Table of Contents
Part I: The Illusion of Inclusion — My Struggle with Performative Diversity
I remember the day I was handed the diversity portfolio.
It felt like a promotion and a punishment all at once.
Our numbers were bad, our culture was stagnant, and the board wanted action.
I was ambitious, optimistic, and profoundly naive.
I believed that with enough resources and executive will, I could “fix” our diversity problem.
I saw it as a project with a start and an end date, a mountain to be climbed.
I had no idea I was about to walk into a swamp.
My journey began not with a bang, but with a series of well-intentioned, professionally sanctioned, and utterly disastrous missteps that would teach me more about failure than any success ever could.
A. The Checkbox Mandate: Kicking Off with All the Wrong Moves
My first move was straight from the corporate playbook: mandatory diversity training.
It seemed logical, efficient, and decisive.
We would roll it out to every employee, starting with senior management.
We hired a reputable firm, booked the conference rooms, and sent the calendar invites.
I saw it as laying a foundation of common knowledge.
My employees saw it as a mandatory root canal.
The resistance was immediate and palpable.
It wasn’t just the eye-rolls in the back of the room; it was a wave of resentment that I could feel crashing against the walls of my office.
I received emails questioning the use of company time.
Managers complained that it was a distraction from “real work.” I initially dismissed this as the predictable friction of change.
I was wrong.
Research I would only discover much later confirmed the futility of my approach.
Studies from Harvard have shown that forcing people into compulsory courses often provokes “anger and resistance,” with many participants reporting more animosity toward other groups after the training, not less.1
My attempt to build bridges was, in fact, digging trenches.
Without realizing it, I had framed Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) as a compliance exercise, a checkbox to be ticked.3
The very act of making it mandatory sent a clear message: this is something you
have to do, not something you want to be a part of.
It was performative, an exercise in “going through the motions to cross diversity off their list of priorities for that quarter”.1
It was perceived not as a genuine effort to improve our culture, but as a shallow attempt to stave off potential lawsuits or bad press—a key reason why so many training programs ultimately fail to make any meaningful impact.4
B. The Backfiring Business Case: When Good Intentions Pave the Road to Resistance
Reeling from the training debacle, I shifted tactics.
If the moral argument was met with cynicism, surely the business argument would prevail.
I armed myself with a formidable arsenal of data from the world’s top consulting firms.
I created presentations filled with charts showing how diverse teams drive innovation, how inclusive companies have higher cash flow per employee, and how gender-diverse executive teams are more likely to have above-average profitability.5
I marched into boardrooms and management meetings, ready to win over the skeptics with the undeniable logic of the bottom line.
The result was even more baffling than the first failure.
The presentations didn’t just fail to persuade; they seemed to actively harden the resistance.
In one particularly memorable meeting, a senior manager stood up and accused the initiative of being about “policing people,” not “unleashing innovation”.5
The more I pushed the financial benefits, the more they pushed back.
It was a painful and public lesson in human psychology.
It turns out that my experience was not unique.
Groundbreaking research from Harvard Business School shows that using the “business case” as the primary rationale for diversity can severely backfire.
It triggers resistance, defensiveness, and implicit biases, particularly among the very majority-group leaders whose buy-in is most critical.8
One study found that managers exposed to the business case for diversity were actually
less likely to promote a Black candidate than those who weren’t.
Another revealed they were less likely to even agree that diverse teams perform better.8
My focus on profit jumps and market share was seen as transactional and superficial.
It completely missed the point.
The issue wasn’t a line item on a balance sheet; it was about acknowledging a “history of exclusion and continuing race and gender hierarchies”.8
By trying to make it a rational, financial issue, I was ignoring the deeply human, emotional, and moral core of the problem.
This created a destructive feedback loop: the anger and resentment from the mandatory training primed my managers to be skeptical, and my business-case argument, far from winning them over, was perceived as a disingenuous, manipulative tactic.
The two failures compounded each other, leaving me with less credibility than when I started.
C. The Illusion of Inclusion: A Revolving Door of Diverse Talent
Despite the internal friction, my team and I doubled down on what we could control: recruitment.
We rewrote our job descriptions, attended diversity-focused career fairs, and partnered with new organizations.
And it worked.
Our entry-level diversity metrics began to climb.
We hired talented women, people of color, and individuals from a host of underrepresented backgrounds.
Our marketing materials proudly showcased our new, diverse faces.
For a fleeting moment, I felt a sense of victory.
The victory was short-lived.
A year later, I noticed a disturbing pattern in our HR data.
We had a revolving door.
The high-potential, diverse employees we had fought so hard to recruit were leaving at a significantly higher rate than their peers.
Our leadership pipeline remained stubbornly, depressingly homogenous.
We had successfully created what I would later learn to call the “illusion of inclusion”.9
The analogy that finally made it click for me was that of a cake.
Diversity, as one expert puts it, is the mix of ingredients—the flour, eggs, and sugar.
Inclusion is the effort it takes to make the mix work—the energy, the heat, the chemistry.9
We had been so focused on buying the best ingredients that we had completely neglected the process of baking the cake.
We had achieved a surface-level diversity, but we had failed utterly at inclusion.
Our organization was guilty of “diversity tokenism.” We were adding people from different backgrounds to look good, to check a box, but we weren’t empowering them or changing the system they were entering.10
This left them feeling isolated, frustrated, and used.
The high turnover rate was not a series of individual decisions; it was a clear, systemic signal that our work environment was not inclusive.
When people do not feel “seen, heard, and appreciated for who they are and what they bring to the organization, they will eventually leave”.9
My focus on “quantity (diverse statistics and metrics) vs. quality (valuing relationships of diverse employees)” was the final, critical mistake in my initial approach.9
This string of failures created a vicious cycle.
The lack of tangible results from my efforts led to “DEI fatigue” among senior leadership.
The very people who had championed the initiative began to question the investment.
The narrative was shifting from “we need to do this” to “this isn’t working.” The programmatic failures were creating the very conditions and justifications for abandoning DEI altogether, a phenomenon that has led many companies to quietly scale back their commitments in the face of economic pressure or political backlash.11
I was trapped in a cycle of my own making, and I had no idea how to get O.T.
Part II: The Irritant — Confronting the Systemic Failure
I hit rock bottom when my primary sponsor on the executive team pulled me aside.
“This isn’t working,” he said, his voice more weary than angry.
“The budget for this is on the chopping block for next year.
Unless you can show me something different, something that actually moves the needle, we’re done.” It was a devastating blow, but it was also the shock I needed.
The threat of failure, of having this entire effort collapse under my leadership, became the irritant that forced a profound change in my approach.
My old map was useless; it was time to draw a new one, starting with the one thing I hadn’t yet tried: listening.
A. The Listening Tour and the Data-Led Reckoning
At the advice of a mentor, I put a moratorium on all new DEI initiatives.
I stopped talking, presenting, and evangelizing.
Instead, I embarked on what one expert calls a “listening tour”.12
I held dozens of small, informal sessions with employees at all levels, particularly with our employee resource groups.
I asked two simple questions: “What is it really like to work here?” and “What is getting in your way?”
The stories poured O.T. They were raw, honest, and often painful to hear.
They were stories of being talked over in meetings, of being passed over for promotions without explanation, of seeing plum assignments go to the same people over and over again.
They were stories of feeling like a cultural outsider, of lacking mentors who looked like them or understood their journey.
To supplement these stories with hard data, I commissioned our first-ever comprehensive DEI audit.
This wasn’t a simple engagement survey; it was a deep diagnostic involving anonymous questionnaires, confidential focus groups, and a thorough review of our HR data—hiring, promotion, and attrition rates sliced by every demographic imaginable.3
This is a foundational step in any serious DEI effort: to assess the baseline, build a fact base, and identify the true, nuanced root causes of the challenges from the perspective of those most affected.13
The results of the audit were the “grit” that began my transformation.
They were an irritating, uncomfortable, but essential intrusion of truth into my flawed strategy.
The data was unequivocal.
Women were being promoted at a lower rate than men, despite equal performance ratings.
Employees of color reported significantly lower feelings of psychological safety.
Our much-lauded mentorship program was a myth; it existed on paper, but in reality, senior leaders almost exclusively mentored junior versions of themselves.
For the first time, I wasn’t guessing.
I was seeing the system, and its biases, laid bare.
B. Diagnosis: Programmatic Band-Aids on a Systemic Wound
The audit revealed the fundamental flaw in my thinking.
I had been treating DEI as a programmatic issue when it was, in fact, a systemic one.
The distinction is critical.
A programmatic approach involves isolated activities—bringing in speakers, hosting celebrations, running a training module.12
It’s like “trying to cure an illness by treating its symptoms”.12
A systemic approach, by contrast, does the “hard work of deeply analyzing and thoughtfully redesigning business processes like hiring, development and promotion patterns” to root out the ingrained inequities.12
My mandatory training, my business case presentations, my focus on recruitment numbers—these were all programmatic Band-Aids applied to a deep, systemic wound.
We were bringing diverse people into a system that was fundamentally not designed for them to succeed, and then wondering why they failed to thrive.
The problem wasn’t the people; it was the system.
I finally understood what experts mean when they say you cannot have a DEI strategy as a separate strategy.
It has to be tied into the very heart of the business strategy, because “separate is never equal”.5
A truly systemic approach requires embedding DEI into the core of the organization.
It means aligning DEI goals with broader business objectives, incorporating DEI metrics into manager performance evaluations, and deconstructing the very “perpetuation systems around inequalities”.3
It demanded a matrixed organizational strategy where DEI was not the sole responsibility of my department, but a shared accountability across every function and every leader.16
This realization was born from an act of vulnerability.
By launching the listening tour and the audit, I had to implicitly admit that I didn’t have the answers and that my initial strategy had failed.
This vulnerability, however, became a source of strength.
It disarmed the managers who had been resistant and engaged the employees who had felt ignored.
The “bad news” from the audit was no longer my personal failure; it was a shared, data-backed organizational problem.
It gave me the political and emotional capital to go back to the executive team not with another program, but with a diagnosis and a call for a fundamental, systemic transformation.
The grit was painful, but it was finally in a position to become a pearl.
Part III: The Pearl — The Epiphany of Creative Abrasion
The data from the audit gave me a diagnosis, but it didn’t give me a cure.
I understood the what—our systems were biased.
I didn’t yet understand the why—why should we undertake the difficult, expensive, and politically fraught work of changing them? The business case had backfired, and the moral case felt insufficient to drive sustained action.
The true epiphany, the moment that transformed my entire understanding of diversity, came from a simple, powerful analogy: “An element of diversity is like the grit in an oyster, important for the production of a pearl”.2
That single sentence unlocked a new mental model, one that reframed friction not as a problem to be solved, but as the very source of value we should be cultivating.
A. The “Grit in the Oyster” Analogy: Reframing Friction as Value
For months, I had been trying to smooth things over.
I saw the disagreements in meetings, the challenges to established norms, and the different ways of working as problems to be managed.
I was trying to make diversity comfortable.
The oyster analogy flipped my perspective on its head.
A pearl, a thing of immense beauty and value, is a defense mechanism.
It “would never have existed without initial irritation”.18
The oyster doesn’t seek out the grit, but when this foreign element—this irritant, this
difference—enters its shell, it responds by coating it in layers of nacre, transforming the source of discomfort into something precious.19
Suddenly, I saw our organization’s friction in a new light.
The “grit”—the dissenting opinions, the uncomfortable questions, the challenge to the status quo—wasn’t a sign of dysfunction.
It was a sign of potential.
It was the raw material of innovation.
My job as a leader was not to eliminate the grit.
It was to build an organization with the capacity to coat that grit in layers of psychological safety, respect, and inclusive processes until it became a pearl.
My goal shifted from harmony to productive friction.
As one source notes, for organizations to transform, they must actively seek out and use these bits of “grit”—be they threats, opportunities, or new ideas.20
B. From Demographic Metrics to Cognitive Diversity
This new lens immediately changed how I defined diversity itself.
I had been obsessed with demographic diversity—the visible mix of gender, race, and ethnicity.
While critically important as a matter of equity and a key pathway to our goal, I realized it wasn’t the end goal.
The true engine of the pearl-making process was cognitive diversity: differences in how people perceive the world, process information, and solve problems.21
Cognitive diversity is the unseen dimension.
It’s the difference between an analytical, data-driven thinker and an intuitive, big-picture thinker; between someone who thrives on structure and someone who excels in ambiguity.23
Research is robust on this point: teams with high cognitive diversity consistently outperform homogenous teams on complex tasks, delivering more innovative solutions and better business decisions.24
They are the ultimate antidote to groupthink, because their varied perspectives naturally lead them to challenge assumptions and spot unseen risks.23
My focus shifted from a numbers game to a capabilities game.
The question was no longer just, “Are we hiring enough women engineers?” but “Are we building teams that think differently?” This doesn’t diminish the importance of demographic diversity; in fact, it elevates it.
Recruiting people from different backgrounds, life experiences, and cultures is one of the most effective ways to bring different modes of thinking into an organization.
But it clarifies the objective: we seek demographic diversity as a powerful means to achieve the cognitive diversity that fuels innovation.
It’s a subtle but profound shift from a compliance mindset to a performance mindset.
C. Creative Abrasion: Harnessing Conflict for Breakthroughs
The practical application of the “grit in the oyster” philosophy is a concept called “creative abrasion.” Coined by Jerry Hirshberg, founder of Nissan Design International, creative abrasion is the process of generating ideas through the debate and discourse of differing viewpoints.27
It is the active, intentional harnessing of intellectual friction.
As Harvard professor Linda Hill describes it, innovative organizations “amplify differences, they don’t minimize them”.28
This is not brainstorming, where participants are asked to suspend judgment.
It is a rigorous, demanding process where ideas are sharpened against each other through respectful but intense challenge.26
My role as a leader was no longer to be a peacekeeper, but a facilitator of productive conflict.
This required building a culture with two essential components.
The first is a profound commitment to psychological safety—an environment where every team member feels safe to express dissenting opinions, ask tough questions, and propose novel ideas without fear of humiliation or retribution.24
The second is a set of clear ground rules for engagement.
To keep creative abrasion from devolving into destructive conflict, we established simple rules: debate ideas, never people; titles are left at the door during innovation sessions; and the goal is to listen to understand, not just to wait for your turn to speak.30
The evidence from companies that master this is compelling.
Case studies of firms like IBM, Google, and Procter & Gamble show that intentionally creating teams with cognitive diversity and managing them through a process of creative abrasion leads to tangible increases in innovation, higher productivity, and better problem-solving.2
This was the pearl I had been searching for.
It was a path to achieving the business results I had failed to argue for earlier, but through a process that was authentic, human-centered, and deeply respectful of the value of difference.
This journey from a programmatic to a systemic view represents a fundamental transformation in how an organization approaches DEI.
| Feature | Programmatic Approach (The Old Way) | Systemic Approach (The New Way) |
| Core Philosophy | DEI as a compliance, PR, or “feel-good” issue, separate from the core business. | DEI as a core driver of innovation, performance, and business strategy. |
| Leadership Role | Delegated to HR or a small DEI team; seen as a secondary responsibility. | CEO and the entire executive team are visibly committed, invested, and held accountable for results.3 |
| Primary Tactic | Mandatory, one-size-fits-all training; one-off events and celebrations.1 | Needs-based education; redesign of core processes (hiring, promotion); formal mentorship and sponsorship.32 |
| Focus of Diversity | Achieving demographic quotas; risk of tokenism and the “illusion of inclusion”.9 | Achieving cognitive diversity through the inclusive recruitment and development of people from all backgrounds.22 |
| View of Conflict | A problem to be minimized or avoided in the name of harmony. | “Creative abrasion” to be harnessed as the engine of innovation and better decision-making.26 |
| Metrics for Success | Surface-level metrics: hiring numbers, training completion rates, diversity percentages.9 | Deep metrics: promotion and retention rates by demographic, belonging scores, pay equity analysis, innovation outputs.3 |
| Responsibility | An HR or DEI department initiative, siloed from other business functions. | A shared responsibility integrated into all business functions and embedded in manager performance goals and evaluations.3 |
This shift led to a radical redefinition of a core concept.
I used to think of inclusion as making people feel welcome, like being invited to a party and asked to dance.17
This is about belonging, and it’s important.
But it’s incomplete.
The journey through the “grit” of data, the value of cognitive diversity, and the process of creative abrasion revealed a more powerful, strategic definition.
Inclusion is not a passive state of feeling comfortable.
Inclusion is the organizational capacity to harness the friction of diversity to produce value. It is an active, dynamic capability.
It is the collective skill of coating the grit of difference with the nacre of psychological safety to consistently create pearls of innovation.
This was the epiphany that changed everything.
Part IV: Cultivating the Pearl — Sustaining an Inclusive Ecosystem
The epiphany was exhilarating, but an insight without execution is just a daydream.
The final and most challenging phase of my journey was to translate this new philosophy into a living, breathing system.
This wasn’t about launching another initiative; it was about re-architecting the organization’s D.A. It required moving from the excitement of the “aha!” moment to the disciplined, long-term work of embedding this new way of thinking into our processes, our culture, and our daily habits.
This is the slow, patient work of cultivating pearls.
A. Architecting the System: A Blueprint for Sustainable Change
Armed with my new perspective and the data from our audit, my team and I began to architect a DEI strategy from the ground up.
We adopted a structured, multi-year framework modeled on the principles of leading strategic thought, which involves five key stages: Aspire, Assess, Architect, Act, and Advance.7
First, we worked with a diverse set of stakeholders—from executive leaders to our employee resource groups—to craft a bold but achievable aspiration.
This wasn’t a fluffy mission statement; it was a clear articulation of the future state we wanted to create and how it connected directly to our core business mission.7
Our aspiration was no longer just about being a “diverse company”; it was about becoming “an organization where the diverse experiences and perspectives of all our people drive innovation and transformative business results.”
Next, we used the data from our assessment to architect a portfolio of solutions tailored to the specific root causes we had identified.14
We abandoned the one-size-fits-all approach and focused on redesigning our core people processes.
For hiring, this meant implementing blind resume screening to focus on skills over names, ensuring diverse interview panels to mitigate “like-me” bias, and rewriting job descriptions to attract a wider range of thinking styles.10
For promotions, we created more transparent career pathways and established new criteria for advancement that valued inclusive leadership behaviors.
This was a fundamental shift from focusing only on recruitment to a holistic approach encompassing talent management, retention, and internal mobility.4
We treated our DEI goals with the same rigor as our financial targets, setting specific, measurable, and time-bound objectives with clear accountability measures for leaders at all levels.12
B. Fostering the Culture: Psychological Safety, Mentorship, and Allyship
A perfectly designed system will fail in a toxic culture.
The hard-won lesson from my initial failures was that systems and culture are two sides of the same coin.
Our single biggest focus, therefore, became fostering a culture of psychological safety.
This is the bedrock upon which creative abrasion can happen productively.
It is about creating an environment where employees feel safe enough to be vulnerable, to admit mistakes, to challenge the status quo, and to engage in the rigorous debate we now saw as essential.16
To build this culture, we launched our first-ever formal mentorship and sponsorship programs.
Research shows this is one of the single most effective interventions for increasing the representation of women and people of color in management, with some studies showing a boost of 9% to 25%.1
We engaged our mid-level and senior managers as active participants, making them diversity champions and increasing their on-the-job contact with colleagues from different backgrounds, a tactic proven to lessen bias over time.2
We also fundamentally changed our relationship with our Employee Resource Groups (ERGs).
Instead of treating them as social clubs, we recognized them as strategic business partners.
We provided them with executive sponsors, dedicated budgets, and a formal role in advising on business strategy.34
We emboldened and activated champions and allies at every level, providing them with the resources and training to become advocates for inclusion in their daily work.
These efforts to prioritize belonging and support were not just “nice to have”; they were critical for unlocking performance and retaining the diverse talent we worked so hard to attract.34
C. The Language of Inclusion: A Continuous Practice
Finally, we turned our attention to the most fundamental element of culture: language.
Language shapes reality.
The words we use, the idioms we fall back on, and the norms of conversation all send powerful signals about who belongs and who doesn’t.
We began a conscious, organization-wide effort to adopt more inclusive language.
This was not about creating a list of banned words or policing conversations.
It was about education and awareness.
We held workshops explaining why common phrases like “lower the bar” or “tribal knowledge” are problematic, as they are often rooted in harmful stereotypes and historical oppression.35
We normalized the practice of sharing pronouns in email signatures and meeting introductions, a simple act of respect that signals a safe environment for nonbinary and transgender colleagues.36
This was a continuous learning experience, an ongoing conversation about how our words impact others and how we can communicate with more care and precision.36
D. The Ongoing Journey: From Initiative to Identity
I now understand that this journey has no final destination.
DEI is not a problem to be “solved.” A truly inclusive organization is a living ecosystem that requires constant tending.
We have embedded mechanisms for continuous improvement into our operations.
We conduct regular pulse surveys to track our progress, we actively listen to feedback—including and especially from dissenting voices—and we are not afraid to course-correct when the data tells us an approach isn’t working.14
The success of companies like Walmart, which added childcare support to an upskilling program after participant feedback revealed it as a barrier, shows the power of this rigorous tracking and adaptation.14
This entire transformation represents a shift from seeing DEI as a program—an “application” you install on top of the business—to seeing it as the company’s fundamental “operating system.” A systemic approach upgrades the entire OS.
It changes how decisions are made (through creative abrasion), how resources are allocated (through equitable processes), how people communicate (through inclusive language), and how the system itself learns and evolves (through feedback loops).
When DEI becomes the operating system, it is no longer a separate initiative.
It is simply “the way we do business.” It becomes part of the organization’s core identity.
The “grit” of new challenges, new perspectives, and new frictions will never stop arriving.
Our work of cultivating pearls is never done.
But today, instead of dreading that friction, we welcome it.
We recognize it as the essential, irritating, and ultimately beautiful source of our creativity, our resilience, and our strength.
Works cited
- Here’s why diversity programs fail – AboveBoard Blog, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://blog.aboveboard.com/why-do-diversity-programs-fail
- Why Diversity Programs Fail, Harvard Business Review | Health …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.healthenterprisesnetwork.com/2021/08/26/why-diversity-programs-fail-harvard-business-review/
- 5 Main Components Needed for Effective DEI Programming – Inclusion Geeks, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.inclusiongeeks.com/articles/5-main-components-needed-for-effective-dei-programming/
- Why Your DEI Initiatives Are Failing And How You Can Fix Them | Knockri, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://knockri.com/blog/diversityandinclusion/dei-initiatives/
- DEI: What It Is & How to Champion It in the Workplace – Harvard Business School Online, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/what-is-dei
- Diversity Drives Results: The Business Case for DEI, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://diversity.com/post/business-case-for-dei
- It’s (past) time to get strategic about DEI – McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/its-past-time-to-get-strategic-about-dei
- The ‘Why’ Behind DEI May Predict Long-Term Success – Harvard Business School, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.hbs.edu/bigs/long-term-success-with-dei
- The Illusion of Inclusion – NALP – National Association for Law Placement, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.nalp.org/illusion-of-inclusion
- Three Components of Workplace Inclusion – Institute For Diversity Certification, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.diversitycertification.org/deia-matters-blog/three-components-of-workplace-inclusion
- Why Some Companies Are Scaling Back DEI & What It Means for Employees – Diversity.com, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://diversity.com/post/companies-scaling-back-dei-impact-employees
- Effective DE&I Strategies Focus On Systemic Change – Forbes, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2023/05/03/effective-dei-strategies-focus-on-systemic-change/
- Diversity, Equity & Inclusion | People & Organizational Performance | McKinsey & Company, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/how-we-help-clients/diversity-equity-and-inclusion
- 2023 DEI initiatives report: Inside the lighthouses | McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-lighthouses-2023
- A Systemic Approach to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. | by Social Ink Lab – Medium, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@social.ink.lab/a-systemic-approach-to-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-c6986960aefb
- Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Framework – American Psychological Association, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.apa.org/about/apa/equity-diversity-inclusion/framework
- Diversity Explained By Analogy Metaphor Examples – Metamia, accessed on August 7, 2025, http://www.metamia.com/analogize.php?q=diversity
- The pearl in the oyster – Reflections.ie, accessed on August 7, 2025, http://reflections.ie/index.php/2017/06/16/the-pearl-in-the-oyster/
- Tools for resilience – the pearl and the oyster – Catrin MacDonnell Coaching & Training, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.catrinmacdonnell.co.uk/tools-resilience-pearl-oyster/
- The Grit in the Oyster – It’s the price you pay for a pearl. – Defy Expectations, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.defyexpectations.co.uk/blog/the-grit-in-the-oyster
- The Impact of Cognitive Style Diversity on Implicit Learning in Teams – Frontiers, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00112/full
- Unlocking the Power of Cognitive Diversity – Psychology Today, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/brain-reboot/202309/unlocking-the-power-of-cognitive-diversity
- The importance of cognitive diversity in workplace teams – ILX Group, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ilxgroup.com/usa/blog/the-importance-of-cognitive-diversity-in-workplace-teams
- Unlocking Team Potential: The Power Of Cognitive Diversity And Psychological Safety, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/02/04/unlocking-team-potential-the-power-of-cognitive-diversity-and-psychological-safety/
- www.forbes.com, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/02/04/unlocking-team-potential-the-power-of-cognitive-diversity-and-psychological-safety/#:~:text=The%20Role%20Of%20Cognitive%20Diversity&text=Evidence%20of%20the%20benefits%20of,wider%20range%20of%20possible%20outcomes.
- Create Abrasion To Ignite Innovation | by Barry J Barresi OD PhD, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://avplaybook.com/create-abrasion-to-ignite-innovation-42a10ca453a0
- Creative Abrasion: From Conflict to Collaboration | KnowledgeSources, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://knowledgesources.com/2024/10/01/creative-abrasion-from-conflict-to-collaboration/
- How to Manage for Collective Creativity – Linda Hill | Laidlaw Scholars Network, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://laidlawscholars.network/posts/56704-how-to-manage-for-collective-creativity-linda-hill
- Creative Abrasion: 4 Strategies to Introduce Healthy Conflict Among Your Team, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.success.com/what-is-creative-abrasion/
- Embracing Creative Abrasion At Your Conflict-Averse Company – Forbes, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2022/01/21/embracing-creative-abrasion-at-your-conflict-averse-company/
- The Impact of Cognitive Diversity on Team Performance: A Deep Dive into Assessment Techniques” – Psicosmart, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://blogs.psico-smart.com/blog-the-impact-of-cognitive-diversity-on-team-performance-a-deep-dive-into-assessment-techniques-183481
- 6 Elements of a Successful Workplace Diversity Program – EVERFI, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://everfi.com/blog/workplace-training/elements-successful-workplace-diversity-program/
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts at a Departmental Level: Building a Committee as a Vehicle for Advancing Progress – PubMed Central, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8444514/
- Diversity matters even more: The case for holistic impact – McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-matters-even-more-the-case-for-holistic-impact
- IT Inclusive Language Guide – Information Technology – UW-IT – University of Washington, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://it.uw.edu/guides/identity-diversity-inclusion/inclusive-language-guide/
- 12 Essential DEI Topics for the Workplace | SC Training, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://training.safetyculture.com/blog/10-dei-topics/
