The Ghost Tax and the Golden Handcuffs: A California Estate Planner’s Journey Through Real Estate, Inheritance, and a $600,000 Mistake

Introduction: The Case That Changed Everything

Fifteen years in estate planning is a long time.

It’s long enough to see well-intentioned plans succeed beautifully and, unfortunately, long enough to see seemingly simple mistakes blossom into financial catastrophes.

For me, the case that defined my career and reshaped my entire understanding of California real estate and inheritance came in my third year of practice.

It was the story of the Chen family.

Mr. and Mrs. Chen were a delightful couple who had bought a modest home in La Jolla in the 1980s.

They had worked hard, paid it off, and now, in their retirement, were consumed by a single, paralyzing fear: the “death tax.” They had heard stories from friends and read articles about the government swooping in to take a massive chunk of an inheritance.

They were determined this would not happen to their only daughter, Sarah.

They came to my office with a simple request: give the house to Sarah now, while they were alive, to avoid the tax.

At the time, I was a young planner, focused on executing my clients’ stated wishes.

I drew up the paperwork, facilitated the gift transfer, and believed I had done my job.

Years later, the disaster unfolded.

Sarah, needing to relocate for a new job, sold the home.

The subsequent tax bill was staggering—a life-altering sum that I had unknowingly helped create.

The Chens’ fear was real, but it was misplaced.

The real danger wasn’t the “California Inheritance Tax”—a tax that, as you will learn, does not exist.¹

The true threat was a combination of other, far more complex and costly taxes they never saw coming.

This guide is the culmination of a 15-year journey to understand and master these real threats, a journey that began with that single, costly mistake.

It is my hope that by sharing this journey, from myth to mastery, I can provide a clear path for California families to navigate this landscape and protect their own legacies.

Part I: Chasing Ghosts – My Early Years and the Specter of the “Death Tax”

In the early 2000s, my practice was dominated by conversations about the “death tax.” Clients, much like the Chens, were driven by a fear of this looming financial grim reaper.

My initial focus was on addressing this fear directly, but I soon realized that the most important part of my job wasn’t solving the problem they presented, but first convincing them they were fighting the wrong battle.

The public’s fear of a non-existent “inheritance tax” is a primary driver of poor estate planning decisions.

This fear acts as a cognitive shortcut, causing people to focus on the wrong problem and seek the wrong solutions, often leading to catastrophic financial outcomes.

The Myth of the California Inheritance Tax

The first and most important lesson for any Californian is this: California does not have an inheritance tax. It also does not have a state-level estate tax.³

This statement is often met with disbelief, so it’s important to understand the terms.

An

inheritance tax is a tax paid by the person who receives the property or money (the beneficiary).²

An

estate tax, by contrast, is paid by the estate of the deceased person before any assets are distributed to the heirs.³

California has neither.

This fear is a ghost, a remnant of a bygone era.

California did have a state estate tax for many years, but it was structured as a “pick-up tax,” meaning it was equal to a credit the federal government allowed for state death taxes.

When the federal government eliminated that credit, California’s estate tax effectively vanished for anyone dying after December 31, 2004.³

The idea persists, however, partly because it remains a recurring political topic.

In 2019, a bill known as S.B.

378 was introduced in the California legislature to create a new state estate tax, though it ultimately failed to pass.³

This shows that while the threat is not current, the political winds can shift, justifying vigilance but not panic.

The Federal Estate Tax: A Concern for the 0.1%

While California has no estate tax, the federal government does.

However, for the vast majority of families, this is another ghost.

The federal estate tax only applies to estates with a value exceeding a very high threshold.

For 2024, that exemption is $13.61 million for an individual.²

For a married couple, this protection is even greater.

Through a provision called “portability,” a surviving spouse can use any unused portion of the deceased spouse’s exemption.

This means a married couple can effectively shield nearly $28 million from federal estate taxes.²

This renders the federal estate tax irrelevant for over 99% of American families.

It is a tax on the ultra-wealthy, not the typical California homeowner, even in our state’s high-value real estate market.

There is, however, a critical nuance that requires professional attention: the current high exemption amount is not permanent.

Under current law, it is scheduled to be cut roughly in half on January 1, 2026, if Congress does not act to extend it.⁶

This “sunset” provision highlights the dynamic nature of tax law and reinforces the need for ongoing, professional estate planning.

The First Real Monster: The California Probate Process

After dispelling the myths of inheritance and estate taxes, I could finally turn my clients’ attention to the first tangible, and often costly, monster they would face: probate.

Probate is the court-supervised legal process for settling a deceased person’s estate.¹⁰

If you die in California with assets like a house or bank account titled in your name alone, your family will likely be forced into this process.

It is notoriously public, expensive, and slow.

The timeline alone can be a significant burden on a grieving family.

A standard probate case in California typically takes anywhere from 9 to 18 months to complete, and it is not uncommon for complex cases or those in backlogged courts to take years.³

The process involves mandatory waiting periods for creditors to file claims, court hearings, and detailed paperwork, all of which contribute to the delay.¹¹

The financial cost of probate is what truly shocks most families.

In California, the fees for the estate’s personal representative (the executor) and their attorney are set by law.

These “statutory fees” are calculated as a percentage of the gross value of the estate assets.¹³

This is a critical point: the value is based on the fair market value of the assets without subtracting mortgages or other debts.

A $1.5 million home with a $1 million mortgage is valued for fee purposes at $1.5 million.

Both the executor and the attorney are entitled to a fee based on this value, effectively doubling the cost.

Table 1: The High Cost of Dying in Public: California’s Statutory Probate Fees

Estate’s Gross Value	Fee on this Portion	Cumulative Fee (per representative)	Total Statutory Fee (Executor + Attorney)
$100,000	4%	$4,000	$8,000
$500,000	4% on first $100k, 3% on next $100k, 2% on next $300k	$13,000	$26,000
$1,000,000	4% on first $100k, 3% on next $100k, 2% on next $800k	$23,000	$46,000
$2,000,000	Fee on first $1M is $23k, 1% on next $1M	$33,000	$66,000
$5,000,000	Fee on first $1M is $23k, 1% on next $4M	$63,000	$126,000

Note: Fees are based on the statutory schedule in California Probate Code §10810.¹²

This table does not include additional costs like court filing fees, appraisal fees, publication costs, and potential “extraordinary fees” for complex work, which can add thousands more to the total expense.¹⁰

This is the real, non-negotiable “death tax” for those who fail to plan.

The money comes directly out of the inheritance meant for the family.

It was this reality that I began to emphasize with my clients.

We were no longer chasing ghosts; we were fighting a very real and expensive monster.

Part II: The Epiphany – A $600,000 Lesson in Capital Gains

The story of the Chen family didn’t end with the gift of their home to their daughter, Sarah.

The true lesson, the one that became the cornerstone of my practice, came years later when Sarah called me in a panic.

She had sold the house, and her accountant had just delivered devastating news.

This was my professional epiphany—the moment I realized that the most dangerous threat to my clients’ wealth wasn’t the tax they feared, but the one they had never even heard of.

The Gifting Trap: The Chens’ Story Revisited

To understand the disaster, you need to see the numbers.

The Chens had purchased their La Jolla home in 1985 for $200,000.

In the early 2000s, when they gifted it to Sarah to avoid the “death tax,” the home’s fair market value was around $800,000.

Fast forward to 2023.

Sarah’s career required her to move across the country, so she sold the beloved family home for its current market value of $1.5 million.

Here is where the gifting trap snapped shut.

When Sarah received the house as a gift, she also received her parents’ original purchase price as her “cost basis” for tax purposes.

This is known as a “carryover basis”.¹⁵

While her parents had a beautiful, paid-off home, from a tax perspective, they had gifted her a massive, embedded tax liability.

The calculation her accountant performed was brutal and correct.

• Sale Price: $1,500,000
• Cost Basis (carried over from her parents): $200,000
• Taxable Capital Gain: $1,300,000

Even after using her personal $250,000 primary residence exclusion, Sarah was left with a taxable gain of over $1 million.

The combined federal and California capital gains taxes on that profit amounted to nearly $600,000.

In their effort to dodge a ghost tax, the Chens had led their daughter straight into the path of a real one, and I had held the map.

Unmasking the True Villain: Capital Gains Tax

The villain of this story is the capital gains tax.

It is simply a tax on the profit you make when you sell an asset for more than you paid for it.¹⁸

The key to understanding this tax lies in the concept of “basis.”

Basis is the starting point for calculating your profit.²⁰

For an asset you buy, the basis is usually the purchase price.

As the Chens’ story tragically illustrates, for an asset you receive as a gift, the basis is typically the donor’s original basis.¹⁷

The lower your basis, the higher your potential taxable gain.

This distinction is the pivot point upon which entire family fortunes can turn.

The Hero’s Arrival: Understanding the “Step-Up in Basis”

My epiphany came when I re-ran the Chens’ scenario, but with one crucial change: what if they had done nothing? What if they had ignored their fear of the ghost tax and simply held onto their home, allowing Sarah to inherit it after they passed away? The outcome would have been miraculously different, thanks to a provision in the tax code that I now refer to as the “magic eraser” of estate planning.

Under Internal Revenue Code §1014, when a person dies, the assets in their estate receive what is called a “step-up in basis”.²³

This rule adjusts the cost basis of an inherited asset from its original purchase price to its fair market value on the date of the owner’s death.⁴

It effectively erases the taxable capital gain that accumulated during the deceased owner’s lifetime.

Let’s look at the Chens’ alternate reality:

1. Mr. and Mrs. Chen pass away when their home is worth $1.5 million.
2. Sarah inherits the home.
3. Under IRC §1014, the home’s cost basis is “stepped up” from the original $200,000 to the date-of-death value of $1.5 million.²⁶
4. Sarah then sells the home for $1.5 million.
5. The calculation is now: Sale Price ($1.5M) – Stepped-Up Basis ($1.5M) = Taxable Capital Gain ($0).

The $600,000 tax bill vanishes completely.

By doing nothing, by simply allowing the property to pass through inheritance, they would have achieved the perfect tax outcome.

This revelation was profound.

The step-up in basis is the single most important tax provision for the intergenerational transfer of wealth for most families in high-appreciation areas like California.

Its preservation is far more impactful than the federal estate tax for 99% of the population.

This benefit applies to most capital assets, such as real estate, stocks, and business interests.

It is crucial to note, however, that it does not apply to tax-deferred retirement accounts like IRAs and 401(k)s.

Those assets are passed to heirs with their tax liability intact and are taxed as ordinary income upon withdrawal.²⁴

Part III: The Planner’s Toolkit – Strategies for a Tax-Proof Legacy

Armed with the painful lessons from the Chen family and the powerful knowledge of the step-up in basis, my approach to estate planning transformed.

The goal was no longer just about avoiding the probate monster, but about building a comprehensive fortress that could defend a family’s legacy against all real threats.

This required a specific set of tools, deployed with precision.

The Foundational Tool: The Revocable Living Trust

The first and most essential tool in any California estate planner’s toolkit is the Revocable Living Trust.

Its primary and most well-known benefit is that it allows an estate to avoid the costly and time-consuming probate process described earlier.²⁷

The mechanics are straightforward: you create a trust document and then transfer the legal title of your assets—your house, your bank accounts, your investments—from your individual name into the name of the trust.¹⁴

Since you no longer technically own the assets in your own name at your death, there is nothing for the probate court to administer.

However, the trust’s most vital, and often misunderstood, feature is its interaction with the step-up in basis.

A common fear is that putting assets into a trust might forfeit this critical tax benefit.

The opposite is true.

For tax purposes, a revocable living trust is considered a “disregarded entity” during the grantor’s lifetime.

This means the IRS treats the assets as if you still own them directly.²⁶

Because the assets are still included in your taxable estate at death, they receive a

full step-up in basis just as they would if they were passed through a will.¹⁹

The Revocable Living Trust is therefore the perfect foundational tool: it solves the probate problem without creating a capital gains tax problem.

It also provides the added benefits of privacy—unlike a will, a trust is a private document that isn’t filed with the court—and control, allowing your chosen successor trustee to manage and distribute your assets according to your precise instructions without court interference.²⁷

The California Superpower: Community Property and the “Double Step-Up”

For married couples, California law provides an additional, powerful advantage.

California is a “community property” state, which generally means that assets acquired during a marriage are considered to be owned equally by both spouses.³¹

This legal status has a profound impact on the step-up in basis.

In the 41 “common law” states, when one spouse dies, only the deceased spouse’s 50% interest in a jointly owned asset receives a step-up in basis.

The surviving spouse’s 50% interest retains its original, low basis.²³

But in a community property state like California, when the first spouse dies,

both halves of the community property asset get a full step-up to the fair market value at the date of death.¹⁵

This is a massive tax advantage.

This leads to a phenomenon I call the “double step-up.” Consider a success story: Mark and Susan buy a home as community property for $400,000.

Mark passes away when the home is worth $1 million.

In a common-law state, Susan’s new basis would be $700,000 (her original $200,000 half plus Mark’s stepped-up $500,000 half).

But in California, the entire property gets a step-up, so Susan’s new basis is the full $1 million.

Years later, Susan passes away when the home is worth $1.8 million.

Their children inherit the home, and the basis is stepped up again to $1.8 million.³²

All of the appreciation that occurred during both Mark’s and Susan’s lifetimes is completely wiped away for tax purposes.

To secure this benefit, it is critical that married couples hold title to their property correctly, such as “Community Property with Right of Survivorship”.³⁴

A Tale of Two Transfers: A Definitive Comparison

The choice between gifting an asset during life and allowing it to be inherited at death is the critical decision point for any California property owner.

The tax consequences are not just different; they are polar opposites.

The following table distills this crucial choice into a clear, side-by-side comparison.

Table 2: Gifting vs. Inheriting a California Home – A Tale of Two Tax Bills

Feature	Scenario 1: Gift During Life	Scenario 2: Inherit at Death
The Setup	Home bought for $200k. Gifted to child when worth $1M. Child sells when worth $1.5M.	Home bought for $200k. Parents die when home is worth $1.5M. Child inherits and sells for $1.5M.
Recipient’s Cost Basis	$200,000 (Carryover Basis from parents) 15	$1,500,000 (Stepped-Up Basis to date-of-death value) 25
Capital Gain on Sale	$1,300,000 ($1.5M Sale Price – $200k Basis)	$0 ($1.5M Sale Price – $1.5M Basis)
Estimated Tax Bill	~$600,000 (After primary residence exclusion)	$0
Property Tax Impact	Reassessment may be triggered at time of gift.	Reassessment triggered at death, subject to Prop 19 rules.

Note: Tax calculation is an estimate based on combined federal and California long-term capital gains rates for a high-income individual and is for illustrative purposes only.

The fundamental principle—a massive tax bill for gifting versus no tax for inheriting—is the key takeaway.²³

This table represents the core lesson of my fifteen-year journey.

The path that seems simplest and most intuitive—giving a gift—is often the most destructive.

The path that requires patience and planning—inheriting through a trust—is the one that preserves wealth.

Part IV: The Modern Minefield – Navigating Proposition 19

Just when the path seemed clear—avoid probate with a trust, preserve the step-up in basis by inheriting—the landscape shifted dramatically.

In November 2020, California voters passed Proposition 19, a constitutional amendment that upended decades of property tax planning and created a new, complex minefield for families.

It has created a fundamental conflict between two core estate planning goals: minimizing capital gains tax and minimizing property tax.

A strategy that optimizes for one can now be detrimental to the other, forcing families into difficult, often zero-sum choices.

The Old World: The Generous Parent-Child Exclusion (Pre-Feb 16, 2021)

For over 30 years, California law, under Propositions 58 and 193, provided a powerful property tax benefit for intergenerational transfers.

Under these old rules, parents could transfer their primary residence (of any value) to their children without triggering a property tax reassessment.

Furthermore, they could transfer up to $1 million of the assessed value of other properties, like vacation homes or rentals, with the same protection.³⁶

This allowed children to inherit their parents’ low Proposition 13 tax base, saving them potentially tens of thousands of dollars in property taxes each year.

The New Reality: How Prop 19 Changed the Game

Effective February 16, 2021, Proposition 19 severely curtailed this benefit.³⁹

The new rules are far more restrictive:

1. Strict Primary Residence Requirement: The property tax exclusion is now limited only to the transfer of the parent’s primary residence, and the child who inherits it must move into the home and claim it as their own primary residence within one year of the transfer.⁴¹ If the child intends to use it as a vacation home or a rental, the property will be fully reassessed to its current market value.
2. Elimination of the “Other Property” Exclusion: The generous $1 million exclusion for properties other than the primary residence is completely gone.³⁷ All investment properties, vacation homes, and commercial buildings are now fully reassessed to market value when transferred between parents and children.
3. A New Value Cap: Even if a child inherits a primary residence and moves into it, the full tax benefit is not guaranteed. The child can keep the parent’s low assessed value only if the home’s fair market value at the time of transfer is not more than the parent’s assessed value plus $1 million. If the market value exceeds this threshold, a partial reassessment occurs.³⁷ For example, if a home has an assessed value of $400,000 and a market value of $2 million, the new assessed value for the child would be $1 million ($400,000 original assessed value + [$2,000,000 market value – ($400,000 assessed value + $1,000,000)]).

The Two-Tax Dilemma: A Modern Case Study

This brings us to the modern planner’s challenge, illustrated by the Rodriguez family.

They did everything right according to the old playbook.

They have a well-funded revocable living trust to avoid probate.

Their plan ensures their two children will inherit their Palo Alto home (purchased for $300,000, assessed value $400,000, current market value $3 million) and receive a full step-up in basis to $3 million, perfectly solving the capital gains tax problem.

But here is the Prop 19 trap: neither of their children, a teacher and a social worker, can afford to live in Palo Alto.

Because they cannot make the home their primary residence, the parent-child exclusion does not apply.

Upon inheriting the home, its property tax basis will be reassessed from the parents’ low $400,000 assessed value to the current $3 million market value.

The annual property tax bill will skyrocket from approximately $4,400 to over $33,000.³⁸

The children are now caught in what I call the “Golden Handcuffs.” They have inherited a $3 million asset free of capital gains tax, but they cannot afford the annual carrying costs.

Prop 19 forces them to sell a cherished family home they might have wanted to keep as a long-term investment.

This is the new dilemma: you can plan perfectly to avoid one tax, only to be trapped by another.

Table 3: The Parent-Child Exclusion – Before and After Proposition 19

Feature	Rule Before Feb 16, 2021 (Prop 58/193)	Rule After Feb 15, 2021 (Prop 19)
Transfer of Primary Residence	Assessed value fully transferable.	Transferable only if child makes it their primary residence.
Value Limit on Primary Residence	No limit on market value.	Parent’s assessed value + $1M. Partial reassessment above this limit.
Transfer of Other Property (e.g., Rental Home)	Allowed.	Eliminated. Full reassessment to market value.
Value Limit on Other Property	Up to $1 million of assessed value.	N/A – Benefit is eliminated.

Source: This table synthesizes the rule changes detailed by the California State Board of Equalization and various county assessor offices.³⁹

Conclusion: The Ongoing Journey – A Legacy of Clarity and Confidence

The journey from the Chens’ simple but costly mistake to the Rodriguez family’s complex modern dilemma encapsulates the evolution of estate planning in California.

The landscape is not static; it is a dynamic environment of shifting laws and economic conditions.

The planner’s job is no longer just to provide a set of documents, but to provide clarity in the face of complexity.

The goal is to empower families to move beyond fear and make proactive, informed decisions.

Reflecting on this journey, the core lessons have become crystal clear:

1. The California Inheritance Tax is a ghost. Do not let fear of a non-existent tax drive your decisions. The state has no inheritance or estate tax.¹
2. The real monsters are probate, capital gains tax, and property tax reassessment. These are the tangible threats that can erode a family’s wealth. Probate is a costly and public court process ¹², capital gains tax can claim a huge portion of an asset’s appreciation ¹⁵, and Prop 19 can trigger massive property tax hikes.⁴³
3. The “step-up in basis” is your most powerful shield. For most families, preserving the step-up in basis by allowing heirs to inherit appreciated assets like real estate is the single most effective way to eliminate capital gains tax liability.⁴ Gifting these assets during life is often a catastrophic mistake.
4. A Revocable Living Trust is the foundational tool. It is the most effective way to avoid probate while ensuring that your assets still receive the all-important step-up in basis at death.²⁶
5. Proposition 19 has created a two-tax dilemma. The new rules force a potential conflict between minimizing capital gains tax and minimizing property tax. There is no longer a single “perfect” solution for every family; planning now requires navigating these difficult trade-offs.

Ultimately, building a durable legacy is not about finding a secret loophole.

It is about understanding the fundamental rules of the road.

By arming themselves with knowledge, California families can confidently navigate the complexities of the system, protect their hard-earned assets, and ensure their legacy provides security, not a tax burden, for the generations to come.

Works cited

1. FAQs • What inheritance taxes or estate taxes will the estat – Merced County, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.countyofmerced.com/FAQ.aspx?QID=434
2. California Estate Tax: Everything You Need to Know – SmartAsset.com, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://smartasset.com/estate-planning/california-estate-tax
3. California Estate Planning & Tax | CunninghamLegal, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.cunninghamlegal.com/new-california-estate-tax-proposed-for-2020/
4. Do Beneficiaries Have to Pay Taxes on Inheritance? – The Grossman Law Firm, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.grossmanlaw.net/do-beneficiaries-have-to-pay-taxes-on-inheritance/
5. Understanding California Estate Tax | Robert Hall & Associates, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.roberthalltaxes.com/news/understanding-california-estate-tax/
6. Understanding Estate Tax in California | CA Inheritance Law – Evolution Tax & Legal, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://evolutiontaxlegal.com/estate-taxes-in-california/
7. Filing Requirements for California Estate Tax Return – State Controller’s Office – CA.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.sco.ca.gov/ardtax_taxinfo_estate_return.html
8. California Estate & Gift Taxes, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/legislation/2019-2020/SB378-032519.pdf
9. California Inheritance Tax: What Residents Need To Know – Define Financial, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.definefinancial.com/blog/california-inheritance-tax-what-residents-need-to-know/
10. Overview of formal probate | California Courts | Self Help Guide, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/probate/formal-probate
11. A Step-by-Step Guide to the Probate Process in California – ClearEstate, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.clearestate.com/en-us/blog/probate-process-california
12. California Probate Fees Explained – Keystone Law, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://keystone-law.com/california-probate-fees
13. What Everyone Should Know About the Cost of Probate – Sheela Stark Law Group, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://lawyerstark.com/blog/what-everyone-should-know-about-the-cost-of-probate/
14. How a Revocable Trust in California Helps Avoid Probate, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.ceb.com/how-a-revocable-trust-in-california-helps-avoid-probate/
15. Step Up in Basis at Death: Essential Guide for Inherited Assets – Massey and Company CPA, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://masseyandcompanycpa.com/step-up-in-basis-at-death-essential-guide-for-inherited-assets/
16. Estate Planning: Learn How the ‘Step-Up Basis’ Tax Rules Work and Reduce Taxes on Capital Gains – The Goralka Law Firm, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.goralkalawfirm.com/blog/estate-planning-learn-how-the-step-up-basis-tax-rules-work-and-reduce-taxes-on-capital-gains-gor.cfm
17. Gifting Real Estate to Children | Stimmel Law, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/gifting-real-estate-children
18. Step-Up In Basis | TaxEDU Glossary – Tax Foundation, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://taxfoundation.org/taxedu/glossary/step-up-in-basis/
19. Do Assets in a Living Trust Get a Step-Up in Basis?., accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.attorneyoffice.com/assets-living-trust-stepup-basis-2/
20. www.geigerlawoffice.com, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.geigerlawoffice.com/blog/understanding-step-up-in-basis-for-assets-upon-inheritance.cfm#:~:text=In%20some%20situations%2C%20when%20you,of%20the%20original%20owner’s%20death.
21. www.corcoransmithlaw.com, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.corcoransmithlaw.com/california-step-up-in-basis-avoiding-costly-capital-gains-taxes#:~:text=Normally%2C%20an%20asset%20is%20calculated,rather%20than%20the%20original%20cost.
22. Inheriting Vs. Gifting – Is The Inheritance Worth The Wait? – Wiebe Hinton Hambalek, LLP, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://whhcpas.com/inheriting-property-vs-gifting/
23. What is step-in basis and how can it affect me? – Fidelity Investments, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/what-is-step-up-in-basis
24. Trusts and the Step-Up in Basis: What You Really Need to Know in California, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.jamesburnslaw.com/trusts-and-the-step-up-in-basis-what-you-really-need-to-know-in-california
25. Understanding Step-Up in Basis for Assets Upon Inheritance | Geiger Law Office, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.geigerlawoffice.com/blog/understanding-step-up-in-basis-for-assets-upon-inheritance.cfm
26. Does Property Held in a Revocable Living Trust Receive a Step-Up In Basis When Inherited, Similar To Property Passed Directly To Children Upon a Parent’s Death? | Business Law Group, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.lawgroup.biz/does-property-held-in-a-revocable-living-trust-receive-a-step-up-in-basis-when-inherited-similar-to-property-passed-directly-to-children-upon-a-parent-s-death
27. Living Trust Los Angeles | Avoid Probate in California – Law Office of Mitchell A. Port, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.askmyattorney.net/blog/2025/may/living-trusts-in-california-what-they-are-and-wh/
28. How Does a Revocable Trust Avoid Probate?, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.actec.org/resource-center/video/how-does-a-revocable-trust-avoid-probate/
29. Can a Trust Help My Family Avoid Probate in California? – Attorney, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.davidschechetlaw.com/california-estate-planning-attorney/can-a-trust-help-my-family-avoid-probate-in-california
30. California Revocable Living Trust (Your New Ultimate Guide In 2025) | Opelon LLP- A Trust, Estate Planning And Probate Law Firm, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://opelon.com/california-revocable-living-trust/
31. What Happens to Your Home After Death in California: Taxes, Capital Gains, and the Step-Up in Basis Explained – Law Office of James Burns, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.jamesburnslaw.com/what-happens-to-your-home-after-death-in-california-taxes-capital-gains-and-the-step-up-in-basis-explained
32. Community Property and Estate Planning | The Law Firm of Kavesh …, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.kaveshlaw.com/library/community-property-and-estate-planning.cfm
33. Step-Up in Basis: Definition and How It Works for Inherited Property – Investopedia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stepupinbasis.asp
34. California Step-up In Basis: Avoiding Costly Capital Gains Taxes, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.corcoransmithlaw.com/california-step-up-in-basis-avoiding-costly-capital-gains-taxes
35. Prop 19 and how it impacts inherited property for California residents – Financial Alternatives, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.financialalternatives.com/financial-alternatives-inc/2021/1/25/prop-19-and-how-it-impacts-inherited-property-for-california-residents
36. Parent & Child and/or Grandparent-Grandchild Reassessment Exclusion, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://smcacre.gov/assessor/parent-child-andor-grandparent-grandchild-reassessment-exclusion
37. California Proposition 19’s Impact on Estate Planning and Gifting of Real Property, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.fennemorelaw.com/california-proposition-19s-impact-on-estate-planning-and-gifting-of-real-property-2/
38. Prop 19 – Beware of Property Tax Reassessments – California Lawyers Association, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://calawyers.org/real-property-law/prop-19-beware-of-property-tax-reassessments/
39. Transfers of Property Between Parents and Children: Prop 19 Information, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.santacruzcountyca.gov/Departments/ClerkoftheBoard/AssessmentAppealsBoard/Prop19Information.aspx
40. Proposition 19 | San Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder & Elections – ACRE, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://smcacre.gov/assessor/proposition-19
41. Proposition 19 Fact Sheet – California State Board of Equalization, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.boe.ca.gov/pdf/pub801.pdf
42. Exclusions – Proposition 19 – Los Angeles County Assessor, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://assessor.lacounty.gov/exclusions/prop19
43. Inherited Property & Prop 19: A Guide for California Homeowners – – Blacksburg Law, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://blacksburg-law.com/insights/how-does-prop-19-affect-inherited-property-in-trust/
44. Proposition 19 – Alameda County Assessor, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.acassessor.org/proposition-19/
45. Family Transfers (Prop 19) – Ventura County Assessor, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://assessor.venturacounty.gov/tax-savings/exclusions/family-transfers/
46. Proposition 19 – Board of Equalization, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.boe.ca.gov/prop19/
47. Understanding California’s Proposition 19: What Homeowners Need to Know 4 Years Later., accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.jamesburnslaw.com/understanding-california-s-proposition-19-what-homeowners-need-to-know-4-years-later