backup plan if the spouse does not.

Part V: Trusts as Beneficiaries for Life Insurance and Other Assets

While the rules for retirement accounts are complex, the analysis for naming a trust as a beneficiary for other assets, such as life insurance policies, is often more straightforward.

The absence of the unique tax-deferral and distribution rules that govern IRAs makes the decision less fraught with tax peril and more focused on the core benefits of trust planning: control and protection.

Section 5.1: Life Insurance: A More Straightforward Case for Trusts

Naming a trust as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy is a common and effective estate planning technique.

The key difference from retirement accounts is that life insurance death benefits are generally received by the beneficiary completely free of income tax.¹⁴

This single fact eliminates the primary disadvantages associated with naming a trust for an IRA.

There are no RMDs to calculate, no 10-year rule to contend with, and no risk of triggering high, compressed trust income tax brackets on the proceeds.³²

Therefore, the decision to use a trust for life insurance can be based almost entirely on its non-tax benefits:

• Control and Management: As with other assets, the trust provides a mechanism to manage the proceeds for beneficiaries who are minors, have special needs, or may be irresponsible with a large, lump-sum payout.²¹
• Asset Protection: The death benefit, when paid to a properly structured trust, can be shielded from the beneficiaries’ creditors, lawsuits, and potential divorce proceedings.³²
• Sophisticated Distribution: A trust allows the grantor to design a detailed distribution plan, providing for multiple beneficiaries over time and planning for various contingencies, which is far more flexible than the limited options on a standard insurance company beneficiary form.³²

Section 5.2: The Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT): A Powerful Estate Tax Tool

For individuals with a high net worth whose estates are likely to be subject to federal or state estate taxes, a specific type of trust—the Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT)—is a cornerstone of advanced planning.²

The primary purpose of an ILIT is to remove the value of the life insurance policy and its death benefit from the insured’s taxable estate.³

For this to work, the ILIT must be both the

owner and the beneficiary of the life insurance policy.⁹

• Mechanics of an ILIT: The grantor creates the irrevocable trust and appoints a trustee. The trust then applies for and purchases a new life insurance policy on the grantor’s life. The grantor makes annual cash gifts to the trust, and the trustee uses these funds to pay the policy premiums.⁹ When the grantor dies, the death benefit is paid to the ILIT, and the trustee distributes the proceeds to the trust beneficiaries according to the grantor’s instructions, all outside of the taxable estate.
• The Three-Year Lookback Rule: If an individual transfers an existing life insurance policy into an ILIT, they must survive for at least three years after the date of the transfer. If they die within this three-year period, the IRS will “look back” and include the death benefit in their taxable estate, defeating the purpose of the trust.⁹ This is why it is often preferable to have the trust purchase a new policy from the outset.

Section 5.3: Annuities and Trusts: A Problematic Pairing

Annuities, particularly non-qualified annuities (those held outside of a retirement account), present a unique and often problematic scenario when a trust is named as the beneficiary.

While the post-death distribution rules for annuities under the tax code are very similar to those for IRAs, they are missing one crucial element: there are no “see-through” trust provisions for inherited annuities.⁵⁵

This omission has profound consequences.

When a trust is named as the beneficiary of an annuity, it is automatically treated as a non-individual beneficiary.

This forces the trust to liquidate the entire annuity contract under the much less favorable 5-year rule.⁵⁵

This means the full taxable gain within the annuity must be recognized over a very short period, which can trigger a significant and accelerated tax liability for the trust (and its beneficiaries).

This makes naming a trust as an annuity beneficiary a generally poor strategy from a tax perspective.

The non-tax benefits of control and protection must be weighed against a guaranteed adverse tax outcome.

This stands in stark contrast to IRAs, where see-through rules offer a potential path to better tax treatment, and to life insurance, where there is generally no income tax on the death benefit.

In some cases, an annuity’s own “restricted payout” options on its beneficiary form may offer a better alternative for controlling distributions without the negative tax impact of a trust.⁵⁵

Section 5.4: Bank and Brokerage Accounts (TOD/POD Designations)

Many standard financial accounts, such as bank checking and savings accounts and taxable brokerage accounts, offer a simple mechanism for avoiding probate called a Payable on Death (POD) or Transfer on Death (TOD) designation.¹⁴

These function exactly like a beneficiary designation on a life insurance policy.

The account owner fills out a form with the financial institution, naming a person or a trust to receive the account upon their death.

This process allows the account to pass directly to the named beneficiary outside of the will and the probate process.

Naming a trust as a TOD or POD beneficiary is a straightforward way to consolidate assets into the trust at death, allowing the trustee to manage them according to the grantor’s comprehensive plan.

Part VI: Risks, Costs, and Common Errors to Avoid

While designating a trust as a beneficiary offers powerful advantages, the strategy is not without significant risks, costs, and complexities.

A failure to appreciate these downsides can lead to unintended consequences, including excessive taxation, administrative delays, family disputes, and the complete frustration of the grantor’s original intent.

Meticulous planning and professional guidance are essential to mitigate these potential problems.

Section 6.1: The Financial Burden: Understanding the Costs of Trust Creation and Administration

Implementing a trust-based estate plan is an investment that comes with both upfront and ongoing costs.

• Creation Costs: Unlike naming an individual beneficiary, which is free, creating a trust requires hiring an experienced estate planning attorney to draft the legal documents. The legal fees for this service can be substantial, reflecting the complexity of the trust’s provisions and the expertise required to ensure it complies with state and federal law.²¹
• Administrative Costs: After the grantor’s death, the trust must be administered. If a professional or corporate trustee is appointed, they will charge an annual fee for their services, typically calculated as a percentage of the assets under management. Even if a family member serves as trustee, there will be costs for accounting services, tax preparation, and potentially legal advice.¹⁹ For smaller estates or IRAs, these ongoing costs can significantly diminish the net inheritance available to beneficiaries.⁴⁷

Section 6.2: The Tax Trap: Compressed Trust Income Tax Brackets

As detailed in Part IV, the most significant financial risk of naming a trust as a beneficiary for a tax-deferred asset like a traditional IRA arises from the tax code’s treatment of trusts.

If an accumulation trust retains taxable income instead of distributing it to the beneficiaries, that income is taxed at brutally compressed rates.⁸

To illustrate the severity of this issue, consider the 2024 federal income tax brackets.

A trust reaches the highest marginal tax rate of 37% once its undistributed income exceeds just $15,200.⁸

In stark contrast, a single individual filer does not hit the 37% bracket until their income surpasses $609,350, and a married couple filing jointly does not reach it until their income is over $731,200.⁵³

This disparity means that an accumulation trust retaining a relatively modest IRA distribution could pay tens of thousands of dollars more in taxes than an individual beneficiary would have paid on the same amount.

This tax inefficiency is a direct trade-off for the superior asset protection and control that an accumulation trust provides.

Section 6.3: Common but Costly Mistakes: An Analysis of Frequent Errors

The path to a successful trust designation is littered with potential missteps.

The following are some of the most common and damaging errors observed by legal and financial professionals:

• Failing to Name or Update Beneficiaries: The most basic error is not naming any beneficiary, which forces an asset into probate.¹² Equally damaging is failing to review and update designations after major life events such as a marriage, divorce, birth of a child, or death of a beneficiary. An outdated form can result in an inheritance unintentionally going to an ex-spouse or the estate of a deceased relative, directly contrary to the grantor’s wishes.³⁸
• Using Vague or Improper Language: Beneficiary forms must be completed with legal precision. Designations like “my children” or “my trust” are ambiguous and invalid. The full legal names of beneficiaries (or the trust) and the percentage shares must be clearly specified.¹⁶
• Creating an “Unfunded” Trust: A trust document, by itself, is legally inert. For a living trust, assets must be retitled into the trust’s name to avoid probate. For assets passing at death, the beneficiary forms must be correctly filed with the financial institutions.³⁸
• Ignoring Spousal Rights: Federal law (ERISA) grants a spouse rights to a 401(k) plan, requiring their written consent to name anyone else as the primary beneficiary.⁶⁰ Many states have similar community property laws that give spouses rights to other assets, including life insurance. Ignoring these rights can invalidate a beneficiary designation.⁴⁵
• Confusing the Will and Beneficiary Designations: A persistent and dangerous misconception is that a will can override a beneficiary designation. The opposite is true: the beneficiary form is a binding contract that supersedes the will for that specific asset.¹⁶ A comprehensive plan requires that both documents be coordinated and aligned.

Section 6.4: The Human Factor: Selecting a Trustee and Mitigating Conflicts of Interest

The success of a trust hinges on the performance of its trustee.

The selection of the trustee is therefore one of the most critical decisions a grantor will make.³⁸

An ideal trustee is trustworthy, financially astute, organized, impartial, and has the time and temperament to handle what can be a demanding role.³⁸

Naming a family member who is also a beneficiary as the trustee is a common choice that presents a classic dilemma:

• Pros: The individual is familiar with the family’s assets and dynamics, may be more motivated to act efficiently, and the arrangement avoids the fees of a professional trustee.⁴
• Cons: The potential for a conflict of interest is the primary downside. The trustee-beneficiary may find it difficult to make objective decisions, favoring their own interests over those of other beneficiaries. This can lead to family disputes and increased legal scrutiny.⁴

To mitigate these risks, several alternatives exist.

The grantor can appoint co-trustees, pairing a family member with an independent professional, to provide oversight and balance decision-making.

Alternatively, a corporate trustee (a bank or trust company) can be appointed to ensure impartial and professional management, though this comes at a higher cost.

The trust document itself can also include specific clauses that provide clear guidelines for the trustee and a mechanism for resolving conflicts, safeguarding the interests of all parties.⁴

Part VII: Synthesis and Strategic Recommendations

The decision to name a trust as a beneficiary is a complex equation involving trade-offs between control, protection, simplicity, and cost.

There is no single “best” answer; the optimal strategy depends entirely on the asset owner’s specific goals, the nature of the assets, and the unique circumstances of their intended beneficiaries.

This final section provides a decision-making framework to synthesize the preceding analysis and underscores the indispensable role of professional guidance in executing a sound estate plan.

Section 7.1: A Decision-Making Framework: When to Name an Individual vs. a Trust

The core of the decision-making process is to first identify the primary objective for each major asset.

Is the highest priority simplicity and tax efficiency for a responsible adult beneficiary? Or is it absolute control and ironclad asset protection for a minor or a spendthrift heir? Once the primary goal is established, a logical strategy emerges.

The following matrix provides at-a-glance recommendations based on this framework.

Table 3: Asset-Specific Beneficiary Strategy Matrix

Primary Goal	Traditional IRA / 401(k)	Roth IRA	Life Insurance	Taxable Brokerage Account
Maximum Simplicity & Low Cost (for responsible adult beneficiaries)	Name individuals directly. Name a contingent beneficiary.	Name individuals directly. Name a contingent beneficiary.	Name individuals directly. Name a contingent beneficiary.	Name individuals directly via TOD designation.
Maximum Tax Deferral for Spouse	Name spouse as primary beneficiary; trust as contingent. This secures the spousal rollover.	Name spouse as primary beneficiary; trust as contingent. This secures the spousal rollover.	Name spouse as primary beneficiary. (Death benefit is already income tax-free).	Name spouse directly via TOD designation. (Receives a full step-up in cost basis).
Control for Minor/Spendthrift	Name an Accumulation Trust as beneficiary. This provides maximum control and protection despite the potential for high trust tax rates.	Name an Accumulation Trust as beneficiary. Tax-free growth is preserved, and distributions from the trust are tax-free to the beneficiary, avoiding the compressed tax bracket issue.	Name a trust as beneficiary. This provides control without the tax complications of a traditional IRA.	Name a trust as beneficiary via TOD designation. The trustee manages the assets.
Maximum Asset Protection (from creditors, lawsuits, divorce)	Name an Accumulation Trust as beneficiary. This is the strongest option for protecting both principal and distributions.	Name an Accumulation Trust as beneficiary. This protects assets from creditors while allowing tax-free distributions.	Name a trust as beneficiary. An Irrevocable Trust offers the highest level of protection.	Transfer ownership to an Irrevocable Trust during lifetime or name a trust as TOD beneficiary.
Estate Tax Minimization (for high-net-worth individuals)	Name a charity as beneficiary to avoid both income and estate tax. Leave other assets to heirs.	Leave to heirs, as distributions are tax-free. Use other assets for charitable giving.	Use an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) to remove the death benefit from the taxable estate.	Use sophisticated trusts (e.g., GRAT) or gifting strategies to transfer assets out of the estate.

Section 7.2: The Non-Negotiable Role of Professional Advisors

This report is intended as a comprehensive educational guide to illuminate the complex issues involved in naming a trust as a beneficiary.

It is not, and cannot be, a substitute for personalized legal and financial advice from qualified professionals.¹²

The intricacies of the SECURE Act, the stringent requirements for see-through trusts, the ever-changing landscape of federal and state tax law, and the unique dynamics of every family make it imperative to engage a team of experienced advisors.

An estate planning attorney is essential for drafting a trust that is legally sound and precisely tailored to the grantor’s goals.

A tax advisor or CPA is crucial for analyzing the tax consequences of different strategies and ensuring compliance.

A financial advisor can help coordinate beneficiary designations across all accounts and align them with the overall financial plan.¹²

Attempting to navigate this area without expert counsel is to risk costly errors that could undermine a lifetime of financial planning.

Section 7.3: Concluding Remarks: Building a Durable and Intentional Legacy

Beneficiary designations are among the most powerful and direct tools in estate planning.

They offer a streamlined path for transferring wealth that operates independently of a will, allowing assets to pass to loved ones privately and without the delays of probate.

The choice to elevate this strategy by naming a trust as a beneficiary is a significant one.

It represents a deliberate decision to trade the ease of direct inheritance for the profound benefits of long-term control, robust asset protection, and sophisticated management.

This path, however, is complex and demands meticulous attention to detail.

From the precise legal language on a form to the nuanced tax implications of different trust structures, every decision carries weight.

By understanding the foundational principles, weighing the strategic trade-offs, and engaging qualified professional advisors, an individual can use a trust to build a legacy that is not only generous but also durable, protected, and truly intentional, ensuring their wishes are carried out with precision for years to come.

Works cited

1. Trust Basics: What Is It, Types of Trusts, & Beneficiaries – Bank of America Private Bank, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.privatebank.bankofamerica.com/financial-education/understanding-trusts.html
2. Life Insurance Trusts Explained | Guardian, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.guardianlife.com/life-insurance/trusts
3. Should My Trust Be The Beneficiary Of My Life Insurance Policy? – O’Flaherty Law, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.oflaherty-law.com/learn-about-law/should-i-put-my-life-insurance-policy-in-my-revocable-living-trust
4. Pros and Cons of Naming a Trustee as a Beneficiary in Your Will – The Legacy Lawyers, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.thelegacylawyers.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-naming-a-trustee-as-a-beneficiary/
5. How to Name a Beneficiary – Frankel, Rubin, Klein, Payne & Pudlowski, P.C., accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.frankelrubin.com/how-to-name-a-beneficiary/
6. trust beneficiary | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/trust_beneficiary
7. Naming a Trust as IRA Beneficiary: Key Considerations – Fiduciary Trust, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.fiduciary-trust.com/insights/naming-trust-ira-beneficiary/
8. Naming a Trust as IRA Beneficiary – Greenleaf Trust, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://greenleaftrust.com/missives/naming-a-trust-as-ira-beneficiary/
9. When Does it Make Sense for a Trust to Own Your Life Insurance Policy? – Chase.com, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.chase.com/personal/investments/learning-and-insights/article/when-does-it-make-sense-for-a-trust-to-own-your-life-insurance-policy
10. Difference Between Trustee and Beneficiary | Albertson & Davidson, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.aldavlaw.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-beneficiary-and-trustee/
11. What is the Difference Between Being the Beneficiary of a Trust vs. a Will?, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://coloradoestateplan.com/difference-beneficiary-trust/
12. 10 Beneficiary Designation Tips – Wells Fargo Advisors, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.wellsfargoadvisors.com/planning/goals/estate-planning/beneficiary-designation-tips.htm
13. Understanding and Choosing Beneficiaries – Human Resources – The University of Arizona, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://hr.arizona.edu/benefits/benefits-overview/understanding-and-choosing-beneficiaries
14. Why naming beneficiaries is an essential part of estate planning | Ameriprise Financial, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ameriprise.com/financial-goals-priorities/family-estate/designation-of-beneficiary
15. Naming a Trust as Beneficiary of a Retirement Account: Pros and Cons – Investopedia, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/09/trust-beneficiaries.asp
16. Life Insurance Beneficiary Rules & Mistakes to Avoid – Trust & Will, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://trustandwill.com/learn/life-insurance-beneficiary-rules
17. Designating a Trust as Beneficiary of Individual Retirement Account …, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.drobnylaw.com/articles/designating-a-trust-as-beneficiary-of-individual-retirement-account-benefits
18. Life Insurance Beneficiary Mistakes to Avoid – CBI Bank & Trust, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.cbibt.com/uploads/userfiles/files/documents/CBI%20Trust%20News%20Fall%2021.pdf
19. 9 Mistakes to Avoid When Naming Beneficiaries – Joint Retirement Board, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://jrbcj.org/naming_beneficiaries/
20. Why Naming a Beneficiary Matters for Your Will and Trust – law firm in Tyler, TX, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://clfpc.com/why-naming-a-beneficiary-matters-for-your-will-and-trust/
21. Should you name a trust as your life insurance beneficiary? – SelectQuote, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.selectquote.com/life-insurance/articles/should-you-name-trust-as-life-insurance-beneficiary
22. Naming a Trust as a Beneficiary of Retirement Accounts | Lord Abbett, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.lordabbett.com/en-us/financial-advisor/insights/retirement-planning/naming-a-trust-as-a-beneficiary-of-retirement-accounts.html
23. Should My Trust Be The Beneficiary Of My Retirement Account? – O’Flaherty Law, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.oflaherty-law.com/learn-about-law/pros-cons-of-naming-a-trust-as-the-beneficiary-of-a-retirement-plan
24. Beware of These Life Insurance Beneficiary Mistakes | , Redondo Beach CA, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://fa.wellsfargoadvisors.com/riviera-wm/Beware-of-These-Life-Insurance-Beneficiary-Mistakes.c10209.htm
25. Who You Should Be Careful Naming as a Beneficiary (And Why) – Vollrath Law, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.vollrath-law.com/who-you-should-never-name-as-a-beneficiary/
26. Exploring the Pros and Cons of Naming a Trust as Your IRA Beneficiary, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://tcmccabe.com/articles/naming-trust-as-ira-beneficiary-pros-cons/
27. The Pros and Cons of Naming a Trust as a Beneficiary – City of Los Angeles Deferred Compensation Plan, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://la457.com/participant-blog/2019/8/22/retirement-account-pros-and-cons-of-naming-a-trust-as-a-beneficiary
28. Naming Your Trust as IRA beneficiary – Eagle Claw Capital Management, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.eagleclawcapital.com/info-resources/naming-your-trust-as-ira-beneficiary.html
29. Name a Trust as a Beneficiary – WillMaker, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.willmaker.com/legal-manual/wills/name-a-trust-as-a-beneficiary.html
30. Types of Trusts: Choosing the Right One for You | U.S. Bank, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.usbank.com/wealth-management/financial-perspectives/trust-and-estate-planning/types-of-trusts-which-should-i-choose.html
31. Conduit Or Accumulation Trust . – American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.aaepa.com/2016/01/9893-2/
32. Life Insurance and Trusts – The Law Office of Dennis Fordham, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://dennisfordhamlaw.com/life-insurance-and-trusts/
33. Should I Name a Person or a Trust as My Beneficiary on a Retirement Account?, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://mathewslawpllc.com/2025/03/11/should-i-name-a-person-or-a-trust-as-my-beneficiary-on-a-retirement-account/
34. What is a See-Through Trust? How Do They Work? – Western & Southern Financial Group, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.westernsouthern.com/retirement/see-through-trust
35. How to List Beneficiaries for Life Insurance While Having a Trust – Investopedia, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/revocable-living-trust.asp
36. Beneficiary Designation vs Will – What You Need to Know, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://trustandwill.com/learn/beneficiary-designation-vs-will
37. See-through Trust: Secure the Longest Possible RMD through your Estate Plan – Trust & Will, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://trustandwill.com/learn/see-through-trust
38. 7 Common Mistakes People Make When Creating a Trust. – Unsworth LaPlante, PLLC, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://unsworthlaplante.com/7-common-mistakes-people-make-when-creating-a-trust/
39. What are the disadvantages of naming a trust as your life insurance beneficiary?, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://ptmlegal.com/blog/what-are-the-disadvantages-of-naming-a-trust-as-your-life-insurance-beneficiary
40. Types of Trusts for Your Estate: Which Is Best for You? | Care Navigator – LTCFEDS, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ltcfeds.gov/care-navigator/types-of-trusts-for-your-estate-which-is-best-for-you
41. Avoid Common Mistakes with IRA Beneficiary Designations – Ascensus, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://thelink.ascensus.com/articles/2020/11/18/avoid-common-mistakes-with-ira-beneficiary-designations
42. www.willmaker.com, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.willmaker.com/legal-manual/wills/name-a-trust-as-a-beneficiary.html#:~:text=To%20leave%20property%20to%20your,Trust%2C%20dated%20January%201%2C%2020xx
43. life insurance beneficiary designations for trusts | buiusa, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.buiusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Beneficiary-Designations-Trusts.pdf
44. www.selectquote.com, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.selectquote.com/life-insurance/articles/should-you-name-trust-as-life-insurance-beneficiary#:~:text=Once%20you’ve%20set%20up,form%20sent%20via%20the%20mail.
45. How to name a beneficiary for a life insurance policy – FreeWill, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.freewill.com/learn/how-to-name-a-beneficiary-for-a-life-insurance-policy
46. The Importance of Keeping Beneficiary Designations Current – Covenant Trust, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://covenanttrust.com/the-importance-of-keeping-beneficiary-designations-current/
47. How to Name a Trust as Beneficiary of an IRA – SmartAsset, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://smartasset.com/retirement/trust-as-beneficiary-of-ira
48. Naming IRA Beneficiary: What You Need to Know – Equity Trust Company, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.trustetc.com/blog/whats-possible-when-naming-ira-beneficiary/
49. 7 beneficiary designation mistakes to avoid – U.S. Bank, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.usbank.com/financialiq/plan-your-future/trusts-and-estates/common-beneficiary-designation-mistakes-to-avoid.html
50. THE IMPORTANCE OF PROPER BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS – North Palm Beach Estate Planning Lawyer – Kitroser Lewis & Mighdoll, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.kitroserlaw.com/2024/04/17/the-importance-of-proper-beneficiary-designations/
51. 5 beneficiary designation mistakes you should avoid – MassMutual Blog, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://blog.massmutual.com/insurance/avoiding-beneficiary-mistakes
52. The Hidden Tax Risks of Naming a Trust as Your Retirement Account Beneficiary, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://aspire-planning.com/blog/2024/10/30/the-hidden-tax-risks-of-naming-a-trust-as-your-retirement-account-beneficiary
53. SECURE Act | Estate plan & inherited IRA | Fidelity, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/wealth-management/insights/iras-left-to-a-trust
54. Decedent’s Children as Retirement Account Beneficiaries – Northern Trust, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.northerntrust.com/united-states/institute/articles/decedents-children-retirement-account-beneficiaries
55. The Problem With Naming A Trust As The Beneficiary Of An Annuity – REAP, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://retirementestateplan.com/2016/02/the-problem-with-naming-a-trust-as-the-beneficiary-of-an-annuity/
56. The Difference Between a Conduit Trust and an Accumulation Trust, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.gwtrust.law/what-is-the-difference-between-a-conduit-trust-and-an-accumulation-trust/
57. See-Through Trusts – Identifying the Beneficiaries – Greenleaf Trust, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://greenleaftrust.com/missives/see-through-trusts-identifying-the-beneficiaries/
58. Page 1 of 11 I. Why Use Trusts to Hold Retirement Benefits? Some of the common reasons to use trusts to hold assets in lieu – Colorado Bar Association, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.cobar.org/Portals/COBAR/Repository/Sections/TE/orange/429/03-Colo_Lawyer_Article_OBFC.pdf?ver=2019-04-29-131552-407
59. Common mistakes when naming a beneficiary – Protective Life, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.protective.com/learn/common-mistakes-when-naming-a-beneficiary
60. 4 Common mistakes with retirement account beneficiary designations – Giving To Duke, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://giving.duke.edu/blueprints/4-common-mistakes-with-retirement-account-beneficiary-designations/
61. 8 Tips for Setting Up Your Beneficiary Designations, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.supportchildrenscolorado.org/ways-to-give/planned-giving/8-tips-for-setting-up-your-beneficiary-designations/