The Rise and Fall of the Indiana Inheritance Tax: A Centennial Review and Post-Mortem Analysis (1913-2013)

Introduction: The End of a Taxing Era

Executive Summary

For precisely one century, from its inception in 1913 to its abolition in 2013, the Indiana Inheritance Tax was a fixture of the state’s fiscal and legal landscape.¹

More than a simple revenue mechanism, it profoundly shaped wealth transfer, incentivized complex estate planning, and became a focal point of legislative debate for decades.

The tax, often colloquially and politically labeled a “death tax,” was not a singular levy but part of a complex ecosystem that included a separate state estate tax and the overarching federal estate tax.

Its structure, which levied a tax not on the decedent’s estate but on the share each individual beneficiary received, created a tiered system of heirs, with tax burdens varying dramatically based on kinship to the deceased.³

On May 8, 2013, Governor Mike Pence signed House Enrolled Act 1001, which retroactively repealed the Indiana Inheritance Tax for all individuals deceased after December 31, 2012.⁵

This act marked the culmination of a long-fought battle by repeal proponents, who argued the tax was economically uncompetitive, administratively burdensome, and particularly punitive to asset-rich, cash-poor family farms and businesses.⁷

This report provides a definitive legal, historical, and economic analysis of the Indiana Inheritance Tax.

It deconstructs its intricate statutory framework, examines its real-world impact on Hoosier families, chronicles the legislative forces that led to its abolition, and assesses its enduring legacy for legal practitioners, financial advisors, and Indiana residents.

Scope and Methodology

This report synthesizes a century of legal and economic history, drawing upon Indiana’s statutory code, legislative records, administrative documents from the Indiana Department of Revenue, professional legal commentary, and contemporary news analysis.

A critical objective of this analysis is to clarify the distinct nature of three separate taxes often conflated in public discourse:

1. The Indiana Inheritance Tax: A state tax paid by the beneficiary, with rates and exemptions based on the beneficiary’s relationship to the decedent.⁴ This is the primary subject of this report.
2. The Indiana Estate Tax: A state-level “pick-up” tax designed solely to absorb the maximum credit allowable against the federal estate tax for state death taxes paid.¹⁰ This tax became obsolete after federal tax law changes in the early 2000s.¹⁰
3. The Federal Estate Tax: A federal tax levied on the total value of a decedent’s estate, which remains in effect and is a critical planning consideration for high-net-worth individuals.¹²

By delineating these concepts, this report provides a clear and precise framework for understanding the rise, function, and ultimate fall of Indiana’s unique approach to taxing wealth at death.

Part I: The Anatomy of the Indiana Inheritance Tax

To comprehend the arguments for its repeal and its lasting impact, one must first understand the technical and legal architecture of the Indiana Inheritance Tax.

It was not a simple, flat tax but a complex, multi-layered system predicated on a fundamental distinction from its federal counterpart.

A Tax on the Beneficiary, Not the Estate

The foundational principle of the Indiana system was its status as an inheritance tax, not an estate tax.⁴

Whereas an estate tax is calculated on the net value of the decedent’s entire estate before any assets are distributed, an inheritance tax is levied directly upon the individuals or entities receiving the property.³

The tax liability was shouldered by the heir, and the amount due was calculated based on two factors: the value of the specific assets received by that heir and their legal relationship to the person who died.⁴

This core distinction gave rise to the law’s most defining feature: the three-class beneficiary system.

The Three-Class System: A Hierarchy of Heirs

The Indiana Inheritance Tax statute created a rigid hierarchy of beneficiaries, sorting them into three classes that determined their tax treatment.

This classification was not merely an administrative convenience; it was a codified expression of social policy, explicitly favoring the transfer of wealth within a narrowly defined family structure while penalizing transfers to more distant relatives or non-family members.

The massive disparity in exemptions and rates between the classes financially incentivized testators to keep wealth concentrated within the immediate family to minimize tax erosion.

• Class A – The Inner Circle: This was the most favored class, reserved for the decedent’s closest relatives. It included parents, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, and other direct lineal ancestors and descendants.¹⁵ In a significant legislative change enacted in 2012 through Senate Enrolled Act (SEA) 293, this premier class was expanded to include the spouse, widow, or widower of a child or stepchild (i.e., sons-in-law and daughters-in-law).³ This move elevated them from their previous, less favorable class statuses, broadening the definition of the immediate family unit.
• Class B – Collateral Relatives: This intermediate class consisted of the decedent’s brothers, sisters, and the lineal descendants of those siblings (nieces and nephews).³ Before the 2012 legislative changes, this class also included sons-in-law and daughters-in-law.¹⁵
• Class C – All Others: This was a broad, catch-all category for any beneficiary who did not qualify for Class A or Class B. It included aunts, uncles, cousins, friends, nieces and nephews by marriage, and non-charitable corporations or entities.⁶ Heirs in this class faced the most punitive tax treatment, with the smallest exemptions and the highest tax rates, making bequests to friends or more distant family a costly proposition.¹⁶

Exemptions and Progressive Rates: The Financial Mechanics

The financial impact of the tax was dictated by a schedule of exemptions and progressive tax rates that varied dramatically by beneficiary class.

The legislature made a pivotal change to this structure in 2012 as the first step toward abolition, a move that starkly illustrated the policy priorities at play.

• Exemptions: The exemption was the amount an heir could receive tax-free. Surviving spouses and qualified charitable organizations were always granted a 100% exemption, meaning they paid no inheritance tax.³ For all other heirs, the exemption amounts were as follows:

• Pre-2012 Structure: For deaths occurring before January 1, 2012, the exemption for a Class A beneficiary was $100,000.¹⁵ Class B beneficiaries received a mere $500 exemption, and Class C beneficiaries received only a $100 exemption.⁹
• The 2012 Overhaul (SEA 293): For deaths on or after January 1, 2012, the legislature dramatically increased the Class A exemption to $250,000.³ This was the centerpiece of the phase-out legislation. However, the exemptions for Class B ($500) and Class C ($100) were left unchanged, a clear political compromise that provided significant relief to direct descendants while offering none to other relatives or friends.³

The following table demonstrates the significant policy shift enacted by SEA 293 in 2012.

It provides a clear, visual comparison of the beneficiary classes and exemption amounts immediately before and after the law took effect, highlighting the legislature’s focus on providing relief to direct heirs.

Table 1: Indiana Inheritance Tax Exemptions & Class Definitions (Pre- and Post-Jan 1, 2012)

Beneficiary Class	Class Definition (Deaths Before Jan 1, 2012) 15	Exemption Amount (Pre-2012) 15	Class Definition (Deaths On/After Jan 1, 2012) 3	Exemption Amount (On/After Jan 1, 2012) 3
Spouse/Charity	Surviving spouse; qualified charitable organization	100%	Surviving spouse; qualified charitable organization	100%
Class A	Parents, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, other lineal ancestors/descendants	$100,000	Parents, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, other lineal ancestors/descendants, spouse/widow(er) of a child or stepchild	$250,000
Class B	Brothers, sisters, lineal descendants of brothers/sisters, daughters-in-law, sons-in-law	$500	Brothers, sisters, lineal descendants of brothers/sisters	$500
Class C	All others not in Class A or B (e.g., aunts, uncles, cousins, friends)	$100	All others not in Class A or B (e.g., aunts, uncles, cousins, friends)	$100

• Progressive Rate Schedules: After subtracting the applicable exemption, the remaining net taxable value of the inheritance was subject to a progressive, multi-bracket tax rate. The rates escalated with the size of the inheritance and were significantly higher for the lower classes. The tax rates ranged from a low of $1\% for the first taxable bracket in Class A to a high of $20\% for the top bracket in Class C.⁵

The table below details the specific, legally mandated tax rate schedules for each beneficiary class as they existed just prior to the full repeal.

This table serves as a definitive reference for analyzing pre-2013 estate scenarios and understanding the precise economic burden of the tax.

Table 2: Indiana Inheritance Tax Rate Schedules by Beneficiary Class (Pre-Repeal) ⁹

Class	Net Taxable Value of Property Interests Transferred	Inheritance Tax Due
A	$25,000 or less	$1\% of net taxable value
	Over $25,000 but not over $50,000	$250, plus $2\% of value over $25,000
	Over $50,000 but not over $200,000	$750, plus $3\% of value over $50,000
	Over $200,000 but not over $300,000	$5,250, plus $4\% of value over $200,000
	Over $300,000 but not over $500,000	$9,250, plus $5\% of value over $300,000
	Over $500,000 but not over $700,000	$19,250, plus $6\% of value over $500,000
	Over $700,000 but not over $1,000,000	$31,250, plus $7\% of value over $700,000
	Over $1,000,000 but not over $1,500,000	$52,250, plus $8\% of value over $1,000,000
	Over $1,500,000	$92,250, plus $10\% of value over $1,500,000
B	$100,000 or less	$7\% of net taxable value
	Over $100,000 but not over $500,000	$7,000, plus $10\% of value over $100,000
	Over $500,000 but not over $1,000,000	$47,000, plus $12\% of value over $500,000
	Over $1,000,000	$107,000, plus $15\% of value over $1,000,000
C	$100,000 or less	$10\% of net taxable value
	Over $100,000 but not over $1,000,000	$10,000, plus $15\% of value over $1,000,000
	Over $1,000,000	$145,000, plus $20\% of value over $1,000,000

The State-Federal Death Tax Ecosystem

The Indiana Inheritance Tax did not operate in a vacuum.

It was part of a broader state and federal framework for taxing wealth transfers.

• Indiana’s “Pick-Up” Estate Tax: In addition to the inheritance tax, Indiana had a separate state estate tax.¹¹ This was not an additional tax in the conventional sense but rather a “pick-up” tax designed to ensure Indiana received the full benefit of a federal tax provision.¹ Prior to 2005, federal law allowed estates to claim a credit for state death taxes paid, up to a certain amount. Indiana’s estate tax was structured to be the difference between the maximum allowable federal credit and the amount of inheritance tax actually paid by the beneficiaries.¹ This ensured that the state collected revenue that would have otherwise gone to the federal government, without increasing the estate’s total tax burden. However, the federal Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) phased out the state death tax credit, replacing it with a less valuable deduction after 2004.¹⁰ This federal change effectively nullified Indiana’s pick-up estate tax, a fact that was formally codified when the state repealed the obsolete law in 2013.¹⁰ The same legislation also repealed Indiana’s generation-skipping transfer tax, which was similarly tied to a defunct federal credit.¹⁰
• The Federal Estate Tax: It is essential to distinguish Indiana’s system from the federal estate tax. The federal tax is levied on the entire taxable estate, applies nationwide, and has historically had a much higher exemption amount than Indiana’s tax (e.g., $5.25 million in 2013).⁵ Even after the repeal of all Indiana-specific death taxes, high-net-worth Hoosiers remain subject to the federal estate tax, making continued estate planning a critical necessity.¹³

Part II: The Real-World Impact on Hoosier Families and Businesses

The complex legal mechanics of the inheritance tax translated into significant, and often burdensome, real-world consequences for Indiana residents.

The tax’s structure created practical challenges that went beyond a simple line item on a ledger, influencing family decisions, driving demand for professional services, and placing particular strain on the state’s agricultural community.

The Liquidity Crisis and Forced Sales

A central problem created by the inheritance tax was the mismatch between the nature of the assets inherited and the nature of the tax payment required.

The tax was due in cash to the county treasurer, typically within one year of the decedent’s death (a 5% discount was offered for payment within nine months).⁸

However, many inheritances, especially larger ones, consisted primarily of non-liquid assets such as real estate, farm equipment, or a closely-held family business.⁸

This dynamic frequently created a “liquidity crisis” for beneficiaries.

Heirs could find themselves legally owning a valuable farm or property but lacking the cash on hand to pay the six- or seven-figure tax bill.

This often left them with no choice but to sell all or part of the inherited asset—sometimes against their personal wishes or the decedent’s intent—simply to generate the funds needed to satisfy the government’s claim.⁸

This potential for forced sales became a powerful and emotionally resonant argument for the tax’s repeal, as it was portrayed as a destructive force that broke up family legacies.

A Special Case: The Indiana Family Farm

Nowhere was the liquidity crisis more acute or the arguments against the tax more potent than in Indiana’s agricultural sector.

Several converging factors made family farms uniquely vulnerable to the inheritance tax.

• The “Asset-Rich, Cash-Poor” Dilemma: The quintessential family farm is the classic example of an “asset-rich, cash-poor” entity. Farmers’ balance sheets often showed immense value tied up in land, buildings, and machinery, yet their operational cash flow could be modest and variable.⁸ They were wealthy on paper but often lacked the liquid capital to easily absorb a large, unexpected tax liability.
• Skyrocketing Land Values: In the decade leading up to the repeal, the market value of Indiana farmland increased substantially.⁶ While this was beneficial for the owners’ net worth, it had the perilous side effect of dramatically inflating their potential inheritance tax liability. A farm that might have passed to the next generation with little tax consequence in the 1990s could suddenly face a massive tax bill in the 2000s due to this appreciation alone.⁶
• Illustrative Scenarios: The financial strain was not theoretical. Purdue Extension agricultural economists and estate planning attorneys provided concrete examples that fueled the repeal debate. One widely cited scenario involved a farm estate valued at $4.5 million passing to three children (Class A beneficiaries). Even with the most favorable tax treatment, the total inheritance tax bill would be $216,750, or $72,250 per child.⁶ Another example highlighted the punitive nature of the tax on non-family transfers: three siblings inheriting a
  $1 million parcel of land from a family friend (a Class C transfer) would face a tax bill of approximately $100,000.⁶ Perhaps most starkly, one attorney recounted the story of a client whose parents died without an adequate estate plan, resulting in a tax bill of over
  $700,000 that forced the sale of the family farm.²⁶
• The Valuation Problem: The tax was assessed on the “fair market value” of the property.²⁸ For farmland located near developing urban or suburban areas, this could mean the land was valued not for its agricultural use, but at the much higher price a commercial or residential developer might pay.²⁹ This practice could inflate the taxable value of the farm, pushing the tax bill even higher and making it more likely that the land would have to be sold for development to pay the tax—the exact opposite of preserving the family farm.

Estate Planning as a Mitigation Imperative

The existence of the inheritance tax, with its complexities and significant financial risks, made sophisticated estate planning a practical necessity for a wide swath of the population, not just the ultra-wealthy.

The tax inadvertently acted as a catalyst for the growth of the estate planning industry in Indiana.

Those who failed to plan, or who could not afford professional guidance, were the most exposed to the tax’s full impact.

This effectively created a two-tiered system: one for the well-advised who could navigate the code’s complexities, and another for the unprepared who bore a disproportionate share of the burden.

Common mitigation strategies included:

• Trusts: Various forms of trusts were a cornerstone of inheritance tax planning. Irrevocable trusts could be used to move assets out of a person’s direct ownership, while life insurance trusts were designed to hold policies whose proceeds could pay the tax bill.³⁰ In a move to close a potential loophole, the 2012 phase-out legislation (SEA 293) included a provision requiring the Department of Revenue to “look through” trusts and other entities to tax each ultimate beneficial owner according to their individual class status.³
• Strategic Gifting: A popular technique was to reduce the size of the eventual taxable estate by making lifetime gifts. Individuals could take advantage of the annual federal gift tax exclusion to transfer assets to heirs incrementally over many years, lowering the value subject to the inheritance tax at death.²⁶
• Life Insurance: Because life insurance proceeds paid to a named individual beneficiary were generally exempt from the Indiana inheritance tax, policies were frequently purchased for the specific purpose of providing tax-free cash to the estate.⁶ This liquidity could then be used to pay the inheritance tax due on other assets, like a farm or business, thereby preventing a forced sale.³¹
• Business Structures: For family businesses and farms, creating entities like Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) or Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) was a common strategy. These structures could help formalize the transfer of ownership to the next generation and, in some cases, allow for valuation discounts on the business interests, which would in turn lower the tax liability.²⁶

Part III: The Legislative Path to Abolition (2012-2013)

The dismantling of a century-old tax system was not a sudden event but the culmination of decades of pressure and a two-year legislative endgame.

The path to abolition was paved by a convergence of economic arguments, political narratives, and a critical shift in the state’s fiscal landscape.

The Gathering Momentum for Repeal

By the early 2010s, a powerful coalition of arguments had aligned against the inheritance tax.

• Economic Competitiveness and “Tax Flight”: A chief argument of repeal proponents was that Indiana was at a competitive disadvantage. Wealthy individuals, particularly retirees, were said to be establishing residency in states with no death tax, most notably Florida, to shield their estates from Indiana’s levy.⁷ This “tax flight” meant the loss of not only the inheritance tax revenue but also income tax revenue and community leadership from these individuals. Furthermore, neighboring states like Michigan and Ohio had already eliminated their inheritance taxes, and Kentucky did not tax transfers to children, making Indiana an outlier in the region.³⁸
• Administrative Burden and Inefficiency: Critics relentlessly attacked the tax as inefficient and costly to administer. The filing process was notoriously cumbersome, involving the local county assessor, the county probate court, and the state Department of Revenue.⁷ For small inheritances, particularly those going to Class C beneficiaries, the legal and accounting fees required to prepare and file the tax return could easily exceed the actual tax owed.⁷ One anecdote highlighted a non-relative receiving
  $101; after the $100 Class C exemption, the tax due would be 10 cents on the remaining dollar, yet the filing costs could be $750 or more.⁷
• The “Death Tax” Narrative: For decades, opponents had successfully framed the levy as an immoral “death tax” that unfairly punished families for passing on the fruits of a lifetime of labor, savings, and investment.³⁹ This narrative was especially effective when paired with stories of family farms and small businesses being jeopardized. This emotional and political framing had fueled an estimated 16 different legislative attempts to repeal the tax since 1979.⁷

The Fiscal Counterpoint: Revenue Replacement

For most of its history, the single greatest obstacle to repealing the inheritance tax was the question of lost revenue.

The tax was a significant, if unreliable, source of funds, with 92% of collections going to the state’s general fund and the remaining 8% to the counties.⁷

For years, legislative efforts stalled on the simple question: “Where are we going to find replacement revenue?”.⁷

Any successful repeal effort would have to address this fiscal reality.

A Two-Act Repeal

The legislative breakthrough came in two distinct acts over two consecutive years.

The 2012 law was a politically necessary compromise that broke a decades-long deadlock, acting as a “proof of concept” for repeal.

It demonstrated that a path forward was possible, which in turn unleashed the political momentum for a full and immediate abolition just one year later.

• Act I – The 2012 Phase-Out (Senate Enrolled Act 293): The 2012 legislative session marked the turning point. After years of failed attempts, the General Assembly passed SEA 293, which was signed into law by Governor Mitch Daniels on March 20, 2012.³ This was a landmark compromise that initiated the end of the tax. Its key provisions were:

1. A Massive Class A Exemption Increase: The exemption for direct heirs was more than doubled, from $100,000 to $250,000.³
2. An Expanded Class A Definition: Sons- and daughters-in-law were moved into the favored Class A.³
3. A Gradual Phase-Out: The bill established a 10-year phase-out of the entire tax, to be accomplished via a tax credit. For deaths in 2013, the calculated tax would be reduced by a $10\% credit. This credit would increase by $10\% each subsequent year until it reached $100\% in 2022, at which point the tax would be fully eliminated.³
   
   The bill passed the House with a decisive 80-17 vote, signaling a major shift in legislative will.38 The gradual nature of the phase-out and the focus on the most politically sympathetic beneficiaries (Class A) were key compromises that finally overcame the long-standing revenue concerns.

• Act II – The 2013 Final Act (House Enrolled Act 1001): The cautious, 10-year phase-out proved to be short-lived. By the 2013 session, with an improving state economy and a new administration under Governor Mike Pence, the political appetite had grown for a more aggressive tax cut.⁷ As part of a sweeping tax relief package billed as the largest in state history, the General Assembly passed HEA 1001.⁴¹ This bill did not just accelerate the phase-out; it eliminated it entirely.
• Key Provisions: HEA 1001 fully and retroactively repealed the Indiana Inheritance Tax for any decedent whose death occurred after December 31, 2012.⁵ It also formally repealed the state’s long-defunct “pick-up” estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes, cleaning up the Indiana Code.¹⁰
  
  Governor Pence signed the bill on May 8, 2013, bringing the century-long history of the tax to an abrupt and final end.5 The rapid move from a decade-long phase-out to immediate abolition demonstrated that once the initial legislative barrier was broken in 2012, the political momentum for full repeal became overwhelming.

Part IV: The Legacy and Administrative Aftermath

The repeal of the inheritance tax was a significant act of tax policy simplification, but it did not instantly erase a century of accumulated law and administrative practice.

The aftermath involved a careful unwinding of the old system, a new set of challenges for estate planning professionals, and a lasting legacy preserved in the state’s archives.

Unwinding a Century-Old System

The retroactive nature of the repeal created a distinct cutoff date: December 31, 2012.

Estates of individuals who died on or before that date remained subject to the old law, while estates of those who died on or after January 1, 2013, were free of it.

This necessitated a complex transition.

• The Transition Period: The Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) and county assessors had to manage a dual system for several years. They continued to process returns, conduct audits, and handle issues like after-discovered assets for pre-2013 deaths, even as they ceased applying the law to new estates.⁴² The DOR anticipated that this work would likely continue through mid-2014 and beyond, requiring a gradual reduction in specialized staff.⁴³
• Retirement of Forms: One of the most immediate and welcome effects of the repeal was the elimination of a raft of administrative paperwork for post-2012 estates. Key forms rendered obsolete included:

• IH-6 (Indiana Resident Inheritance Tax Return) and IH-12 (Nonresident Return).⁴⁵
• IH-14 (Application for Consent to Transfer) and IH-19 (Notice of Intended Transfer of Checking Account).⁴⁴
  
  The elimination of the Form IH-14, often called a “tax waiver,” was a particularly significant benefit. Financial institutions had required this form, approved by the county assessor, before they would release a decedent’s assets to an heir.45 Removing this step streamlined the process of settling an estate and gave beneficiaries faster access to inherited accounts.5
• Refunds and County Replacement Funds: The repeal legislation, HEA 1001, contained specific provisions to manage the financial transition. It established a process for issuing refunds (using Form IH-5) to any estate that had already paid taxes on a 2013 death before the retroactive repeal was signed into law.¹⁰ It also created a mechanism for a one-time “inheritance tax replacement amount” to be distributed to counties to partially compensate them for the future loss of their 8% share of the tax revenue.¹⁰ This conscious decision to accept the revenue loss in exchange for other benefits is a hallmark of the repeal’s character as an act of tax simplification.

The “False Sense of Security”: Enduring Need for Estate Planning

A crucial legacy of the repeal is the potential for public misunderstanding.

Estate planning professionals immediately began to warn clients and the public not to be “lulled into a false sense of security” by the news.²⁵

While the Indiana-specific tax was gone, significant tax and planning considerations remained.

• The Federal Estate Tax Looms: The federal estate tax, with its $40\% rate and high exemption threshold, was unaffected by the state-level repeal.¹² For high-net-worth families in Indiana, planning to minimize federal estate tax liability remains a paramount concern.
• Out-of-State Property Risk: The repeal only applied to Indiana’s tax. A resident of Indiana who owns property in another state—such as a vacation home in Illinois or a business interest in Kentucky—may find that property subject to that state’s own estate or inheritance tax.³³ As of 2024, twelve states and the District of Columbia still levy an estate tax, and five states levy an inheritance tax.⁴
• Capital Gains Tax: With the inheritance tax gone, the focus of tax planning for many estates shifted to minimizing capital gains tax. A key provision in federal tax law allows for a “step-up in basis” at death, where the cost basis of an inherited asset is adjusted to its fair market value on the date of death.¹³ This erases the taxable capital gain that accrued during the decedent’s lifetime. Legal experts emphasized the critical importance of properly valuing assets at the time of death to document this new basis and mitigate future capital gains taxes for heirs who later sell the assets.²⁵

Historical Records for Future Research

Though the tax itself is defunct, its records endure.

The Indiana State Archives maintains two significant collections related to the inheritance tax that are invaluable to genealogists, historians, and economic researchers.²

These collections include:

1. Original quarterly county treasurers’ reports from 1913 to 1933, which contain detailed information on estates, names of heirs, their relationships to the deceased, and the amount of tax paid.
2. Approximately 275,000 index cards to inheritance tax schedules from all 92 Indiana counties, covering the years 1913 to 1968, which list the decedent’s name, county, date of death, and tax information.
   These archives provide a unique window into a century of wealth, family structures, and economic life in Indiana.2

Conclusion: Lessons from a Century of State-Level Taxation

The century-long story of the Indiana Inheritance Tax offers a compelling case study in the lifecycle of tax policy.

It began in the Progressive Era as a tool to generate revenue and was modeled on the laws of other states like New York.¹

Over the decades, it evolved into an administratively complex system with a codified social preference for nuclear family wealth transfer.

Ultimately, it was dismantled when its economic and compliance costs were judged to have outweighed its revenue benefits.

The convergence of several powerful forces—the liquidity burden on family farms exacerbated by rising land values, the competitive pressure from tax-free neighboring states, and a broader political movement favoring tax simplification and reduction—created the conditions for its rapid demise between 2012 and 2013.

For legal and financial professionals advising Indiana clients today, the lessons from the post-repeal landscape are clear and actionable:

1. The Federal Estate Tax is the Primary Concern: Planning must now be oriented toward the federal system for any client with a net worth approaching the federal exemption amount.
2. Conduct Out-of-State Due Diligence: It is imperative to inventory a client’s assets to identify any property held in states that still impose their own estate or inheritance taxes, as these can create unexpected liabilities.
3. Prioritize Capital Gains Planning: The “step-up in basis” is one of the most valuable tax benefits available at death. Securing and documenting accurate valuations of assets as of the date of death is a critical service that can save heirs significant tax liability in the future.
4. Educate Clients: Professionals have an ongoing duty to correct the common misperception that “all death taxes are gone.” Clarifying the distinction between the repealed state tax and the enduring federal tax is essential for responsible planning.

On a broader policy level, the Indiana experience demonstrates how a tax, once established, can become misaligned with changing economic realities.

It also shows how a focused, multi-faceted argument that combines data-driven economic analysis with powerful personal stories of hardship can successfully drive profound policy change.

The swift legislative pivot from a cautious 10-year phase-out to an immediate, full repeal serves as a potent reminder of how quickly long-standing political and fiscal logjams can break when political will, public sentiment, and economic opportunity finally align.

The death of the Indiana death tax was not just the end of a revenue stream; it was the end of an era in Indiana’s fiscal history.

Works cited

1. History of the Inheritance Tax Law of Indiana and Resume of …, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5171&context=ilj
2. IARA: Inheritance Tax Records – IN.gov, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.in.gov/iara/from-the-vault-blog/inheritance-tax-records/
3. The Phase Out of Indiana Inheritance Tax – CGG Law Firm, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.cgglawfirm.com/news/the-phase-out-of-indiana-inheritance-tax/
4. Indiana Inheritance Tax Explained 2025 – Valur Library, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://learn.valur.com/indiana-inheritance-tax/
5. Repeal of Indiana Inheritance Tax | Law Bulletins – Taft Law, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.taftlaw.com/news-events/law-bulletins/repeal-of-indiana-inheritance-tax/
6. Indiana Inheritance Taxes: Are Now Gone! – Purdue Agriculture, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://ag.purdue.edu/commercialag/home/paer-article/indiana-inheritance-taxes-are-now-gone/
7. Should Indiana phase out inheritance tax? – Indianapolis Business Journal, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.ibj.com/articles/32172-should-indiana-phase-out-inheritance-tax
8. Dom Gosheff Explains Impact of Indiana Inheritance Tax Phase-Out on Succession Planning | Publications | Insights | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.faegredrinker.com/en/insights/publications/2012/4/dom-gosheff-explains-impact-of-indiana-inheritance-tax-phaseout-on-succession-planning
9. Instructions for Completing Indiana Inheritance Tax Return for Nonresident Decedent, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://co.johnson.in.us/egov/documents/1628712727_51569.pdf
10. Repeal of the Inheritance Tax, Estate Tax, and Generation Skipping Tax – Indiana, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.in.gov/dor/files/dn44.pdf
11. FAQs • What is Indiana Estate Tax? – Hamilton County, IN, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://hamiltoncounty.in.gov/FAQ.aspx?QID=121
12. How Probate Works in Indiana | UIndy – University of Indianapolis, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://uindy.edu/business/maple-how-probate-works-in-indiana
13. Do I Pay Taxes on an Inheritance? – Frank & Kraft, Attorneys at Law, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://frankkraft.com/do-i-pay-taxes-on-an-inheritance/
14. INDIANA REPEALS INHERITANCE TAX | Hall Render, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.hallrender.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Indiana_Repeals_Inheritance_Tax_Memo.pdf
15. Indiana Inheritance Tax: Repealed – Nolo, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/indiana-inheritance-tax.html
16. Indiana Inheritance Tax – Kosciusko County, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.kosciusko.in.gov/egov/apps/document/center.egov?view=item&id=554
17. Inheritance Tax – Greene County, Indiana, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.co.greene.in.us/topic/index.php?topicid=116&structureid=11
18. Indiana Inheritance Tax Repeal (Actually a Phase Out) – Like Law Group, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://likelawgroup.com/2012/03/23/indiana-inheritance-tax-repeal-actually-a-phase-out/
19. Change in Indiana Inheritance Tax Law, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://kddk.com/2012/06/20/change-in-indiana-inheritance-tax-law/
20. Repeal of Indiana inheritance tax will aid some farm beneficiaries – Purdue University, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2013/Q2/repeal-of-indiana-inheritance-tax-will-aid-some-farm-beneficiaries.html
21. Indiana Code § 6-4.1-5-1. Tax Rates; Transfers to Classes A, B, and …, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-4-1/chapter-5/section-6-4-1-5-1/
22. Back from the Dead: State Estate Taxes After the Fiscal Cliff – Urban Institute, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/26196/412694-Back-from-the-Dead-State-Estate-Taxes-After-the-Fiscal-Cliff.PDF
23. How much is Inheritance Tax?, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://southindylaw.com/how-much-is-indiana-inheritance-tax/
24. THE REPEAL OF INDIANA’S INHERITANCE TAX | Allen Wellman Harvey Keyes Cooley, LLP, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.awmlaw.com/articles-by-our-attorneys/estate-planning-articles/the-repeal-of-indianas-inheritance-tax/
25. Paul Kraft Weighs in on End of Indiana Inheritance Tax, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://frankkraft.com/paul-kraft-weighs-indiana-inheritance-tax/
26. weekly farm newspaper source for ag news … – Farm World, accessed on August 8, 2025, http://www.farmworldonline.com/News/ArchiveArticle.asp?newsid=8379
27. Estate Planning for Farmers: 5 Proven Steps for Stress-Free 2025, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.dwlslaw.com/practice-areas/business-law/agriculture-lawyer/estate-planning-for-farmers/
28. Instructions for Completing Indiana Inheritance Tax Return, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://co.johnson.in.us/egov/documents/1628712169_84767.pdf
29. Legislation to Ease Estate Tax Burden on Farmers – Inside INdiana Business, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.insideindianabusiness.com/articles/legislation-to-ease-estate-tax-burden-on-farmers
30. Charitable Gifting in Your Indiana Estate Plan – Frank & Kraft, Attorneys at Law, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://frankkraft.com/resources/frequently-asked-questions/charitable-gifting-in-your-indiana-estate-plan/
31. Estate and Gift Tax FAQ – Indiana State Medical Association EAP | Anthem, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.anthemeap.com/isma/find-legal-support/resources/estate-law/legal-assist/estate-and-gift-tax-faq
32. The “Transfer Intended” Clause in Indiana Inheritance Tax – Digital Repository @ Maurer Law, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3113&context=ilj
33. Indiana Inheritance Tax: Is Your Inheritance at Risk? – Frank & Kraft, Attorneys at Law, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://frankkraft.com/indiana-inheritance-tax-inheritance-risk/
34. Wealth transfer strategies – Inside INdiana Business, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.insideindianabusiness.com/articles/wealth-transfer-strategies
35. Farm Succession Planning: Your Complete Guide, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.fbfs.com/learning-center/what-you-need-to-know-about-farm-succession-planning
36. Estate Planning for Farm Families – Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://dyson.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2022/04/Cornell_EstatePlanningGuide2021_e.pdf-VD.pdf
37. Estate Planning Basics for Farmers – Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.calt.iastate.edu/estate-planning-basics-farmers
38. [r32] Inheritance tax bill makes its way through the General Assembly (2/29/2012) | State of Indiana House of Representatives, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.indianahouserepublicans.com/news/press-releases/r32-inheritance-tax-bill-makes-its-way-through-the-general-assembly-2-29-2012/
39. [r58] Highlights from the 2012 legislative session (3/16/2012) | State …, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.indianahouserepublicans.com/news/press-releases/r58-highlights-from-the-2012-legislative-session-3-16-2012/
40. [r29] Column: A history of tax cuts (3/11/2013) | State of Indiana House of Representatives, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.indianahouserepublicans.com/news/press-releases/r29-column-a-history-of-tax-cuts-3-11-2013/
41. 2013: A Year in Review – Indiana Senate Republicans, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.indianasenaterepublicans.com/2013-a-year-in-review
42. Inheritance Tax – Indy.gov, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.indy.gov/activity/inheritance-tax
43. PROBATE CODE STUDY COMMISSION – IN.gov, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://archive.iga.in.gov/2013/interim/minutes/PCSCGA8.pdf
44. Repeal of Indiana’s Inheritance Tax – IN.gov, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.kosciusko.in.gov/egov/apps/document/center.egov?view=item&id=655
45. Inheritance Tax Information / Johnson County, Indiana, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://co.johnson.in.us/topic/index.php?topicid=11&structureid=14
46. Inheritance Tax / Dearborn County, Indiana, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.dearborncounty.org/topic/index.php?topicid=21&structureid=14
47. Not for Public Access* – TaxFormFinder, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.taxformfinder.org/forms/2024/2024-indiana-form-ih-14.pdf
48. 45 13-330 | IARP – Indiana Administrative Code, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://iar.iga.in.gov/register/20130731-IR-045130330NRA
49. A Guide to the Federal Estate Tax for 2025 – SmartAsset.com, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://smartasset.com/taxes/all-about-the-estate-tax
50. Estate and Inheritance Taxes Archives – Tax Foundation, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://taxfoundation.org/datamaps/state-estate-inheritance-taxes/