Navigating the Minnesota Estate Tax: A Definitive Guide to Wealth Preservation

Introduction: Correcting the Course—From Inheritance Tax to Estate Tax

In the complex lexicon of wealth transfer, few terms are as frequently confused as “inheritance tax” and “estate tax.” Many residents of the North Star State inquire about the rules and implications of the Minnesota inheritance tax, a query rooted in a fundamental misconception.

To be unequivocally clear: Minnesota does not levy an inheritance tax.¹

An inheritance tax is a tax paid by the beneficiaries—the individuals who receive assets from a deceased person’s estate.

Instead, Minnesota is one of a minority of states that imposes an estate tax.⁴

This is a critical distinction.

An estate tax is levied directly on the decedent’s estate—the total value of their assets—before any property is distributed to heirs.³

The responsibility for payment falls upon the estate itself, managed by its personal representative or executor.

This report will serve as a definitive guide to understanding and navigating the intricacies of the Minnesota estate tax, a financial reality with significant implications for wealth preservation.

Embarking on estate planning can feel like being handed a box containing a thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle without a picture on the lid.⁸

The pieces—assets, family dynamics, legal documents, and tax laws—are scattered and seemingly disconnected.

Attempting to force them together without a clear vision leads to frustration, gaps, and an incomplete picture.

The first and most crucial step is to study the “picture on the box top”—to develop a comprehensive understanding of the final goal and the rules that govern how the pieces fit together.¹⁰

This report is designed to provide that picture.

It will deconstruct the complex framework of the Minnesota estate tax, place it in its federal context, illuminate strategic pathways for mitigation, and highlight common pitfalls.

By understanding the complete image, individuals, families, and their advisors can begin to assemble the pieces of their financial legacy with confidence, precision, and purpose.

Part I: The Minnesota Estate Tax: A Comprehensive Framework

This section establishes the foundational rulebook for the Minnesota estate tax.

A thorough grasp of these core mechanics—the definitions, thresholds, rates, and administrative duties—is an absolute prerequisite for any meaningful strategic discussion.

These are the borders and corners of the puzzle, providing the essential structure within which all other planning must occur.

The Lay of the Land: Defining Estate Tax vs. Inheritance Tax

The distinction between these two forms of “death tax” is not merely semantic; it dictates who pays the tax and how it is calculated, fundamentally shaping planning strategies.

• Estate Tax: As implemented in Minnesota, an estate tax is a tax on the transfer of wealth from the deceased. It is calculated based on the net value of the decedent’s entire estate after certain deductions.¹ The estate itself is the legal entity responsible for paying the tax bill to the Minnesota Department of Revenue before the remaining assets are passed on to the designated heirs or beneficiaries.³
• Inheritance Tax: This tax, which Minnesota does not have, is levied on the beneficiaries.¹ The tax liability falls on the person who
  receives the inheritance. The amount of tax owed often varies based on the value of the inheritance and the relationship of the heir to the decedent, with closer relatives typically paying a lower rate or being exempt altogether.² While Minnesotans do not face an inheritance tax from their home state, a resident who inherits property from a decedent living in one of the few states that does impose such a tax (like Kentucky, Nebraska, or Pennsylvania) could be liable for that state’s inheritance tax.¹

The Minnesota Rules of Engagement (2025)

For individuals dying in 2025, the Minnesota estate tax is governed by a specific set of thresholds and rates that have remained consistent for several years.

• The $3 Million Exemption Threshold: Minnesota law provides a generous estate tax exemption, which for deaths occurring from 2020 through 2025, is set at $3,000,000.⁴ This means that if the total value of a decedent’s taxable estate is less than $3 million, it will generally not owe any Minnesota estate tax.¹⁶ This exemption amount, however, is not indexed for inflation and has remained static since 2020, in sharp contrast to the federal exemption which adjusts annually.¹⁸ The static nature of this threshold has profound long-term implications. As asset values—particularly in real estate and investment portfolios—appreciate over time, more and more estates naturally drift above the $3 million mark. An estate valued at $2.7 million in 2020 could easily exceed $3 million by 2025 through normal market growth alone, without the owner acquiring a single new asset. This creates a “bracket creep” phenomenon, where an increasing number of Minnesotans are inadvertently pulled into the estate tax system, transforming what was once considered a tax for the exceptionally wealthy into a more mainstream concern for moderately affluent families, business owners, and farmers. This trend underscores the growing need for proactive planning across a wider segment of the population.
• Calculating the Tax: The Progressive Rate Structure (13% to 16%)
  The tax is not a single, flat rate. For the portion of the estate that exceeds the $3 million exemption, Minnesota applies a progressive, or graduated, rate schedule. The rates begin at 13% and climb to a maximum of 16% for the wealthiest estates.1 The top rate of 16% applies to the portion of a taxable estate that is valued over $10.1 million.14 Understanding this graduated system is key to accurately projecting potential liability.

Table 1: Minnesota Estate Tax Brackets and Rates (2025)

To clarify the calculation, the following table details the marginal tax rates applied to different portions of the taxable estate above the $3 million exemption.

The “taxable estate” in this context refers to the value of the estate after the $3 million exemption has been subtracted.

Taxable Estate*	Base Taxes Paid	Marginal Rate	On the Amount Over
$1 – $7,100,000	$0	13.0%	$0
$7,100,001 – $8,100,000	$923,000	13.6%	$7,100,000
$8,100,001 – $9,100,000	$1,059,000	14.4%	$8,100,000
$9,100,001 – $10,100,000	$1,203,000	15.2%	$9,100,000
$10,100,001 and above	$1,355,000	16.0%	$10,100,000

Source: ¹

*The taxable estate is the total estate value above the $3,000,000 exemption.

For example, consider an estate with a Minnesota taxable value of $4,000,000.

The amount subject to tax is $1,000,000 ($4,000,000 – $3,000,000).

According to the table, this falls into the first bracket.

The tax would be 13% of $1,000,000, resulting in a tax liability of $130,000.

Defining the Minnesota Taxable Estate: What Assets Are Included?

The starting point for the Minnesota estate tax calculation is the “federal gross estate”.²¹

This is an expansive definition that includes the fair market value of nearly all property a person owns or maintains an interest in at the time of death.¹²

The list of included assets is comprehensive ²:

• Real Estate: Homes, cabins, farmland, and other real property.
• Financial Accounts: Bank accounts (checking, savings), brokerage and investment accounts.
• Retirement Plans: The value of IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and other retirement accounts.
• Life Insurance: Proceeds from life insurance policies on the decedent’s life if the decedent owned the policy.
• Business Interests: The value of a sole proprietorship, partnership interests, or shares in a closely held corporation.
• Personal Property: Vehicles, boats, art, jewelry, and other valuable tangible items.
• Trust Assets: Notably, property held within a revocable living trust is included in the gross estate. While such trusts avoid the court process of probate, they do not avoid estate taxes.⁷
• Jointly Owned Property: For assets owned jointly with rights of survivorship (e.g., a house owned by a married couple), generally one-half of the property’s value is included in the estate of the first spouse to die.²⁰

Critical Minnesota-Specific Provisions

Beyond the basic exemption and rates, Minnesota’s tax code contains unique provisions that create significant planning challenges and opportunities.

Two are paramount.

• The Three-Year Gift “Clawback” Rule Explained:
  Minnesota does not have a state-level gift tax, meaning it does not tax gifts made during a person’s lifetime.1 However, to prevent individuals from avoiding the estate tax by simply giving away their assets on their deathbed, the state employs a powerful “clawback” rule.4 Under this provision, the value of any
  federally taxable gifts made within the three years prior to the date of death is added back into the decedent’s estate for the purpose of calculating the Minnesota estate tax.¹³ A “federally taxable gift” is any amount given to a single recipient in one year that exceeds the federal annual gift tax exclusion ($19,000 for 2025).¹⁶ This rule effectively closes a major loophole and makes the timing of large gifts a critical component of Minnesota estate planning.¹⁶
• A Planning Obstacle: The Non-Portability of the Spousal Exemption:
  This is perhaps the most significant divergence from federal law and a major trap for unwary married couples. “Portability” is the ability of a surviving spouse to use the unused portion of their deceased spouse’s estate tax exemption. The federal system allows this.22 Minnesota does not.1 Each Minnesota resident has their own $3 million exemption. If a spouse dies and their exemption is not used (for example, by leaving all assets directly to the surviving spouse, which is a tax-free transfer), that $3 million exemption is lost forever.4 This “use it or lose it” system necessitates a far more structured and deliberate planning approach for married couples in Minnesota to ensure that both spouses’ exemptions are fully utilized, a topic explored in detail in Part IV.

Administrative Obligations: Filing Form M706 and Managing Tax Payments

When a Minnesota resident’s gross estate exceeds the $3 million filing threshold, the personal representative (also known as the executor or administrator) of the estate has a legal duty to file a Minnesota Estate Tax Return, Form M706.⁴

This is required even if no tax is ultimately due after deductions are taken.²⁵

The deadline for filing Form M706 and paying any tax owed is nine months after the decedent’s date of death.⁴

An extension to file may be available, but an extension of time to file is not an extension of time to pay; it is generally expected that at least 90% of the estimated tax is paid by the original due date to avoid penalties and interest.⁶

For estates that face liquidity challenges—for instance, an estate composed primarily of an illiquid family business or farm—it may be possible to arrange for the tax to be paid in installments, but this must be formally requested from the Department of Revenue.⁴

The personal representative is personally responsible for ensuring these obligations are M.T.²⁵

Part II: The Federal Context and the Looming Sunset

The Minnesota estate tax does not exist in a vacuum.

It operates in parallel with a separate federal estate tax system, and the differences between the two are vast.

Understanding this dual landscape is essential, especially given the significant changes to federal law scheduled to take effect in the near future.

This context reveals why many Minnesotans face a state-level tax problem even when they have no federal concerns, and why the window for certain planning strategies is rapidly closing.

A Tale of Two Taxes: A Comparative Analysis

While both systems tax a decedent’s estate, their rules diverge on several critical points, creating a complex compliance and planning environment.

• Exemption Amounts: The most dramatic difference lies in the exemption amounts. For 2025, the federal estate tax exemption is a historic high of $13.99 million per person.⁴ Minnesota’s exemption is a comparatively modest $3 million.¹ This enormous gap creates a specific “Minnesota-only” tax predicament for a large number of estates—those valued between $3 million and $13.99 million. These estates are too small to trigger any federal tax but are squarely in the crosshairs of the Minnesota Department of Revenue.²
• Tax Rates: The top federal estate tax rate is a flat 40% on the taxable amount.²⁰ Minnesota’s system, as detailed previously, is progressive, with marginal rates ranging from 13% to 16%.¹
• Portability: The federal system offers “portability,” a crucial feature for married couples that is completely absent in Minnesota.⁴ This federal advantage allows a surviving spouse to inherit the unused portion of a deceased spouse’s federal exemption, effectively combining them.

Table 2: Minnesota vs. Federal Estate Tax Comparison (2025)

This table provides a clear, at-a-glance summary of the fundamental differences between the two tax regimes, highlighting the key areas where Minnesota-specific planning is required.

Feature	Minnesota	Federal
Exemption Amount (per person)	$3,000,000	$13,990,000
Portability Between Spouses	No	Yes
Top Tax Rate	16% (Progressive)	40% (Flat)
Separate Gift Tax	No	Yes (Unified with Estate Tax)
Gift “Clawback”	Yes (3-year rule for federally taxable gifts)	No (Lifetime gifts reduce exemption)

Sources: ¹

The 2026 “Tax Cliff”: Understanding the Scheduled Reduction

The current, historically high federal exemption is not permanent.

It was established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) and includes a “sunset” provision.²²

On January 1, 2026, unless Congress passes new legislation to extend the current law, the federal exemption amount is scheduled to be cut by more than half.¹⁹

It will revert to its pre-TCJA base of $5 million, adjusted for inflation since that time.

Experts project this will result in a federal exemption somewhere in the range of $6 million to $7 million per person.¹⁸

This impending reduction creates a significant, time-sensitive planning opportunity.

High-net-worth individuals who may be subject to federal estate tax under the lower future exemption have a limited window to utilize the current $13.99 million exemption by making large lifetime gifts before the end of 2025.²³

This “use it or lose it” scenario has made the last few years a critical period for advanced estate planning nationwide.

However, for Minnesota residents, this federal incentive creates a complex strategic dilemma.

While federal law encourages making large gifts now, Minnesota’s three-year clawback rule stands in direct opposition.

A planner might advise a client with a $20 million estate to gift $7 million in 2025 to lock in the high federal exemption.

This is a sound federal strategy.

But if that client were to pass away in 2027 (within three years of the gift), Minnesota law would “claw back” the full $7 million gift into their state taxable estate.

This could trigger a substantial and unexpected Minnesota estate tax liability that would not have existed if the gift hadn’t been made.

This collision of rules forces Minnesota residents and their advisors into a sophisticated risk-reward analysis, weighing the certainty of federal tax savings against the potential for increased state tax liability.

The Portability Advantage: A Federal Perk Minnesota Lacks

Federal portability is a powerful tool for married couples.

When the first spouse dies, if their estate does not use their full federal exemption, the personal representative can file a federal estate tax return (Form 706) to make a “portability election”.²²

This election transfers the deceased spouse’s unused exemption amount (known as the DSUE) to the surviving spouse.²²

The surviving spouse can then add this DSUE to their own exemption, potentially shielding a combined total of up to $27.98 million (in 2025) from federal estate tax.¹

A late portability election can even be made up to five years after the first spouse’s death, providing a generous window to secure this benefit.²²

The complete absence of portability in Minnesota’s system means that such a simple transfer is not possible at the state level.

A Minnesota couple cannot rely on this mechanism to combine their two $3 million exemptions.

This structural difference demands a more active and deliberate approach to estate planning for married couples in Minnesota, often involving the use of trusts to ensure that the exemption of the first spouse to die is not wasted.

Part III: Strategic Playbook for Mitigating the Minnesota Estate Tax

With a firm grasp of the state and federal rules, the focus can now shift from understanding the problem to implementing solutions.

A range of powerful strategies, from foundational gifting techniques to advanced trust structures, can be deployed to minimize or even eliminate the Minnesota estate tax.

The key is to tailor the strategy to the individual’s specific assets, goals, and family situation.

Foundational Strategy: The Power of Proactive Gifting

One of the most direct ways to reduce a future estate tax bill is to reduce the size of the estate itself.

Thoughtful gifting during one’s lifetime is a cornerstone of this approach.

• Leveraging the Annual Gift Tax Exclusion:
  The federal government allows every individual to make gifts up to a certain amount each year to any number of recipients without incurring gift tax or needing to file a gift tax return. For 2025, this “annual exclusion” amount is $19,000 per recipient.1 A married couple can combine their exclusions to gift up to $38,000 per recipient through “gift splitting”.23 This is a remarkably powerful tool in the Minnesota context. Because gifts at or below this annual exclusion amount are not considered “federally taxable gifts,” they are entirely exempt from Minnesota’s three-year clawback rule.20 This allows for the steady, predictable, and safe transfer of wealth out of a taxable estate over time. For example, a couple with three children and five grandchildren could transfer $304,000 ($38,000 x 8) out of their estate each year with no gift or estate tax consequences, significantly eroding a potential tax liability over a decade.
• The Untaxed Gift: Direct Payments for Education and Medical Expenses:
  Beyond the annual exclusion, federal law provides another unlimited gifting opportunity. Payments made directly to a qualified educational institution for tuition expenses or directly to a medical facility or provider for medical care on behalf of another person are not considered taxable gifts, regardless of the amount.22 For instance, a grandparent could pay a grandchild’s $60,000 university tuition directly to the school and, in the same year, give that same grandchild an additional gift of $19,000, all without any tax implications.30 This strategy is exceptionally effective for reducing a large estate while providing meaningful, targeted support to family members.

Advanced Strategy: Architectural Planning with Trusts

For more complex situations or larger estates, trusts provide a sophisticated framework for asset management, protection, and tax mitigation.

They are the architectural blueprints for a durable financial legacy.

• The Tax Shield: Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs)

• Mechanics: An Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) is a specialized, unchangeable trust created for the sole purpose of owning a life insurance policy.³¹ The person whose life is insured, known as the grantor, makes cash gifts to the ILIT. The trustee, who must be someone other than the grantor, then uses this cash to pay the premiums on the life insurance policy owned by the trust.²⁶
• Tax Benefit: The strategic brilliance of the ILIT lies in its ownership structure. Upon the grantor’s death, the life insurance policy pays out its death benefit. However, because the policy was owned by the trust and not by the individual, the proceeds are paid to the trust.³² This means the entire death benefit is excluded from the grantor’s taxable estate for both federal and Minnesota tax purposes.³¹ The ILIT can then provide a substantial pool of tax-free cash. This liquidity is invaluable for paying any estate taxes that may be due, preventing the need for a “fire sale” of cherished but illiquid assets like a family cabin, business, or farm to cover the tax bill.³¹ In Minnesota, ILITs are particularly potent tools for providing the funds to pay the “Minnesota-only” estate tax and for creating a financial resource for a surviving spouse when non-portability limits other options.
• The Philanthropic Tool: Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs)

• Mechanics: A Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT) is an irrevocable trust that serves two purposes simultaneously: providing an income stream to the donor and making a significant gift to charity.³⁷ The donor transfers assets—often highly appreciated property like stocks or real estate—into the CRT.³⁸ The trust then pays an income stream to the donor or other designated non-charitable beneficiaries for a set number of years (not to exceed 20) or for the beneficiaries’ lifetimes.³⁷ At the end of that term, the “remainder” of the assets in the trust are distributed to one or more charities chosen by the donor.³⁷
• Tax Benefit: This structure yields multiple tax advantages. First, the donor receives an immediate partial income tax deduction in the year the trust is funded.³⁷ Second, and most importantly for estate planning, the assets transferred into the CRT are permanently removed from the donor’s taxable estate, thereby reducing or eliminating potential estate tax.⁴⁰ Third, the CRT itself is a tax-exempt entity. This means the trustee can sell the highly appreciated assets without triggering an immediate capital gains tax. This allows the full, pre-tax value of the assets to be reinvested to generate the income stream, a far more efficient outcome than if the donor had sold the assets personally.³⁷

Business & Real Estate Strategy: The Family Limited Partnership (FLP)

For families with significant assets tied up in a business or real estate holdings, the Family Limited Partnership (FLP) offers a sophisticated method for transferring wealth to the next generation while retaining management control and achieving significant tax efficiencies.

• Mechanics: The senior generation (e.g., parents) establishes a limited partnership and transfers assets, such as the family business or a portfolio of real estate, into it.⁴² They structure the partnership with two classes of interests. They retain a small (e.g., 1%) general partner (GP) interest, which holds 100% of the voting and management control. The remaining 99% is held as non-voting limited partner (LP) interests.⁴⁴ The parents then begin a program of gifting these LP interests to their children or trusts for their benefit over time.⁴³
• Tax Benefit: Leveraging Valuation Discounts: The primary tax advantage of an FLP stems from the ability to apply valuation discounts to the gifted LP interests.⁴⁶ Because these interests represent a minority stake with no management control and are not easily sold on an open market (a “lack of marketability”), their fair market value for gift tax purposes is less than their pro-rata share of the underlying assets.⁴² These discounts, which can often range from 30% to 40%, are recognized by the IRS.⁴³ This allows the senior generation to transfer a greater amount of underlying asset value to their heirs each year while staying within their annual gift tax exclusions. In essence, they can leverage their gifts to accelerate the process of reducing their taxable estate, all while maintaining control over the assets as the general partner.⁴²

Specialized Strategy: The Minnesota Qualified Farm & Small Business Deduction

Recognizing the importance of preserving family enterprises, Minnesota law offers a specific and valuable deduction for certain estates.

• The Deduction: The law provides a deduction for the value of qualified small business property and/or qualified farm property.⁴ The total combined value of the general $3 million exemption and this special deduction cannot exceed $5 million.¹³ This effectively allows a qualifying estate to shield up to $5 million from Minnesota estate tax.
• Qualification Criteria: This benefit is not automatic. The property must meet strict criteria. The decedent or their spouse must have owned and participated in the business or farm for at least three years prior to death. Crucially, the heir who inherits the property must continue to materially participate in its operation for three years following the death. Failure to meet this post-death requirement will trigger a “recapture tax,” forcing the heir to pay back the tax savings.¹³

Table 3: Comparison of Advanced Planning Trusts (ILIT vs. CRT vs. FLP)

This table offers a high-level comparison of these three powerful but distinct strategic tools, clarifying their primary functions and ideal applications within a Minnesota estate plan.

Feature	Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT)	Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT)	Family Limited Partnership (FLP)
Primary Goal	Provide tax-free cash (liquidity) to pay estate taxes and other expenses.	Fulfill philanthropic goals while retaining an income stream.	Transfer business/real estate assets to the next generation while retaining control.
Key Tax Benefit	Life insurance death benefit is excluded from the taxable estate.	Removes assets from the taxable estate; provides an income tax deduction.	Allows for valuation discounts on gifted interests, leveraging tax-free gifts.
Grantor Control	Low. The trust is irrevocable, and the grantor cannot be the trustee.	Low. The trust is irrevocable.	High. The grantor acts as the general partner with full management control.
Ideal Assets	Life Insurance Policy.	Highly appreciated assets (stocks, real estate).	Family business, investment real estate.
MN Application	Solves liquidity issues for estates facing the “MN-only” tax and for married couples impacted by non-portability.	Reduces an estate’s value below the $3M threshold for charitably-inclined individuals.	Efficiently transfers high-value Minnesota assets (farms, cabins, businesses) to heirs.

Part IV: Navigating the Nuances: Common Pitfalls and Real-World Scenarios

Translating tax law and planning theory into effective real-world practice requires an awareness of the common mistakes that can derail a plan and an understanding of how these complex rules apply to specific life situations.

This section explores the most frequent errors made in Minnesota estate planning and uses case studies to illustrate the profound impact of these rules.

A recurring theme that emerges from analyzing these pitfalls is a fundamental disconnect between an individual’s intuitive sense of control and the legal reality of ownership.

People often believe a will governs all their assets, that a trust is effective the moment it is signed, or that physically or digitally moving assets out of state severs Minnesota’s ability to tax them.

In each case, this perception is incorrect.

The legal realities—that beneficiary designations override wills, that trusts must be formally funded, and that a resident’s domicile dictates taxability for intangible assets—are what truly determine the outcome.

A primary function of skilled estate planning is to bridge this critical gap between a client’s perceived reality and the legal framework that will actually govern their legacy.

Top 5 Estate Planning Mistakes in Minnesota

1. Ignoring the Minnesota Estate Tax: The most prevalent error is assuming that the high federal exemption (over $13 million) means there are no estate tax concerns. This overlooks Minnesota’s much lower $3 million threshold, leaving many estates unexpectedly exposed to a significant state tax bill.⁴⁸
2. Believing a Will Avoids Probate: This is a persistent and costly misconception. A will is not a tool to avoid probate; it is an instruction manual for the probate court.⁴⁸ Assets titled solely in the decedent’s name are subject to probate. To bypass this public, often lengthy, and potentially expensive court process, one must use other tools like a revocable living trust or ensure assets are passed via beneficiary designations or joint tenancy.⁵⁰
3. Failing to Fund a Trust: Many people go through the process of having an attorney draft a revocable living trust but fail to take the critical next step: re-titling their assets into the name of the trust. An “unfunded” trust is merely an empty legal shell. Assets not formally transferred into the trust will still be subject to probate, defeating one of the primary purposes of creating the trust in the first place.⁴⁸
4. Ignoring Beneficiary Designations: Assets like IRAs, 401(k)s, and life insurance policies are passed to heirs based on the beneficiary designation form on file with the financial institution, not by the terms of a will.⁴⁸ These designations act as “mini-wills” for those specific accounts and legally supersede any conflicting instructions in a formal will. Failing to review and update these forms after major life events like a divorce, death, or birth can lead to assets going to an unintended person, such as an ex-spouse.⁴⁸
5. Failing to Plan for Non-Portability (for Married Couples): A simple “I love you” will, where the first spouse to die leaves all their assets directly to the surviving spouse, is a common approach. While emotionally resonant, it can be a tax disaster in Minnesota. Because transfers to a spouse are tax-free, this plan fails to use any of the deceased spouse’s $3 million Minnesota exemption. That exemption is then permanently lost. The surviving spouse is left with a potentially much larger estate, but only their own $3 million exemption to shield it, leading to a much higher tax bill upon their death.⁴

The Non-Resident’s Dilemma

Minnesota’s estate tax reach extends beyond its residents.

A non-resident who owns real estate (like a family cabin) or tangible personal property (like a boat or valuable art) located within Minnesota at the time of their death may be subject to the Minnesota estate tax.⁴

The tax is not on the full value of the Minnesota property.

Instead, it is calculated proportionally.

The state first determines the tax that

would have been due if the decedent were a Minnesota resident with their entire worldwide estate.

Then, it multiplies that hypothetical tax by a ratio: the value of the Minnesota property divided by the value of the decedent’s total gross estate.⁵³

This ensures that non-residents are only taxed on the portion of their estate that has a clear connection to Minnesota.

Case Study Deep Dive: Estate of Anderson v. Commissioner of Revenue

This 2022 Minnesota Tax Court case provides a crucial clarification on the limits of state tax avoidance strategies and reinforces the paramount importance of a decedent’s domicile.

• Background: The case involved the estate of Jeanette Anderson, a Minnesota resident who passed away in 2018. Her estate was valued at approximately $6.9 million, well above the Minnesota exemption in effect at the time ($2.4 million). However, the vast majority of her assets (about $5.9 million) were held in a revocable trust that was administered in South Dakota, a state with no estate tax.⁵³
• The Argument: The estate’s representatives argued that Minnesota’s estate tax was unconstitutional as applied to them. Their logic was that if the out-of-state assets were excluded from the calculation, the remaining Minnesota-based assets ($1 million) would fall comfortably below the exemption threshold, and no tax would be due. They contended that by including the value of the South Dakota trust in the initial calculation, Minnesota was effectively taxing out-of-state property in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Constitution.⁵³
• The Ruling: The Minnesota Tax Court decisively rejected the estate’s argument.⁵³ The court affirmed the state’s methodology: for a Minnesota resident, the tax calculation begins with the value of the decedent’s
  entire worldwide estate, regardless of where intangible assets like stocks, bonds, or trust accounts are held. The court emphasized that the state’s use of an apportionment formula for non-resident tangible property ensures that the tax is constitutionally applied. For a resident, however, their domicile grants Minnesota the authority to tax their entire estate of intangible property.
• Key Takeaway: The Anderson case serves as a powerful and definitive warning: for Minnesota residents, simply changing the situs or location of intangible assets to a no-tax state like South Dakota or Florida is an ineffective strategy for avoiding the Minnesota estate tax.⁵³ The state’s taxing authority is based on the decedent’s legal domicile, not the physical or administrative location of their investment accounts or trusts.

Anonymized Client Scenarios (Illustrative Examples)

• The Family Farm: Let’s consider the Johnsons, a married couple who own a qualifying family farm in Minnesota valued at $4.5 million, with other assets bringing their total estate to $5 million. If they do no planning and Mr. Johnson dies, leaving everything to Mrs. Johnson, his $3 million exemption is wasted. When Mrs. Johnson later dies with a $5 million estate, her estate can use her $3 million general exemption and a $2 million Qualified Farm Property Deduction, resulting in no tax. This seems fine, but what if the farm grows in value to $6 million by the time she dies? Now her estate is worth $6.5 million. Her total exemption is capped at $5 million ($3M general + $2M farm), leaving a taxable estate of $1.5 million and a significant tax bill. A better plan would use trusts at Mr. Johnson’s death to shelter $3 million of assets, using his exemption. When Mrs. Johnson dies, her estate is only $3.5 million, which is fully covered by her own exemption and a smaller farm deduction, eliminating the tax regardless of the farm’s appreciation. This illustrates the principles of using both exemptions and the farm deduction proactively.¹³
• The Snowbird Couple: Meet the Petersons, a Minnesota couple with a $7 million estate, including their home in Edina and a condo in Florida. They have simple wills leaving everything to each other. Mr. Peterson passes away first. His entire $3.5 million share of the estate passes to Mrs. Peterson tax-free due to the unlimited marital deduction. However, his $3 million Minnesota exemption is completely lost due to non-portability. A few years later, Mrs. Peterson dies. Her estate is now worth the full $7 million. She can only use her own $3 million exemption. Her estate will owe Minnesota estate tax on the remaining $4 million, resulting in a tax liability of over $500,000. A well-structured plan would have used a trust (often called a bypass or credit shelter trust) at Mr. Peterson’s death to hold $3 million of his assets. This would have used his exemption. Mrs. Peterson could still benefit from this trust during her lifetime. At her death, her own estate would only be $4 million, which would be shielded by her $3 million exemption, resulting in tax on only $1 million—a massive tax savings achieved simply by not wasting the first spouse’s exemption.⁴

Part V: The Advisor’s Perspective: Assembling Your Financial Legacy

The technical rules, tax tables, and legal precedents form the grammar of estate planning.

But creating a successful plan is more akin to writing a story than solving an equation.

It requires moving beyond the documents to understand the human element—the values, relationships, and aspirations that give the plan its ultimate meaning.

The role of an advisor is not just to be a legal draftsman but a strategic architect, helping clients build a legacy that is not only tax-efficient but also a true reflection of their life’s work.

Beyond the Documents: The Human Element of Planning

An estate planning attorney’s day is spent not just with statutes and software, but with people navigating some of life’s most profound questions.⁵⁵

The work involves far more than drafting wills and trusts; it is a process of deep listening and counsel.

A significant portion of the process is dedicated to in-depth consultations, understanding a family’s unique composition, their financial assets, and their deepest goals and fears.⁵⁶

Is the primary goal to ensure a special needs child is cared for? To protect an inheritance from a beneficiary’s potential creditors or divorce? To ensure a family business passes to the next generation? The answers to these questions shape the legal and financial strategy.

This human-centric approach is critical to avoiding plans that are technically perfect but practically unlivable.

A poignant example is that of a business owner whose initial plan, designed solely to maximize tax savings, involved transferring half his company’s stock to his wife.

The plan stipulated that if she died first, her brother would become the trustee of her trust, effectively making the client’s brother-in-law a 50% partner in his business.

The client, horrified at this unintended consequence, had to completely restructure the plan.

The initial lawyer, who had never met the client in person, had saved taxes but failed the client by ignoring the personal and emotional cost of the strategy.⁵⁸

A good plan must align with a client’s comfort level with control and their core family relationships.

The Jigsaw Puzzle Analogy Revisited: A Step-by-Step Guide

Viewing the estate planning process through the lens of assembling a complex jigsaw puzzle provides a clear, step-by-step framework for transforming a collection of disparate financial pieces into a coherent and complete legacy.

• Step 1: Study the Picture on the Box Top: Before touching a single puzzle piece, an expert puzzler studies the image on the box. This is the visioning phase of estate planning.¹⁰ It involves answering the big questions: What does the ideal future for your family look like? What values do you want to pass on? What charitable impact do you wish to make? This “boxtop picture” is the high-level strategy that guides every subsequent decision.⁸
• Step 2: Find the Corners and Edges: The next step is to build the frame. In estate planning, this is the foundational work: drafting and executing the essential documents that create the legal structure for everything else. This includes a will (even with a trust, a “pourover” will is needed), a durable power of attorney for financial matters, and a health care directive for medical decisions.⁴⁸ This framework contains the entire plan.
• Step 3: Group the Pieces by Color: Now, the puzzler sorts the pieces into groups based on color and pattern. This is analogous to asset analysis and organization.¹⁰ The advisor and client identify and categorize all the assets: retirement accounts (like 401(k)s and IRAs with their unique income tax rules), real estate, taxable investment accounts, life insurance, and business interests. Each category has distinct characteristics and must be handled differently to fit into the overall picture.
• Step 4: Assemble the Sections: With the pieces sorted, the work of assembling smaller sections of the puzzle begins. This is the implementation of the advanced strategies.⁶⁰ One section might be setting up and funding an ILIT. Another might be creating and funding an FLP for the family business. A third involves meticulously reviewing and updating all beneficiary designations to align with the plan. Each of these “sections” is a complex mini-project that must be completed correctly before it can be integrated into the whole.
• Step 5: Complete the Picture: Finally, the assembled sections are fitted together within the frame, and the last few pieces are placed to reveal the complete, seamless image. In estate planning, this is the fully integrated plan, where the trust is funded, beneficiary designations are correct, and all documents work in harmony. The vision from the box top has become a reality.

A Concluding Principle: Good is Better than Perfect

One of the most insidious traps in estate planning is the pursuit of perfection.

Some individuals delay executing a plan because they are trying to account for every conceivable future event, a goal that is ultimately impossible.⁴⁸

Life circumstances change, family dynamics evolve, and tax laws are revised by legislatures.³⁵

The most effective and prudent approach is to create and implement a solid, thoughtful, and well-reasoned plan today.

A good plan that is legally in force is infinitely more valuable to a family than a “perfect” plan that exists only in draft form on a lawyer’s computer.

The key is to commit to a process of regular review—every three to five years, or after any major life event—to ensure the plan remains aligned with one’s goals and the current legal landscape.

Conclusion: Securing Your Legacy in the North Star State

The landscape of wealth transfer in Minnesota is defined by a series of unique and challenging features.

The state’s $3 million estate tax exemption, while substantial, stands in stark contrast to the much higher federal threshold, creating a state-specific tax liability for many families, farmers, and business owners.

The lack of portability for spousal exemptions and the three-year gift clawback rule are significant planning hurdles that demand careful and proactive strategies.

These are not minor details; they are the central pillars of Minnesota’s estate tax system, and ignoring them can lead to the unnecessary erosion of a lifetime of work and savings.

Yet, for every challenge, a strategic solution exists.

Through a disciplined program of annual gifting, the thoughtful application of trusts like ILITs and CRTs, and the specialized use of tools like FLPs and the Qualified Farm Property Deduction, the impact of the Minnesota estate tax can be significantly mitigated, if not eliminated entirely.

The rules of this complex puzzle are knowable.

While navigating them requires the guidance of experienced legal and financial professionals, a clear understanding of the complete picture—the interplay of state and federal law, the available strategies, and the potential pitfalls—is the first and most critical step.

It is this understanding that empowers individuals to move from apprehension to action, transforming the daunting task of estate planning into a deliberate act of securing their legacy for the generations to come.

Works cited

1. Minnesota Estate Tax: Everything You Need to Know – SmartAsset, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://smartasset.com/estate-planning/minnesota-estate-tax
2. Minnesota Inheritance Tax: What Residents Need to Know – Clerestory Advisors, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://clerestoryadvisors.com/blog-posts/minnesota-inheritance-tax-what-residents-need-to-know
3. Estate Tax versus Inheritance Tax | Minnesota Department of Revenue, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/estate-tax-versus-inheritance-tax
4. A Simple Guide to Estate Taxes in Minnesota for 2025 – 360 Financial, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.360financial.net/post/estate-taxes-minnesota
5. Minnesota Estate Planning and Taxes: What You Need to Know. – German Law, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://germanlawgf.com/blog/estate-planning-2/minnesota-estate-planning-and-taxes-what-you-need-to-know/
6. Estate Tax | Minnesota Department of Revenue, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/estate-tax
7. A Breakdown of Minnesota Estate Taxes – Heley | Duncan | Melander, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.heleyduncan.com/a-breakdown-of-minnesota-estate-taxes/
8. What is Financial Planning? A Few Analogies to Help You Understand, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://flowfp.com/financial-planning-analogies/
9. Free Financial Puzzle Pieces Image | Download at StockCake, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://stockcake.com/i/financial-puzzle-pieces_190302_33497
10. 5 Steps To Winning at Personal Finance – The Physician Philosopher, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://thephysicianphilosopher.com/personal-finance-puzzle/
11. Financial Planning Is Like A Jigsaw Puzzle, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.lifetimefinancialstrategiesllc.com/blog/financial-planning-is-like-a-jigsaw-puzzle
12. Estate Taxes | Guttman Law, PLLC, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.guttmanlaw.com/resources/frequently-asked-questions/estate-taxes/
13. The Minnesota Estate Tax, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.house.mn.gov/hrd/pubs/ss/ssesttx.pdf
14. www.wagnerlegalmn.com, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.wagnerlegalmn.com/updated-estate-and-gift-tax-information-for-2025/#:~:text=The%20Minnesota%20estate%20tax%20exemption,estate%20value%20over%20%2410.1%20million.
15. Estate Tax Filing Requirement | Minnesota Department of Revenue, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/estate-tax-filing-requirement
16. Minnesota Estate Tax Exemption 2025 – Farrish Johnson Law Office, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.farrishlaw.com/minnesota-estate-tax-exemption-2025/
17. A Comprehensive Guide to Avoiding Estate Taxes in Minnesota | Heritage Law Office, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.heritagelawwi.com/a-comprehensive-guide-to-avoiding-estate-taxes-in-minnesota
18. Preview of 2023 Estate Tax Exemptions and What to do Now – Fafinski Mark & Johnson, P.A., accessed on August 11, 2025, http://www.fmjlaw.com/preview-of-2023-estate-tax-exemptions-and-what-to-do-now/
19. 2024 Estate Tax Exemptions and Planning Considerations – Fafinski Mark & Johnson, P.A., accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.fmjlaw.com/2024-estate-tax-exemptions-and-planning-considerations/
20. Minnesota Estate Tax – Nolo, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/minnesota-estate-tax.html
21. Sec. 289A.10 MN Statutes, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/289a.10
22. 2025 Estate Tax Exemptions and Planning Considerations | Publications – Faegre Drinker, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.faegredrinker.com/en/insights/publications/2025/1/2025-estate-tax-exemptions-and-planning-considerations
23. 2025 Federal & State Tax Updates In MN Impact Estate & Gift Planning – Henson Efron, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hensonefron.com/2025-federal-and-state-tax-updates/
24. Tax issues for estate planning | UMN Extension, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://extension.umn.edu/transfer-and-estate-planning/tax-issues-estate-planning
25. Estate Tax Form M706 Instructions 2004, accessed on August 11, 2025, http://www.zillionforms.com/2003/I55016.PDF
26. What Is an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) | New York Life, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.newyorklife.com/articles/importance-of-irrevocable-life-insurance-trusts
27. The Estate Tax and Lifetime Gifting – Charles Schwab, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/estate-tax-and-lifetime-gifting
28. Minimize Taxes With Estate Planning and Gifting – MFS Investment Management, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.mfs.com/content/dam/mfs-enterprise/mfscom/heritageplanning/infosheets/hp_epgift_flye.pdf
29. Gifting: A Powerful Tool for an Effective Estate Planning Strategy | Alerts and Articles, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.ballardspahr.com/insights/alerts-and-articles/2024/02/gifting-a-powerful-tool-for-an-effective-estate-planning-strategy
30. www.schwab.com, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/estate-tax-and-lifetime-gifting#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20say%20you%20wanted,lifetime%20gift%20and%20estate%20exemption.
31. Understanding Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs), accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.commercetrustcompany.com/research-and-insights/articles/understanding-irrevocable-life-insurance-trusts
32. Estate planning Q&A: Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts explained – RSM US, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://rsmus.com/insights/services/private-client/irrevocable-life-insurance-trusts-explained.html
33. Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts: An Effective Estate Tax Reduction Technique (Part 1) – American Bar Association, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/aba_tax_times/13sum-ptr3-abrahams.pdf
34. What Is an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT)? – Northwestern Mutual, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.northwesternmutual.com/life-and-money/what-is-an-irrevocable-life-insurance-trust/
35. High Net Worth Planning: Estate Strategies for Affluent Individuals …, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://stonearchlaw.com/high-net-worth-planning-estate-strategies-for-affluent-individuals/
36. Minneapolis High Net Worth Estate Planning Lawyer – Unique, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://uniqueestatelaw.com/practice-areas/what-does-it-mean-to-work-with-an-estate-planning-attorney/estate-planning-for-high-net-worth-individuals/
37. Charitable Remainder Trusts, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.fidelitycharitable.org/guidance/philanthropy/charitable-remainder-trusts.html
38. How Does a Charitable Remainder Trust Work: The Setup Process, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.bryanfagan.com/blog/2025/05/how-does-a-charitable-remainder-trust-work/
39. Cash Flow & Philanthropy: Charitable Remainder Trusts, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/cash-flow-and-philanthropy-charitable-remainder-trusts
40. Charitable Remainder Trust: Definition, How It Works, and Types – Investopedia, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/charitableremaindertrust.asp
41. Charitable Remainder Trusts Pros And Cons. What You Should Know! – Hess-Verdon, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://hessverdon.com/pros-and-cons-of-charitable-remainder-trust/
42. Minneapolis MN Twin Cities Estate Planning for High Net Worth Individuals Attorney Lawyer Law Firm, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://stonelawmn.com/minneapolis-mn-twin-cities-estate-planning-for-high-net-worth-individuals-lawyer_pa7628.htm
43. Family Limited Partnerships 101 – Wolters Kluwer, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/family-limited-partnerships-101
44. Family Limited Partnerships | San Diego Estate Planning Lawyer, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.help411.com/practice-areas/estate-planning/family-limited-partnerships/
45. The Power of Family Limited Partnerships (FLP) for Estate Planning – Wealth Enhancement, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.wealthenhancement.com/blog/the-power-of-family-limited-partnerships-flp-for-estate-planning
46. New Data on Family Limited Partnerships Reported on Estate Tax Returns – IRS, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/11pwcompench2cfam.pdf
47. Estate Planning Q&A: Family limited partnerships explained – RSM US, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://rsmus.com/insights/tax-alerts/2024/estate-planning-qa-family-limited-partnerships-explained.html
48. 12 Common Estate Planning Mistakes – DuluthMN.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://duluthmn.gov/media/sx4lxmvm/mistakes-in-estate-planning.pdf
49. Minnesota Estate Planning Questions & Answers – DuluthMN.gov, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://duluthmn.gov/media/mctc3510/estate-planning-q-a-7-2023.pdf
50. Top 10 Estate Planning Mistakes – Cummins & Bonestroo Law Office, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.cblawoffices.com/top-10-estate-planning-mistakes/
51. Wills and Trusts, and if your estate plan were a car, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://yourcaringlawfirm.com/blog-84-if-an-estate-plan-were-a-car-understanding-will-based-vs-trust-based-planning/
52. How Estate Planning is Like Building a House – The Bernstein Law Group, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://blgpc.com/how-estate-planning-is-like-building-a-house/
53. Tax Court Confirms Constitutionality of Minnesota Estate Tax – Lathrop GPM, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.lathropgpm.com/insights/tax-court-confirms-constitutionality-of-minnesota-estate-tax/
54. Tax Ruling Highlights Importance of Estate Planning – The Law Office of Amy Kuronen, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://amykuronenlaw.com/minnesota-estate-tax-case/
55. What Is It Like to Be an Estate Planning Attorney? – Ann Arbor MI …, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://arborestateplanning.com/what-is-it-like-to-be-an-estate-planning-attorney/
56. A Day in the Life of a Texas Estate Planning Attorney, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.bryanfagan.com/blog/2025/02/life-of-a-texas-estate-planning-attorney/
57. The Ultimate Guide to What an Estate Planning Attorney Does – OC Elder Law, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.ocelderlaw.com/what-does-an-estate-planning-attorney-do/
58. ESTATE PLANNING APPROACH | A CASE STUDY – Overom Law, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.overomlaw.com/estate-planning-case-study
59. Fitting the Puzzle Pieces Together – Exit Planning Blog, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://blog.exit-planning-institute.org/cepa-puzzle-analogy
60. Jigsaw puzzles and business performance: What they have in common, accessed on August 11, 2025, https://www.goeinswilliams.com/jigsaw-puzzles-and-business-performance-what-they-have-in-common/